An Evaluation of Automatic Item Generation: A Case Study of Weak Theory Approach

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2022-10-06 DOI:10.1111/emip.12529
Yanyan Fu, Edison M. Choe, Hwanggyu Lim, Jaehwa Choi
{"title":"An Evaluation of Automatic Item Generation: A Case Study of Weak Theory Approach","authors":"Yanyan Fu,&nbsp;Edison M. Choe,&nbsp;Hwanggyu Lim,&nbsp;Jaehwa Choi","doi":"10.1111/emip.12529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This case study applied the <i>weak theory</i> of Automatic Item Generation (AIG) to generate isomorphic item instances (i.e., unique but psychometrically equivalent items) for a large-scale assessment. Three representative instances were selected from each item template (i.e., model) and pilot-tested. In addition, a new analytical framework, differential child item functioning (DCIF) analysis, based on the existing differential item functioning statistics, was applied to evaluate the psychometric equivalency of item instances within each template. The results showed that, out of 23 templates, nine successfully generated isomorphic instances, five required minor revisions to make them isomorphic, and the remaining templates required major modifications. The results and insights obtained from the AIG template development procedure may help item writers and psychometricians effectively develop and manage the templates that generate isomorphic instances.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":"41 4","pages":"10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case study applied the weak theory of Automatic Item Generation (AIG) to generate isomorphic item instances (i.e., unique but psychometrically equivalent items) for a large-scale assessment. Three representative instances were selected from each item template (i.e., model) and pilot-tested. In addition, a new analytical framework, differential child item functioning (DCIF) analysis, based on the existing differential item functioning statistics, was applied to evaluate the psychometric equivalency of item instances within each template. The results showed that, out of 23 templates, nine successfully generated isomorphic instances, five required minor revisions to make them isomorphic, and the remaining templates required major modifications. The results and insights obtained from the AIG template development procedure may help item writers and psychometricians effectively develop and manage the templates that generate isomorphic instances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
项目自动生成的评价:以弱理论方法为例
本案例研究应用弱自动项目生成理论(AIG)为大规模评估生成同构项目实例(即唯一但心理测量等效的项目)。从每个项目模板(即模型)中选择三个具有代表性的实例进行试点测试。此外,在现有差异项目功能统计的基础上,应用一个新的分析框架——差异儿童项目功能分析(DCIF)来评估每个模板中项目实例的心理等效性。结果表明,在23个模板中,9个成功地生成了同构实例,5个需要进行小的修改以使它们同构,其余的模板需要进行大的修改。从AIG模板开发过程中获得的结果和见解可以帮助项目编写者和心理测量学家有效地开发和管理生成同构实例的模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial Issue Cover On the Cover: Gendered Trajectories of Digital Literacy Development: Insights from a Longitudinal Cohort Study Digital Module 36: Applying Intersectionality Theory to Educational Measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1