Seeking truth in personality science: reconciling trait theory and psychological type

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Mental Health Religion & Culture Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1080/13674676.2022.2158794
J. B. Lloyd
{"title":"Seeking truth in personality science: reconciling trait theory and psychological type","authors":"J. B. Lloyd","doi":"10.1080/13674676.2022.2158794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Two rival paradigms compete for acceptance as representing objective reality concerning the structure of the human personality: the Five-Factor (Trait) model and the Myers-Briggs (Type) model. In this review, the common features of the two schemes are identified and the points of difference examined. It is concluded that a harmonised scheme could be achieved if both sides gave some ground. The Type community could relinquish its contention that every individual has a clear either-or preference for (for example) Extraversion or Introversion. It could also acknowledge the speculative nature of Type Dynamics. The Trait community could relinquish the value-judgements inherent in its current scheme and accept that (for example) introversion is not merely a deficit of extraversion but a distinct quality with positive potential. Given the many similarities of the two present paradigms, a unified approach would have a good claim to be the best current portrayal of personality.","PeriodicalId":47614,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Religion & Culture","volume":"25 1","pages":"817 - 828"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Religion & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2022.2158794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two rival paradigms compete for acceptance as representing objective reality concerning the structure of the human personality: the Five-Factor (Trait) model and the Myers-Briggs (Type) model. In this review, the common features of the two schemes are identified and the points of difference examined. It is concluded that a harmonised scheme could be achieved if both sides gave some ground. The Type community could relinquish its contention that every individual has a clear either-or preference for (for example) Extraversion or Introversion. It could also acknowledge the speculative nature of Type Dynamics. The Trait community could relinquish the value-judgements inherent in its current scheme and accept that (for example) introversion is not merely a deficit of extraversion but a distinct quality with positive potential. Given the many similarities of the two present paradigms, a unified approach would have a good claim to be the best current portrayal of personality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格科学中的求真:特质理论与心理类型的调和
五因素(特质)模型和迈尔斯-布里格斯(类型)模型是关于人格结构的两种相互对立的范式,它们在代表客观现实方面相互竞争。在这篇综述中,确定了两种方案的共同特点,并检查了不同点。结论是,如果双方都做出一些让步,一个协调的方案是可以实现的。类型社区可以放弃他们的论点,即每个人都有一个明确的非此即彼的偏好(例如)外向或内向。它也可以承认类型动力学的推测性质。特质团体可以放弃其现有方案中固有的价值判断,并接受(例如)内向不仅仅是外向的缺陷,而是具有积极潜力的独特品质。考虑到目前两种范式的许多相似之处,统一的方法有理由被认为是目前对人格的最佳描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Exploring the factor structure of the adolescent form of the Francis Psychological Type and Emotional Temperament Scales (FPTETSA) among Canadian Baptist youth: full form and short form Mindfulness and mystical experiences in Sufis and non-Sufis Validity and reliability of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale in Lebanese people during the pandemic Strengthening spiritual and cultural approaches in managing mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic The development and validation of the COVID-19 Depression Scale (COVID-19DS): association with the Perceived Health-Related Components Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1