Validation of the applicability of the particle-based open-source software DualSPHysics to violent flow fields

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/21664250.2021.1991608
Kenta Sato, K. Kawasaki, Ken Watanabe, S. Koshimura
{"title":"Validation of the applicability of the particle-based open-source software DualSPHysics to violent flow fields","authors":"Kenta Sato, K. Kawasaki, Ken Watanabe, S. Koshimura","doi":"10.1080/21664250.2021.1991608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Emerging as powerful open-source software in recent years, “DualSPHysics” is receiving increased attention for its ability to simulate large-scale flow fields. In the context of applying open-source software, the differences in the numerical results due to different model parameters need to be investigated in detail. In this study, some benchmark problems have been solved with DualSPHysics to validate the estimation of wave impact pressure with violent breaking waves. We have demonstrated three main results: (i) as an alternative to the artificial viscosity traditionally used in DualSPHysics, a laminar viscosity model can also well reproduce the solutions to the existing benchmark problems in a violent flow field with the modified dynamic boundary condition; (ii) the dynamics of the gas phase is essential in the calculation of wave breaking with rapid gate opening; and (iii) if the density diffusion parameter is too large, the impact pressure may be underestimated. The practical contribution by this study is to find that DualSPHysics well reproduces complex breaking waves, including multi-phase gas-liquid flows, and that the wave impact pressure is accurate by comparison with existing experimental results. This allows us to understand the complex behavior of fluid-structure interactions in coastal engineering by means of DualSPHysics.","PeriodicalId":50673,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering Journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"545 - 572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2021.1991608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Emerging as powerful open-source software in recent years, “DualSPHysics” is receiving increased attention for its ability to simulate large-scale flow fields. In the context of applying open-source software, the differences in the numerical results due to different model parameters need to be investigated in detail. In this study, some benchmark problems have been solved with DualSPHysics to validate the estimation of wave impact pressure with violent breaking waves. We have demonstrated three main results: (i) as an alternative to the artificial viscosity traditionally used in DualSPHysics, a laminar viscosity model can also well reproduce the solutions to the existing benchmark problems in a violent flow field with the modified dynamic boundary condition; (ii) the dynamics of the gas phase is essential in the calculation of wave breaking with rapid gate opening; and (iii) if the density diffusion parameter is too large, the impact pressure may be underestimated. The practical contribution by this study is to find that DualSPHysics well reproduces complex breaking waves, including multi-phase gas-liquid flows, and that the wave impact pressure is accurate by comparison with existing experimental results. This allows us to understand the complex behavior of fluid-structure interactions in coastal engineering by means of DualSPHysics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证基于粒子的开源软件DualSPHysics对剧烈流场的适用性
作为近年来兴起的强大的开源软件,“dualspphysics”因其模拟大尺度流场的能力而受到越来越多的关注。在应用开源软件的情况下,需要详细研究不同模型参数导致的数值结果差异。在本研究中,利用dualspphysics解决了一些基准问题,验证了猛烈破碎波对波浪冲击压力的估计。我们展示了三个主要结果:(i)层流黏度模型可以替代传统的dualspphysics中使用的人工黏度模型,在修正的动态边界条件下,层流黏度模型也可以很好地再现现有的强流场基准问题的解;(ii)气相动力学在计算快速开闸破波时是必不可少的;(3)如果密度扩散参数过大,可能会低估冲击压力。本研究的实际贡献在于发现dualspphysics可以很好地再现复杂的破碎波,包括多相气液流动,并且通过与现有实验结果的比较,波浪冲击压力是准确的。这使我们能够利用双物理来理解海岸工程中流固相互作用的复杂行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering Journal
Coastal Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering Journal is a peer-reviewed medium for the publication of research achievements and engineering practices in the fields of coastal, harbor and offshore engineering. The CEJ editors welcome original papers and comprehensive reviews on waves and currents, sediment motion and morphodynamics, as well as on structures and facilities. Reports on conceptual developments and predictive methods of environmental processes are also published. Topics also include hard and soft technologies related to coastal zone development, shore protection, and prevention or mitigation of coastal disasters. The journal is intended to cover not only fundamental studies on analytical models, numerical computation and laboratory experiments, but also results of field measurements and case studies of real projects.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of climate change and climate variability impacts on coastal storms induced by extratropical cyclones: a case study of the August 2015 storm in central Chile Millennial and contemporary dynamics of the barrier estuary entrance at Moruya, SE Australia An automatic shoreline extraction method from SAR imagery using DeepLab-v3+ and its versatility Long-term erosion at the north of Hatiya Island in the Lower Meghna Estuary, Bangladesh Performance Evaluation of XBeach for Seawater-Aquifer Interaction Simulation in Swash Zone of Gravel Beach: An Attempt to Reduce the Phase Errors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1