Relative uptake of organic and inorganic nitrogen by common weed species

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Weed Science Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1017/wsc.2023.48
Nicholas D. Warren, E. Hobbie, Janet Chen, Richard G. Smith
{"title":"Relative uptake of organic and inorganic nitrogen by common weed species","authors":"Nicholas D. Warren, E. Hobbie, Janet Chen, Richard G. Smith","doi":"10.1017/wsc.2023.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The extent to which weed species vary in their ability to acquire and use different forms of nitrogen (N) (inorganic and organic) has not been investigated but could have important implications for weed survival and weed-crop competition in agroecosystems. We conducted a controlled environment experiment using stable isotopes to determine the uptake and partitioning of organic and inorganic N (amino acids, ammonium, and nitrate) by seven common weed and non-weed species. All species took up inorganic and organic N, including as intact amino acids. Concentrations of 15N derived from both ammonium and amino acids in shoot tissues were higher in large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.] and barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv] than in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and sorghum-sudangrass [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench x S. bicolor ssp. drummondii (Nees ex Steud.) de Wet & Harlan]. In contrast, the concentration of 15N derived from nitrate was higher in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) shoots than in wild oat (Avena fatua L.) shoots. Root concentration of 15N derived from ammonium was lower in sorghum-sudangrass compared to other species except for A. retroflexus and A. fatua, while root concentration of 15N derived from nitrate was lower in A. retroflexus compared to other species except for C. album and S. arvensis. Discriminant analysis classified species based on their uptake and partitioning of all three labeled N forms. These results suggest that common agricultural weeds can access and use organic N and differentially take up inorganic N forms. Additional research is needed to determine whether species-specific differences in organic and inorganic N uptake influence the intensity of competition for soil N.","PeriodicalId":23688,"journal":{"name":"Weed Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2023.48","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent to which weed species vary in their ability to acquire and use different forms of nitrogen (N) (inorganic and organic) has not been investigated but could have important implications for weed survival and weed-crop competition in agroecosystems. We conducted a controlled environment experiment using stable isotopes to determine the uptake and partitioning of organic and inorganic N (amino acids, ammonium, and nitrate) by seven common weed and non-weed species. All species took up inorganic and organic N, including as intact amino acids. Concentrations of 15N derived from both ammonium and amino acids in shoot tissues were higher in large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.] and barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv] than in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and sorghum-sudangrass [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench x S. bicolor ssp. drummondii (Nees ex Steud.) de Wet & Harlan]. In contrast, the concentration of 15N derived from nitrate was higher in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) shoots than in wild oat (Avena fatua L.) shoots. Root concentration of 15N derived from ammonium was lower in sorghum-sudangrass compared to other species except for A. retroflexus and A. fatua, while root concentration of 15N derived from nitrate was lower in A. retroflexus compared to other species except for C. album and S. arvensis. Discriminant analysis classified species based on their uptake and partitioning of all three labeled N forms. These results suggest that common agricultural weeds can access and use organic N and differentially take up inorganic N forms. Additional research is needed to determine whether species-specific differences in organic and inorganic N uptake influence the intensity of competition for soil N.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常见杂草对有机氮和无机氮的相对吸收
杂草物种在获取和利用不同形式的氮(无机和有机)的能力方面的差异程度尚未得到调查,但可能对农业生态系统中的杂草生存和杂草作物竞争具有重要意义。我们使用稳定同位素进行了一项受控环境实验,以确定七种常见杂草和非杂草对有机和无机氮(氨基酸、铵和硝酸盐)的吸收和分配。所有物种都吸收无机和有机氮,包括完整的氨基酸。来源于芽组织中铵和氨基酸的15N的浓度在大型蟹甲草[Digitaria sanganalis(L.)Scop.]和Barnyardrass[Echinochloa crus galli(L.)P.Beauv]中高于常见的羔羊草(Chenopodium album L.)、复根猪草(Amaranthus retroflexus L.)和高粱苏丹草[Saughum bicolor(L.)Moench x S.bicolor ssp.drummondii(Nees ex Steud)。)de Wet&Harlan]。相反,野生芥菜(Sinapis arvensis L.)芽中来源于硝酸盐的15N浓度高于野生燕麦(Avena fatua L.)芽。与除A.retroflexus和A.fatua外的其他物种相比,高粱苏丹草中铵源性15N的根浓度较低,而A.retroflus中硝酸盐源性15氮的根浓度低于除C.album和S.arvensis外的其他品种。判别分析根据物种对所有三种标记N形式的吸收和分配对物种进行分类。这些结果表明,常见的农业杂草可以获得和利用有机氮,并不同程度地吸收无机氮。还需要进一步的研究来确定物种在有机和无机氮吸收方面的差异是否会影响对土壤氮的竞争强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Science
Weed Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Science publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on fundamental research directly related to all aspects of weed science in agricultural systems. Topics for Weed Science include: - the biology and ecology of weeds in agricultural, forestry, aquatic, turf, recreational, rights-of-way and other settings, genetics of weeds - herbicide resistance, chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and molecular action of herbicides and plant growth regulators used to manage undesirable vegetation - ecology of cropping and other agricultural systems as they relate to weed management - biological and ecological aspects of weed control tools including biological agents, and herbicide resistant crops - effect of weed management on soil, air and water.
期刊最新文献
Impact of burial depth and root segment length on vegetative propagation of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) How are weeds named: A committee review of the WSSA composite list of names Effects of Bed Width and Crop Row Spacing on Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) Emergence and Seed Production in Furrow-Irrigated Rice Investigating sexual and asexual modes of reproduction in Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Known and potential benefits of applying herbicides with glutathione S-transferase inhibitors and inducers – a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1