The History of the Dead God – The Genesis of ‘the Death of God’ in Philosophy and Literature Before Nietzsche

Q4 Arts and Humanities Pro-Fil Pub Date : 2020-12-17 DOI:10.5817/pf20-2-2178
Břetislav Horyna
{"title":"The History of the Dead God – The Genesis of ‘the Death of God’ in Philosophy and Literature Before Nietzsche","authors":"Břetislav Horyna","doi":"10.5817/pf20-2-2178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few of the statements penned by philosophers have become as infamous as the “God is Dead!” of Friedrich Nietzsche. This study is not concerned with the reasons why this phrase is so popular. Instead, I would like to delve into the prehistory and partial genesis of the concept, something Nietzsche adopted from a previous tradition. Apart from known examples of theses on the death of God by Hegel, Schelling or Jean Paul, I will shed light on some of the confusion surrounding the phrase  deus est mortuus  in Mediaeval Christian liturgical literature and mysticism, with roots reaching back to Neoplatonism. The goal of this study is to point out that this phrase about the death of God had no significant constitutive meaning for Nietzsche but was, instead, a relatively common literary and rhetorical  topos among other culturally diagnostic expressive elements. Nietzsche used it as an illustrative shortcut when describing the intercultural processes of his time, with no ambition to originality, instead, with the clear intention of shaking up the (non)thought of the comfortable bureaucrats and legalistic petit bourgeois of Germany in the late 19th century.","PeriodicalId":53428,"journal":{"name":"Pro-Fil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-Fil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/pf20-2-2178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Few of the statements penned by philosophers have become as infamous as the “God is Dead!” of Friedrich Nietzsche. This study is not concerned with the reasons why this phrase is so popular. Instead, I would like to delve into the prehistory and partial genesis of the concept, something Nietzsche adopted from a previous tradition. Apart from known examples of theses on the death of God by Hegel, Schelling or Jean Paul, I will shed light on some of the confusion surrounding the phrase  deus est mortuus  in Mediaeval Christian liturgical literature and mysticism, with roots reaching back to Neoplatonism. The goal of this study is to point out that this phrase about the death of God had no significant constitutive meaning for Nietzsche but was, instead, a relatively common literary and rhetorical  topos among other culturally diagnostic expressive elements. Nietzsche used it as an illustrative shortcut when describing the intercultural processes of his time, with no ambition to originality, instead, with the clear intention of shaking up the (non)thought of the comfortable bureaucrats and legalistic petit bourgeois of Germany in the late 19th century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死亡上帝的历史——尼采之前哲学与文学中“上帝之死”的起源
很少有哲学家写过像“上帝死了!”弗里德里希·尼采的名言。这项研究并不关心这个短语如此流行的原因。相反,我想深入研究这个概念的史前和部分起源,这是尼采从之前的传统中采纳的东西。除了已知的黑格尔、谢林或让·保罗关于上帝之死的论文外,我将阐明围绕中世纪基督教礼拜文学和神秘主义中“deus est mortuus”一词的一些困惑,这些困惑的根源可以追溯到新柏拉图主义。本研究的目的是指出,这个关于上帝之死的短语对尼采来说没有重要的构成意义,相反,在其他文化诊断表达元素中,它是一个相对常见的文学和修辞主题。尼采在描述他那个时代的跨文化过程时,用它作为一个说明性的捷径,没有雄心勃勃地追求独创性,相反,他的明确意图是动摇19世纪后期德国安逸的官僚主义和法律主义小资产阶级的(非)思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pro-Fil
Pro-Fil Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Electronic journal of philosophy Pro-Fil is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles addressing a whole range of philosophical topics as well as contributions from natural sciences focusing on philosophically relevant issues. We welcome original papers, reviews, polemics, interviews, abstracts, announcements, audio and video recordings of lectures as well as instructional and educational materials in Czech, Slovak, English, and German.
期刊最新文献
“A Crowd of Gorgons and Winged Horses”. A Critique of Socratic Philosophers in Athenaeus’ The Deipnosophists The Spectrality of Shame in Plato’s Menexenus The Social, Therapeutic and Didactic Dimension of Shame in Seneca’s Thinking Heinrich Heine: Předposlední dny bohů Spinoza’s Model of God: Pantheism or Panentheism?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1