Extrauterine Growth Restriction among Very Low Birth Weight Neonate using Intergrowth 21st in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study

S. Panda, B. Meher, Pravati Jena, D. Pradhan, S. Priyadarshini
{"title":"Extrauterine Growth Restriction among Very Low Birth Weight Neonate using Intergrowth 21st in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study","authors":"S. Panda, B. Meher, Pravati Jena, D. Pradhan, S. Priyadarshini","doi":"10.3126/jnps.v42i1.41526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is a universal problem but its prevalence using recent reference growth charts and morbidities associated with it are lacking. The study aims at estimating EUGR prevalence in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates and its associated morbidities.\nMethods: All VLBW neonates admitted to NICU between Jan 2018 to June 2019 were analysed. Neonatal anthropometries were recorded on Intergrowth 21st gender based postnatal growth chart. EUGR was defined by weight below 10th percentile at discharge. Demographic profile and neonatal morbidities were compared between EUGR and non-EUGR by using unpaired t test and Chi-square test. Regression was used for identification of the risk factors.\nResults: Out of 148 VLBW neonates, 92 (62.1%) were male, 26 (17.56%) were below 1000 gm, 102 (68%) were EUGR at discharge. Mean (SD) birth weight and gestational age were 1202 (221) gms and 30.89 (2.77) wks respectively. Caesarean delivery, higher gestational age, lower birth weight, SGA at birth and prolonged duration to achieve full enteral feeding were significantly associated with EUGR (P < 0.05). Sepsis was significantly associated with EUGR (36.28% vs. 17.4%; P 0.022). EUGR babies needed longer hospital duration (24.56% vs. 16.78%; P 0.005) with a higher mean PMA at discharge (38.07 wks vs. 35.11 wks; P < 0.001). In regression model SGA at birth and delay in achieving full feeding were independent predictor of EUGR.\n Conclusions: In VLBW neonate, prevalence of EUGR at discharge was 68%. Sepsis was significantly associated with EUGR. SGA and delay in achieving full feeding were independent predictors of EUGR.","PeriodicalId":39140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v42i1.41526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is a universal problem but its prevalence using recent reference growth charts and morbidities associated with it are lacking. The study aims at estimating EUGR prevalence in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates and its associated morbidities. Methods: All VLBW neonates admitted to NICU between Jan 2018 to June 2019 were analysed. Neonatal anthropometries were recorded on Intergrowth 21st gender based postnatal growth chart. EUGR was defined by weight below 10th percentile at discharge. Demographic profile and neonatal morbidities were compared between EUGR and non-EUGR by using unpaired t test and Chi-square test. Regression was used for identification of the risk factors. Results: Out of 148 VLBW neonates, 92 (62.1%) were male, 26 (17.56%) were below 1000 gm, 102 (68%) were EUGR at discharge. Mean (SD) birth weight and gestational age were 1202 (221) gms and 30.89 (2.77) wks respectively. Caesarean delivery, higher gestational age, lower birth weight, SGA at birth and prolonged duration to achieve full enteral feeding were significantly associated with EUGR (P < 0.05). Sepsis was significantly associated with EUGR (36.28% vs. 17.4%; P 0.022). EUGR babies needed longer hospital duration (24.56% vs. 16.78%; P 0.005) with a higher mean PMA at discharge (38.07 wks vs. 35.11 wks; P < 0.001). In regression model SGA at birth and delay in achieving full feeding were independent predictor of EUGR. Conclusions: In VLBW neonate, prevalence of EUGR at discharge was 68%. Sepsis was significantly associated with EUGR. SGA and delay in achieving full feeding were independent predictors of EUGR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿重症监护室使用Intergrowth 21st对极低出生体重新生儿子宫外生长限制的回顾性研究
引言:子宫外生长受限(EUGR)是一个普遍存在的问题,但使用最近的参考生长图及其相关的发病率缺乏。该研究旨在估计极低出生体重(VLBW)新生儿的EUGR患病率及其相关疾病。方法:对2018年1月至2019年6月入住新生儿重症监护室的所有极低出生体重新生儿进行分析。新生儿的人体测量记录在Intergrowth 21基于性别的产后生长图上。EUGR定义为出院时体重低于第10百分位。采用不配对t检验和卡方检验比较EUGR和非EUGR的人口统计学特征和新生儿发病率。采用回归法对危险因素进行识别。结果:在148例极低出生体重新生儿中,92例(62.1%)为男性,26例(17.56%)低于1000克,102例(68%)出院时为EUGR。平均出生体重和胎龄分别为1202(221)克和30.89(2.77)周。剖腹产,较高的胎龄,较低的出生体重,出生时的SGA和长时间实现全肠内喂养与EUGR显著相关(P<0.05)。败血症与EUGR明显相关(36.28%对17.4%;P 0.022)。EUGR婴儿需要更长的住院时间(24.56%对16.78%;P 0.005),出院时的平均PMA更高(38.07周对35.11周;P<0.001)。在回归模型中,出生时SGA和延迟实现完全喂养是EUGR的独立预测因子。结论:极低出生体重新生儿出院时发生EUGR的发生率为68%。脓毒症与EUGR显著相关。SGA和延迟完全进食是EUGR的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society
Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mild Encephalopathy with Reversible Splenic Lesions in an Infant with COVID-19 Diagnostic Accuracy of Haematological Scoring System in Paired cord Blood and Peripheral Venous Blood for early Detection of Neonatal Sepsis – A Prospective Analytical Study Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Distraction Technique in Reduction of Pain Among Preschool Children Undergoing Vein Puncture Spectrum of Paediatric Dermatoses in a Private Medical College Behavioural Profile, Linguistic skills, Adaptive Behaviours and Intellectual Functioning of School aged Children with History of Early Language Delay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1