Comparing the Effectiveness of Schema Therapy Augmented Exposure and Response Prevention With Exposure and Response Prevention and Pharmacotherapy in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

S. Masoumian, B. Gharraee, Abbas Ramezani Farani, M. Shaeiri, Ali Asghar Asgharnejadfarid
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of Schema Therapy Augmented Exposure and Response Prevention With Exposure and Response Prevention and Pharmacotherapy in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder","authors":"S. Masoumian, B. Gharraee, Abbas Ramezani Farani, M. Shaeiri, Ali Asghar Asgharnejadfarid","doi":"10.32598/ijpcp.28.2.2497.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is defined in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) as annoying and unpleasant thoughts or images (obsession) associated with repetitive and unwanted actions (compulsion). This study aims to compare emotional schema therapy augmented exposure and response prevention (ESTERP) with exposure and response prevention (ERP) and pharmacotherapy in improving the symptoms of OCD patients. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial study. The participants included all patients with OCD who were referred to hospitals and clinics in Tehran, Iran. A total of 45 patients with OCD were selected through purposeful sampling, of which 15 patients were randomly assigned to the ESTERP group, 15 to the ERP group, and 15 to the pharmacotherapy group. After randomly placing the patients in the three groups, all patients completed the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale-2nd edition (Y-BOCS-II), the four systems anxiety questionnaire (FSAQ), and the Beck depression inventory-2nd edition (BDI-II) before, in the end, and 2 months after the treatment. Then, the data were analyzed using nonparametric tests and the reliable change index. Results: There was a significant difference between the treatment of ESTERP with ERP and pharmacotherapy in the symptoms and severity of OCD and anxiety (except for the depression variable) in patients with OCD. In addition, the findings of the clinical significance of ESTERP compared to the other two treatments showed more significant changes in symptoms and severity of OCD and depression (except for the anxiety variable). Conclusion: Both ESTERP and ERP treatments are effective in patients with OCD and both lead to more improvements in patients’ symptoms than pharmacotherapy.","PeriodicalId":43609,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/ijpcp.28.2.2497.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is defined in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) as annoying and unpleasant thoughts or images (obsession) associated with repetitive and unwanted actions (compulsion). This study aims to compare emotional schema therapy augmented exposure and response prevention (ESTERP) with exposure and response prevention (ERP) and pharmacotherapy in improving the symptoms of OCD patients. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial study. The participants included all patients with OCD who were referred to hospitals and clinics in Tehran, Iran. A total of 45 patients with OCD were selected through purposeful sampling, of which 15 patients were randomly assigned to the ESTERP group, 15 to the ERP group, and 15 to the pharmacotherapy group. After randomly placing the patients in the three groups, all patients completed the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale-2nd edition (Y-BOCS-II), the four systems anxiety questionnaire (FSAQ), and the Beck depression inventory-2nd edition (BDI-II) before, in the end, and 2 months after the treatment. Then, the data were analyzed using nonparametric tests and the reliable change index. Results: There was a significant difference between the treatment of ESTERP with ERP and pharmacotherapy in the symptoms and severity of OCD and anxiety (except for the depression variable) in patients with OCD. In addition, the findings of the clinical significance of ESTERP compared to the other two treatments showed more significant changes in symptoms and severity of OCD and depression (except for the anxiety variable). Conclusion: Both ESTERP and ERP treatments are effective in patients with OCD and both lead to more improvements in patients’ symptoms than pharmacotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图式疗法、增强暴露和反应预防与暴露和反应预防及药物治疗对强迫症的疗效比较
目的:强迫症(OCD)在精神障碍诊断和统计手册第5版(DSM-5)中被定义为与重复和不想要的行为(强迫)相关的令人讨厌和不愉快的想法或图像(痴迷)。本研究旨在比较情绪图式疗法增强暴露和反应预防(ESTERP)、暴露和反应防止(ERP)和药物治疗在改善强迫症患者症状方面的作用。方法:这是一项随机临床试验研究。参与者包括所有被转诊到伊朗德黑兰医院和诊所的强迫症患者。通过有目的的抽样,共选择45名强迫症患者,其中15名患者被随机分配到ESTERP组,15名被分配到ERP组,15人被分配到药物治疗组。在将患者随机分为三组后,所有患者在治疗前、治疗结束时和治疗后2个月完成Yale-Brown强迫症量表第二版(Y-BOCS-II)、四系统焦虑问卷(FSAQ)和Beck抑郁量表第2版(BDI-II)。然后,使用非参数检验和可靠变化指数对数据进行分析。结果:在强迫症患者的症状、严重程度和焦虑(除抑郁变量外)方面,ERP治疗ESTERP与药物治疗有显著差异。此外,与其他两种治疗相比,ESTERP的临床意义发现,强迫症和抑郁症的症状和严重程度发生了更显著的变化(焦虑变量除外)。结论:与药物治疗相比,ESTERP和ERP治疗对强迫症患者都是有效的,并且都能更好地改善患者的症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Alzheimer’s disease: is there a way out of the deaf corner? Psychoanalysis and evidence-based practice in mental health Energy for treating trauma/PTSD Professional Quality of Life, Empathy, and Coping Strategies of Young Clinical Psychologists in Lahore, Pakistan Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Craving and Problematic Pornography Use in Young Men: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1