Coloring the Past, Considerations on Our Future: RaceB4Race

IF 0.8 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE New Literary History Pub Date : 2022-02-04 DOI:10.1353/nlh.2021.0018
Margo Hendricks
{"title":"Coloring the Past, Considerations on Our Future: RaceB4Race","authors":"Margo Hendricks","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2021.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay is not one i thought to write when asked to contribute to this issue. My expectation was that I would submit a simple revision of \"Coloring the Past, Rewriting Our Future: RaceB4Race\" (the keynote lecture from which this paper emerges), only along scholarly lines. Yet, as history has long proven, what people intend and what they actually produce may be very different. I now find myself in a different writing space and less wedded to academic rhetoric. This essay, then, is a thought piece, a forward-facing reflection on the public humanities. It is also autobiographical in certain respects, since I am an academic who once struggled to find a place within the academy but no longer do. Thus, this meditation/mediation has two parts. Part One is retrospective: a look back at my place in an effort to decolonize my professional relationship to the academy and the discipline where my intellectual efforts are housed, the field of early modern English literature and culture (where I once landed not fully by choice). Part Two is a letter to and for Black, Indigenous, Peoples of Color (BIPOC) colleagues and allies.","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":"52 1","pages":"365 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2021.0018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract:This essay is not one i thought to write when asked to contribute to this issue. My expectation was that I would submit a simple revision of "Coloring the Past, Rewriting Our Future: RaceB4Race" (the keynote lecture from which this paper emerges), only along scholarly lines. Yet, as history has long proven, what people intend and what they actually produce may be very different. I now find myself in a different writing space and less wedded to academic rhetoric. This essay, then, is a thought piece, a forward-facing reflection on the public humanities. It is also autobiographical in certain respects, since I am an academic who once struggled to find a place within the academy but no longer do. Thus, this meditation/mediation has two parts. Part One is retrospective: a look back at my place in an effort to decolonize my professional relationship to the academy and the discipline where my intellectual efforts are housed, the field of early modern English literature and culture (where I once landed not fully by choice). Part Two is a letter to and for Black, Indigenous, Peoples of Color (BIPOC) colleagues and allies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
涂色过去,思考我们的未来:种族
摘要:这篇文章并不是我被邀请为这个问题投稿时想写的。我的期望是,我将提交一份简单的修订“着色过去,重写我们的未来:RaceB4Race”(这篇论文的主题演讲),只是沿着学术路线。然而,正如历史早已证明的那样,人们的意图和他们实际生产的东西可能非常不同。现在我发现自己在一个不同的写作空间,不那么拘泥于学术修辞。因此,这篇文章是一篇思想文章,是对公共人文学科的前瞻性反思。在某些方面,它也是自传体的,因为我是一名学者,曾经努力在学术界找到一个位置,但现在已经没有了。因此,这个冥想/冥想有两个部分。第一部分是回顾:回顾我的位置,努力去殖民化我与学院和学科的专业关系,这是我的智力成果所在,早期现代英国文学和文化领域(我曾经不是完全出于选择)。第二部分是致黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)同事和盟友的一封信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Literary History
New Literary History LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.
期刊最新文献
"Let me look again": The Moral Philosophy and Literature Debate at 40 Aesthetic Affairs: Art, Architecture, and the Illusion of Detachment Medieval Futures and the Postwork Romance Idols of the Fragment: Barthes and Critique Metaphorical Figures for Moral Complexity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1