Comparison of Fracturing Treatment Design with an in-house Code, MFrac and FracPro

Q4 Energy Improved Oil and Gas Recovery Pub Date : 2019-08-15 DOI:10.14800/iogr.426
Shanshan Liu
{"title":"Comparison of Fracturing Treatment Design with an in-house Code, MFrac and FracPro","authors":"Shanshan Liu","doi":"10.14800/iogr.426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydraulic fracturing software is widely used in our industry nowadays for fracturing treatment design. Some of them are fracturing simulators that can actually mimic fracture growth while some kind is solely for treatment design. Although being different, they can provide reasonable ultimate fracture geometry and design procedure. This project aims to compare design results from three different fracturing software. Four case scenarios are studied, which involve sensitivity of consistency index of fracturing fluid, out-of-zone fluid loss multiplier, minimum horizontal stress and reservoir permeability. Each parameter is studied with individual software without interference. Results from this project can help users to understand how to cope with design changes when there is dramatic input change.","PeriodicalId":52731,"journal":{"name":"Improved Oil and Gas Recovery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improved Oil and Gas Recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14800/iogr.426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing software is widely used in our industry nowadays for fracturing treatment design. Some of them are fracturing simulators that can actually mimic fracture growth while some kind is solely for treatment design. Although being different, they can provide reasonable ultimate fracture geometry and design procedure. This project aims to compare design results from three different fracturing software. Four case scenarios are studied, which involve sensitivity of consistency index of fracturing fluid, out-of-zone fluid loss multiplier, minimum horizontal stress and reservoir permeability. Each parameter is studied with individual software without interference. Results from this project can help users to understand how to cope with design changes when there is dramatic input change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MFrac和FracPro内部规范压裂处理设计的比较
水力压裂软件在压裂工艺设计中被广泛应用。其中一些是压裂模拟器,实际上可以模拟裂缝的生长,而另一些则完全用于治疗设计。尽管它们不同,但都可以提供合理的最终裂缝几何形状和设计程序。该项目旨在比较三种不同压裂软件的设计结果。研究了压裂液稠度指数敏感性、层外滤失系数敏感性、最小水平应力敏感性和储层渗透率敏感性4种情景。每个参数用单独的软件进行研究,互不干扰。这个项目的结果可以帮助用户了解当输入发生巨大变化时如何应对设计变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Improved Oil and Gas Recovery
Improved Oil and Gas Recovery Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Numerical Investigation of the Most Affecting Parameters on Foam Flooding Performance in Carbonate Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Correction to: Application Of Numerical Well Testing In Strong Anisotropic Sandstone Gas Field Minimum Miscibility Pressure Prediction Method Based On PSO-GBDT Model A Comparative Study on Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Petroleum Production Forecasting Smart Seismic Modeling - Artificial Intelligence in the Petroleum Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1