Building trust in information: perspectives on the frontiers of provenance

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Archives and Manuscripts Pub Date : 2018-05-04 DOI:10.1080/01576895.2018.1464217
Jacqueline J. Bettington
{"title":"Building trust in information: perspectives on the frontiers of provenance","authors":"Jacqueline J. Bettington","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2018.1464217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building Trust in Information is a collection of multidisciplinary papers originally presented at an international workshop held in 2015 to explore the conceptualisation and application of provenance in digital ecosystems. While the book is ‘foundational’ in its treatment of provenance, it is not a text on provenance fundamentals. Nor does it seek to be a definitive representation of disciplinary views on provenance. The book’s aims are to (1) unpack and explore different professional conceptualisations of provenance; (2) synthesise those ideas; and (3) enrich our understanding of provenance to advance new research in this area. The first two aims are broadly achieved in the first chapter authored by Victoria L Lemieux, and the imProvenance Group. Nine of the fifteen workshop participants present their disciplinary perspectives on ‘provenance’ in the rest of the book and, in varying degrees, contribute to the first and third aims. Published in digital and hardcopy versions, the book is divided into five parts: (1) Synthesis; (2) Archival Perspectives; (3) Library and Information Science Perspectives; (4) Computer Science Perspectives; and (5) Cognitive Science Perspectives Through the Lens of Visual Analytics. Bibliographies and/or references are included in each chapter. The book is not indexed. Part I is a lengthy and informative discussion of the key points raised in the rest of the book. It provides an extensive and diverse set of examples (use cases) where the application of provenance is challenged by technology, process and stakeholder expectations. It recognises that while different disciplinary views on provenance co-exist and can be challenging, they can also offer opportunities for all professions to better understand, manage and use provenance-related data. Very little guidance is given on how this can be achieved through research and practice. Part II explores the history and application of provenance in archival science. In the first chapter Adrian Cunningham discusses the development of the Australian Series System in response to the challenge of multiple provenances and how the system has evolved and influenced archival theory, standards and practice in the digital environment. Giovanni Michetti examines the definition and conceptualisation of provenance and discusses provenance in the context of current research, how it influences different archival functions and identifies technology-enabled opportunities for enriching archival approaches to provenance. The archival perspective closes with Kenneth Thibodeau’s argument that conceptual ‘narrowness and vagueness’ (p. 70) have generated disagreement and confusion about the archival application of provenance and original order. He suggests that by modifying concepts, methods and tools from other disciplines, archivists can enhance the management and preservation of records in the digital environment. Part III covers the library and information science perspectives of provenance. Lucie C Burgess explains the wide definition of provenance in libraries and its use for understanding 246 BOOK REVIEWS","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2018.1464217","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1464217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Building Trust in Information is a collection of multidisciplinary papers originally presented at an international workshop held in 2015 to explore the conceptualisation and application of provenance in digital ecosystems. While the book is ‘foundational’ in its treatment of provenance, it is not a text on provenance fundamentals. Nor does it seek to be a definitive representation of disciplinary views on provenance. The book’s aims are to (1) unpack and explore different professional conceptualisations of provenance; (2) synthesise those ideas; and (3) enrich our understanding of provenance to advance new research in this area. The first two aims are broadly achieved in the first chapter authored by Victoria L Lemieux, and the imProvenance Group. Nine of the fifteen workshop participants present their disciplinary perspectives on ‘provenance’ in the rest of the book and, in varying degrees, contribute to the first and third aims. Published in digital and hardcopy versions, the book is divided into five parts: (1) Synthesis; (2) Archival Perspectives; (3) Library and Information Science Perspectives; (4) Computer Science Perspectives; and (5) Cognitive Science Perspectives Through the Lens of Visual Analytics. Bibliographies and/or references are included in each chapter. The book is not indexed. Part I is a lengthy and informative discussion of the key points raised in the rest of the book. It provides an extensive and diverse set of examples (use cases) where the application of provenance is challenged by technology, process and stakeholder expectations. It recognises that while different disciplinary views on provenance co-exist and can be challenging, they can also offer opportunities for all professions to better understand, manage and use provenance-related data. Very little guidance is given on how this can be achieved through research and practice. Part II explores the history and application of provenance in archival science. In the first chapter Adrian Cunningham discusses the development of the Australian Series System in response to the challenge of multiple provenances and how the system has evolved and influenced archival theory, standards and practice in the digital environment. Giovanni Michetti examines the definition and conceptualisation of provenance and discusses provenance in the context of current research, how it influences different archival functions and identifies technology-enabled opportunities for enriching archival approaches to provenance. The archival perspective closes with Kenneth Thibodeau’s argument that conceptual ‘narrowness and vagueness’ (p. 70) have generated disagreement and confusion about the archival application of provenance and original order. He suggests that by modifying concepts, methods and tools from other disciplines, archivists can enhance the management and preservation of records in the digital environment. Part III covers the library and information science perspectives of provenance. Lucie C Burgess explains the wide definition of provenance in libraries and its use for understanding 246 BOOK REVIEWS
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立对信息的信任:来源前沿的视角
《建立信息信任》是2015年在一次国际研讨会上发表的多学科论文合集,旨在探讨数字生态系统中来源的概念化和应用。虽然这本书是“基础”在其处理的来源,它不是一个文本的来源基础。它也不寻求成为关于来源的学科观点的明确代表。这本书的目的是(1)打开和探索不同的专业概念的来源;(2)综合这些想法;(3)丰富我们对物源的认识,推动这一领域的新研究。前两个目标在由Victoria L Lemieux和improenance Group撰写的第一章中得到了广泛的实现。15位研讨会参与者中的9位在本书的其余部分中展示了他们对“起源”的学科观点,并在不同程度上为第一个和第三个目标做出了贡献。本书有电子版和纸质版,分为五个部分:(1)综合;(2)档案视角;(3)图书馆情报学视角;(4)计算机科学展望;(5)视觉分析视角下的认知科学视角。每章都包含参考书目和/或参考文献。这本书没有索引。第一部分对本书其余部分提出的要点进行了冗长而翔实的讨论。它提供了一组广泛而多样的示例(用例),其中出处的应用受到技术、过程和涉众期望的挑战。它认识到,虽然不同学科对来源的看法并存,而且可能具有挑战性,但它们也可以为所有专业人员更好地理解、管理和使用与来源相关的数据提供机会。关于如何通过研究和实践实现这一目标的指导很少。第二部分探讨了资料来源在档案学中的历史和应用。在第一章中,Adrian Cunningham讨论了澳大利亚系列系统的发展,以应对多重来源的挑战,以及该系统如何演变并影响数字环境下的档案理论、标准和实践。Giovanni Michetti研究了来源的定义和概念化,并在当前研究的背景下讨论了来源,它如何影响不同的档案功能,并确定了丰富档案来源方法的技术支持机会。档案视角结束于Kenneth Thibodeau的观点,即概念上的“狭隘和模糊”(第70页)已经产生了关于起源和原始顺序的档案应用的分歧和混乱。他建议,通过修改其他学科的概念、方法和工具,档案工作者可以在数字环境中加强对记录的管理和保存。第三部分涵盖了图书馆情报学视角下的文献来源。Lucie C Burgess解释了图书馆中出处的广泛定义及其在理解246篇书评中的应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives and Manuscripts
Archives and Manuscripts INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Transitioning to open access The Indigenous Archives Collective position statement on the right of reply to Indigenous knowledges and information held in archives Activating and supporting the Tandanya Adelaide Declaration on Indigenous Archives Rancière, political theory and activist community appraisal Towards Transformative Practice in Out of Home Care: Chartering Rights in Recordkeeping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1