Outcomes Following Multidisciplinary Management of Women With Residual Pelvic Pain and Dyspareunia Following Synthetic Vaginal Mesh and/or Mesh Sling Removal

A. Abraham, K. Scott, A. Christie, Patricia Morita-Nagai, A. Chhabra, P. Zimmern
{"title":"Outcomes Following Multidisciplinary Management of Women With Residual Pelvic Pain and Dyspareunia Following Synthetic Vaginal Mesh and/or Mesh Sling Removal","authors":"A. Abraham, K. Scott, A. Christie, Patricia Morita-Nagai, A. Chhabra, P. Zimmern","doi":"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Transvaginal synthetic mesh and mesh sling placement for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse can yield adverse outcomes, including pelvic pain and dyspareunia, that persist after implant removal. Objective: To describe the clinical presentations of women with residual pelvic pain or dyspareunia after synthetic vaginal mesh and/or mesh sling removal and the effectiveness of treatments using a multidisciplinary approach. Study Design: After receiving institutional review board approval, a neutral reviewer retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of women who experienced pelvic pain/dyspareunia after implant removal and were referred to a physiatrist specializing in pelvic rehabilitation medicine. Methods: Included were women who were evaluated by a physiatrist following implant removal. Excluded were women seen for symptoms other than pain or pending subsequent resection procedures. Primary outcome was pelvic pain score assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale obtained at each physiatrist and physical therapy visit. Success was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in pain score. All patients underwent pelvic floor physical therapy, with medications and injections as necessary. Results: From 2010 to 2015, 37 women were included in the analysis. Of these, 4 had isolated dyspareunia and the remaining 33 had general pelvic pain. Eight of these 33 (24%) achieved a successful outcome. When evaluating compliance, half (14 of 28) of the compliant patients achieved improvement in pain scores. Compliant patients treated for isolated dyspareunia experienced more than 80% improvement. Conclusion: Pelvic pain-focused interventions are a worthwhile recommendation in women with refractory pelvic pain after vaginal mesh or mesh sling removal.","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":"43 1","pages":"171 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000140","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Transvaginal synthetic mesh and mesh sling placement for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse can yield adverse outcomes, including pelvic pain and dyspareunia, that persist after implant removal. Objective: To describe the clinical presentations of women with residual pelvic pain or dyspareunia after synthetic vaginal mesh and/or mesh sling removal and the effectiveness of treatments using a multidisciplinary approach. Study Design: After receiving institutional review board approval, a neutral reviewer retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of women who experienced pelvic pain/dyspareunia after implant removal and were referred to a physiatrist specializing in pelvic rehabilitation medicine. Methods: Included were women who were evaluated by a physiatrist following implant removal. Excluded were women seen for symptoms other than pain or pending subsequent resection procedures. Primary outcome was pelvic pain score assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale obtained at each physiatrist and physical therapy visit. Success was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in pain score. All patients underwent pelvic floor physical therapy, with medications and injections as necessary. Results: From 2010 to 2015, 37 women were included in the analysis. Of these, 4 had isolated dyspareunia and the remaining 33 had general pelvic pain. Eight of these 33 (24%) achieved a successful outcome. When evaluating compliance, half (14 of 28) of the compliant patients achieved improvement in pain scores. Compliant patients treated for isolated dyspareunia experienced more than 80% improvement. Conclusion: Pelvic pain-focused interventions are a worthwhile recommendation in women with refractory pelvic pain after vaginal mesh or mesh sling removal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合成阴道补片和/或补片吊带去除后残留骨盆疼痛和性交困难的女性多学科治疗的结果
背景:经阴道放置合成网片和网片吊带治疗压力性尿失禁和盆腔器官脱垂可能会产生不良后果,包括骨盆疼痛和性交困难,这些后果在植入物移除后持续存在。目的:描述女性在人工阴道网片和/或网片吊带移除后出现残余骨盆疼痛或性交困难的临床表现,以及采用多学科方法进行治疗的有效性。研究设计:在获得机构审查委员会的批准后,一名中立评审员回顾性分析了一个前瞻性维护的数据库,该数据库中有植入物切除后出现骨盆疼痛/性交困难的女性,并将其转诊给专门从事骨盆康复医学的物理医生。方法:包括移除植入物后由理疗师进行评估的女性。排除了因疼痛以外的其他症状或等待后续切除手术的女性。主要结果是通过每次理疗师和物理治疗访视时获得的数字疼痛评定量表评估骨盆疼痛评分。成功被定义为疼痛评分降低50%或以上。所有患者都接受了盆底物理治疗,必要时进行药物治疗和注射。结果:从2010年到2015年,37名女性被纳入分析。其中4例为孤立性性交困难,其余33例为全身盆腔疼痛。这33人中有8人(24%)取得了成功。在评估依从性时,一半(28名中的14名)依从性患者的疼痛评分有所改善。接受孤立性性交困难治疗的依从性患者病情改善超过80%。结论:对于阴道网片或网片悬吊术后出现顽固性骨盆疼痛的女性,以骨盆疼痛为重点的干预措施是值得推荐的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Executive Summary: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rehabilitation Interventions for Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency, and/or Urinary Frequency in Adult Women Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rehabilitation Interventions for Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency, and/or Urinary Frequency in Adult Women Running Gait Retraining in the Management of a Multiparous Runner With Chronic Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Case Study New Name, New Format! APTA 2023 Combined Sections Meeting Posters and Platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1