Samuel Beckett’s Brush with Ballet

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 DANCE Dance Research Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.3366/drs.2022.0365
Susan E. Jones
{"title":"Samuel Beckett’s Brush with Ballet","authors":"Susan E. Jones","doi":"10.3366/drs.2022.0365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Samuel Beckett’s encounter with the aesthetics of ballet has not been fully acknowledged for its impact on his writing. Yet throughout his life Beckett investigated problems of kinaesthetics, and the mechanics of human movement was inspired by his reading of the seventeenth-century Cartesian philosopher Arnold Geulincx (1624–1669), reflected initially in Beckett’s novel Murphy (1938). At the same time, Beckett’s interest in the specificities of physical movement also derives from his spectatorship of, and comments on Petrouchka and other ballets in 1934–5, performed in London by the Ballets Russes de Monte Carlo and Polish Ballet. Beckett’s subsequent meeting with a British ballet dancer, Deryk Mendel, working in Paris in the fifties, sustained this focus. Mendel was immersed in the burgeoning development of French mime and new movement forms, and Beckett created the mime Acte sans paroles (1957) for him. Mendel subsequently worked with Beckett as performer and director, including the first transmission of Eh Joe ( He Joe!, 1966) for German TV. Beckett’s encounter with Mendel consolidated his interest in the puppet figure of Petrouchka and initiated an enduring exploration of choreographic forms throughout his late work. His direction of his own plays in the 70s and 80s frequently focused on the rhythm and pacing of movement, spatial disposition of figures on stage, and latterly Beckett revitalized the enduring resonances of his encounters with ballet in a uniquely choreographic style for the performers of his late work.","PeriodicalId":42392,"journal":{"name":"Dance Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/drs.2022.0365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"DANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Samuel Beckett’s encounter with the aesthetics of ballet has not been fully acknowledged for its impact on his writing. Yet throughout his life Beckett investigated problems of kinaesthetics, and the mechanics of human movement was inspired by his reading of the seventeenth-century Cartesian philosopher Arnold Geulincx (1624–1669), reflected initially in Beckett’s novel Murphy (1938). At the same time, Beckett’s interest in the specificities of physical movement also derives from his spectatorship of, and comments on Petrouchka and other ballets in 1934–5, performed in London by the Ballets Russes de Monte Carlo and Polish Ballet. Beckett’s subsequent meeting with a British ballet dancer, Deryk Mendel, working in Paris in the fifties, sustained this focus. Mendel was immersed in the burgeoning development of French mime and new movement forms, and Beckett created the mime Acte sans paroles (1957) for him. Mendel subsequently worked with Beckett as performer and director, including the first transmission of Eh Joe ( He Joe!, 1966) for German TV. Beckett’s encounter with Mendel consolidated his interest in the puppet figure of Petrouchka and initiated an enduring exploration of choreographic forms throughout his late work. His direction of his own plays in the 70s and 80s frequently focused on the rhythm and pacing of movement, spatial disposition of figures on stage, and latterly Beckett revitalized the enduring resonances of his encounters with ballet in a uniquely choreographic style for the performers of his late work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞缪尔·贝克特的芭蕾笔触
塞缪尔·贝克特与芭蕾舞美学的相遇并没有因为其对他的写作的影响而得到充分承认。然而,贝克特一生都在研究心理美学问题,人类运动机制的灵感来自他对17世纪笛卡尔哲学家阿诺德·盖林克斯(1624-1669)的阅读,这最初反映在贝克特的小说《墨菲》(1938)中。同时,贝克特对身体运动特殊性的兴趣也源于他对1934–5年由蒙特卡洛芭蕾舞团和波兰芭蕾舞团在伦敦演出的《彼得鲁奇卡》和其他芭蕾舞剧的观察和评论。贝克特随后与50年代在巴黎工作的英国芭蕾舞演员德里克·孟德尔会面,延续了这一焦点。孟德尔沉浸在法国哑剧和新运动形式的蓬勃发展中,贝克特为他创作了《无戏仿哑剧》(1957)。随后,孟德尔与贝克特合作担任演员和导演,包括为德国电视台首播《Eh Joe》(《He Joe!》,1966年)。贝克特与孟德尔的相遇巩固了他对彼得鲁奇卡木偶形象的兴趣,并在其后期作品中开始了对舞蹈形式的持久探索。在70年代和80年代,他对自己戏剧的指导经常集中在动作的节奏和节奏、舞台上人物的空间布局上,最近,贝克特以一种独特的舞蹈风格为他晚期作品的表演者重新唤起了他与芭蕾舞相遇时的持久共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Bruce Baird, A History of Butô Performing for Napoleon: Production Quarrels at the Paris Opéra Ecosystemic Practice-Research (for the Benefit of Others) Grace Barnes, National Identity and the British Musical So Revealing: Ballerinas on Antebellum US Stages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1