Sovereign Attachments: Masculinity, Muslimness, and Affective Politics in Pakistan. By Shenila Khoja-Moolji. Oakland: University of California Press, 2021. 288 pp. $85.00 (cloth), $34.95 (paper). ISBN: 9780520336803.

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Gender Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.1017/S1743923X2200006X
Faria A. Nasruddin
{"title":"Sovereign Attachments: Masculinity, Muslimness, and Affective Politics in Pakistan. By Shenila Khoja-Moolji. Oakland: University of California Press, 2021. 288 pp. $85.00 (cloth), $34.95 (paper). ISBN: 9780520336803.","authors":"Faria A. Nasruddin","doi":"10.1017/S1743923X2200006X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of the December 2014 Tehrik-e-Taliban attack on the Army Public School (APS) in Peshawar, which killed 132 children and 9 teachers and staff, both the Taliban and the Pakistani state put forth their own claims and justifications of violence. To Shenila Khoja-Moolji, this tragic incident is emblematic of how the preexisting conceptualization of sovereignty—as the hegemonic, unified monopolization of violence by the state—inadequately explains the specifically postcolonial context of Pakistan. Using this observation as a point of departure, KhojaMoolji’s Sovereign Attachments: Masculinity, Muslimness, and Affective Politics in Pakistan thus interrogates the “entanglements and shared repertoire” (3) of the Taliban and the Pakistani state; examines various gendered performances and figurations in Pakistan; and posits a new theory of sovereignty, centered on its cultural, discursive, and affective dimensions. Sovereignty, to Khoja-Moolji, is more than an absolute politico-legal concept. Rather, she argues that it is a created and cultivated relationship, or an attachment, between the sovereign and an allied public. In otherwords, sovereignty is a discursive and affective (gendered) performance in which competing sovereigns engage. Applying this definition to her case study, Khoja-Moolji notes that when staking their claims to sovereignty, the Pakistani state and the Taliban extrapolate from the same cultural scripts of gender, sexuality, normative Islam, the family, and imaginations of past and future to foster attachments to their particular visions of the political, whether the Pakistani nation-state or the entire Muslim ummah, and to stipulate who belongs and who does not. Relatedly, another novel concept that Khoja-Moolji develops is “Islamomasculinity,” or the intertwined normative scripts of masculinity and Muslimness, by which authoritative sovereign power is primarily performed by both the Taliban and the Pakistani state. Other gendered figurations—the paternal father, the innocent child, the mourning mother, the brave soldier, the resolute believer, the perverse terrorist, and the dutiful daughter—figure in upholding","PeriodicalId":47464,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Gender","volume":"19 1","pages":"308 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Gender","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X2200006X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the aftermath of the December 2014 Tehrik-e-Taliban attack on the Army Public School (APS) in Peshawar, which killed 132 children and 9 teachers and staff, both the Taliban and the Pakistani state put forth their own claims and justifications of violence. To Shenila Khoja-Moolji, this tragic incident is emblematic of how the preexisting conceptualization of sovereignty—as the hegemonic, unified monopolization of violence by the state—inadequately explains the specifically postcolonial context of Pakistan. Using this observation as a point of departure, KhojaMoolji’s Sovereign Attachments: Masculinity, Muslimness, and Affective Politics in Pakistan thus interrogates the “entanglements and shared repertoire” (3) of the Taliban and the Pakistani state; examines various gendered performances and figurations in Pakistan; and posits a new theory of sovereignty, centered on its cultural, discursive, and affective dimensions. Sovereignty, to Khoja-Moolji, is more than an absolute politico-legal concept. Rather, she argues that it is a created and cultivated relationship, or an attachment, between the sovereign and an allied public. In otherwords, sovereignty is a discursive and affective (gendered) performance in which competing sovereigns engage. Applying this definition to her case study, Khoja-Moolji notes that when staking their claims to sovereignty, the Pakistani state and the Taliban extrapolate from the same cultural scripts of gender, sexuality, normative Islam, the family, and imaginations of past and future to foster attachments to their particular visions of the political, whether the Pakistani nation-state or the entire Muslim ummah, and to stipulate who belongs and who does not. Relatedly, another novel concept that Khoja-Moolji develops is “Islamomasculinity,” or the intertwined normative scripts of masculinity and Muslimness, by which authoritative sovereign power is primarily performed by both the Taliban and the Pakistani state. Other gendered figurations—the paternal father, the innocent child, the mourning mother, the brave soldier, the resolute believer, the perverse terrorist, and the dutiful daughter—figure in upholding
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
君主依恋:巴基斯坦的男性气质、穆斯林气质和情感政治。作者:Shenila Khoja Moolji。奥克兰:加州大学出版社,2021年。288页85.00美元(布),34.95美元(纸)。ISBN:9780520336803。
2014年12月,塔利班袭击了白沙瓦的陆军公立学校,造成132名儿童和9名教师和工作人员死亡。之后,塔利班和巴基斯坦政府都提出了自己的暴力主张和理由。对Shenila Khoja Moolji来说,这起悲剧事件象征着先前存在的主权概念——即国家对暴力的霸权、统一垄断——如何不充分地解释巴基斯坦的具体后殖民背景。以这一观察为出发点,KhojaMoolji的《君主依恋:巴基斯坦的男性化、穆斯林化和情感政治》由此质疑了塔利班和巴基斯坦政府的“纠缠和共同曲目”(3);审查巴基斯坦的各种性别表现和形象;并提出了一种新的主权理论,以其文化、话语和情感维度为中心。对Khoja Moolji来说,主权不仅仅是一个绝对的政治法律概念。相反,她认为这是君主和联盟公众之间创造和培养的关系,或者说是一种依恋。换言之,主权是一种话语和情感(性别化)的表现,竞争的主权国家参与其中。Khoja Moolji将这一定义应用到她的案例研究中,她指出,巴基斯坦政府和塔利班在宣称主权时,从性别、性取向、规范伊斯兰教、家庭以及对过去和未来的想象等相同的文化脚本中推断,以培养对其政治、,无论是巴基斯坦民族国家还是整个穆斯林乌玛,并规定谁属于谁不属于。与此相关的是,Khoja Moolji发展出的另一个新颖概念是“伊斯兰男子气概”,即男子气概和穆斯林气质交织在一起的规范性脚本,权威主权主要由塔利班和巴基斯坦政府行使。其他性别化的形象——父亲、无辜的孩子、哀悼的母亲、勇敢的士兵、坚定的信徒、乖张的恐怖分子和尽职尽责的女儿——都在维护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Gender
Politics & Gender Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Politics & Gender is an agenda-setting journal that publishes the highest quality scholarship on gender and politics and on women and politics. It aims to represent the full range of questions, issues, and approaches on gender and women across the major subfields of political science, including comparative politics, international relations, political theory, and U.S. politics. The Editor welcomes studies that address fundamental questions in politics and political science from the perspective of gender difference, as well as those that interrogate and challenge standard analytical categories and conventional methodologies.Members of the Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
All the President’s Women? Female Leaders, Family Ties, and Gendered Cabinet Appointments Worldwide Intensifying Gender Inequality: Why Belgian Female Students (Sometimes) Gain Less Internal Political Efficacy from Citizenship Education Than Male Students Ticking Two Boxes, Fighting Two Battles: Intersectional Experiences of Ethnic Minority Women Councillors in UK Local Government Do Women Politicians Know More about Women’s Policy Preferences? Evidence from Canada Backlash after Quotas: Moral Panic as a Soft Repression Tactic against Women Politicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1