One hundred years of the cosmological constant: from “superfluous stunt” to dark energy

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE The European Physical Journal H Pub Date : 2018-03-16 DOI:10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7
Cormac O’Raifeartaigh, Michael O’Keeffe, Werner Nahm, Simon Mitton
{"title":"One hundred years of the cosmological constant: from “superfluous stunt” to dark energy","authors":"Cormac O’Raifeartaigh,&nbsp;Michael O’Keeffe,&nbsp;Werner Nahm,&nbsp;Simon Mitton","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\nWe present a centennial review of the history of the term known as the cosmological constant. First introduced to the general theory of relativity by Einstein in 1917 in order to describe a universe that was assumed to be static, the term fell from favour in the wake of the discovery of the expanding universe, only to make a dramatic return in recent times. We consider historical and philosophical aspects of the cosmological constant over four main epochs; (i) the use of the term in static cosmologies (both Newtonian and relativistic): (ii) the marginalization of the term following the discovery of cosmic expansion: (iii) the use of the term to address specific cosmic puzzles such as the timespan of expansion, the formation of galaxies and the redshifts of the quasars: (iv) the re-emergence of the term in today’s Λ-CDM cosmology. We find that the cosmological constant was never truly banished from theoretical models of the universe, but was marginalized by astronomers for reasons of convenience. We also find that the return of the term to the forefront of modern cosmology did not occur as an abrupt paradigm shift due to one particular set of observations, but as the result of a number of empirical advances such as the measurement of present cosmic expansion using the Hubble Space Telescope, the measurement of past expansion using type SN Ia supernovae as standard candles, and the measurement of perturbations in the cosmic microwave background by balloon and satellite. We give a brief overview of contemporary interpretations of the physics underlying the cosmic constant and conclude with a synopsis of the famous <i>cosmological constant problem</i>.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"43 1","pages":"73 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal H","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

We present a centennial review of the history of the term known as the cosmological constant. First introduced to the general theory of relativity by Einstein in 1917 in order to describe a universe that was assumed to be static, the term fell from favour in the wake of the discovery of the expanding universe, only to make a dramatic return in recent times. We consider historical and philosophical aspects of the cosmological constant over four main epochs; (i) the use of the term in static cosmologies (both Newtonian and relativistic): (ii) the marginalization of the term following the discovery of cosmic expansion: (iii) the use of the term to address specific cosmic puzzles such as the timespan of expansion, the formation of galaxies and the redshifts of the quasars: (iv) the re-emergence of the term in today’s Λ-CDM cosmology. We find that the cosmological constant was never truly banished from theoretical models of the universe, but was marginalized by astronomers for reasons of convenience. We also find that the return of the term to the forefront of modern cosmology did not occur as an abrupt paradigm shift due to one particular set of observations, but as the result of a number of empirical advances such as the measurement of present cosmic expansion using the Hubble Space Telescope, the measurement of past expansion using type SN Ia supernovae as standard candles, and the measurement of perturbations in the cosmic microwave background by balloon and satellite. We give a brief overview of contemporary interpretations of the physics underlying the cosmic constant and conclude with a synopsis of the famous cosmological constant problem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
百年宇宙常数:从“多余的特技”到暗能量
我们提出了一个百年回顾的历史上的术语被称为宇宙常数。1917年,爱因斯坦首次将这个词引入广义相对论,以描述一个被认为是静态的宇宙。随着宇宙膨胀的发现,这个词不再受欢迎,只是在最近才戏剧性地重新流行起来。我们考虑四个主要时期的宇宙常数的历史和哲学方面;(i)静态宇宙学(牛顿宇宙学和相对论宇宙学)对该术语的使用;(ii)在发现宇宙膨胀之后,该术语被边缘化;(iii)使用该术语来解决特定的宇宙难题,如膨胀的时间跨度、星系的形成和类星体的红移;(iv)该术语在今天的Λ-CDM宇宙学中重新出现。我们发现,宇宙常数从来没有真正从宇宙的理论模型中被排除,而是由于方便的原因被天文学家边缘化了。我们还发现,这个术语回到现代宇宙学的前沿,并不是由于一组特定的观测结果而突然发生的范式转变,而是许多经验进步的结果,例如使用哈勃太空望远镜测量当前的宇宙膨胀,使用SN Ia型超新星作为标准蜡烛测量过去的膨胀,以及使用气球和卫星测量宇宙微波背景中的扰动。我们简要概述了当代对宇宙常数背后的物理学解释,并以著名的宇宙常数问题的概要结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal H
The European Physical Journal H HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of this journal is to catalyse, foster, and disseminate an awareness and understanding of the historical development of ideas in contemporary physics, and more generally, ideas about how Nature works. The scope explicitly includes: - Contributions addressing the history of physics and of physical ideas and concepts, the interplay of physics and mathematics as well as the natural sciences, and the history and philosophy of sciences, together with discussions of experimental ideas and designs - inasmuch as they clearly relate, and preferably add, to the understanding of modern physics. - Annotated and/or contextual translations of relevant foreign-language texts. - Careful characterisations of old and/or abandoned ideas including past mistakes and false leads, thereby helping working physicists to assess how compelling contemporary ideas may turn out to be in future, i.e. with hindsight.
期刊最新文献
Equilibria and the protomodel of the Sun’s atmosphere by Karl Schwarzschild in hindsight A commented translation of Boltzmann’s work, “Ueber die sogenannte H-Curve.” Bohr and von Neumann on the universality of quantum mechanics: materials for the history of the quantum measurement process From history of physics to “history for physics” The drama of ideas in the history of quantum gravity: Niels Bohr, Lev Landau, and Matvei Bronstein
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1