Socioeconomic Disparities in Surgical Care for Congenital Hand Differences.

The Hand Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1177/15589447221092059
Christopher L Kalmar, Brian C Drolet
{"title":"Socioeconomic Disparities in Surgical Care for Congenital Hand Differences.","authors":"Christopher L Kalmar, Brian C Drolet","doi":"10.1177/15589447221092059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of socioeconomic factors on access to congenital hand surgery care, hospital admission charges, and analyze these geographic trends across regions of the country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study was conducted of congenital hand surgery performed in the United States from 2010 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Multivariate regression was used to analyze the impact of socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study interval, 5531 pediatric patients underwent corrective surgery for congenital hand differences, including syndactyly repair (n = 2439), polydactyly repair (n = 2826), and pollicization (n = 266). Patients underwent surgery at significantly earlier age when treated at above-median case volume hospitals (<i>P</i> < .001). Patients with above-median income (<i>P</i> < .001), non-white race (<i>P</i> < .001), commercial insurance (<i>P</i> < .001), living in an urban community (<i>P</i> < .001), and not living in an underserved area (<i>P</i> < .001) were more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Nearly half of patients chose to seek care at a distant hospital rather than the one locally available (49.5%, n = 1172). Of those choosing a distant hospital, most patients chose a higher-volume facility (80.9%, n = 948 of 1172). On multivariate regression, white patients were significantly more likely to choose a more distant, higher-volume hospital (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Socioeconomic and geographic factors significantly contribute to disparate access to congenital hand surgery across the country. Patients with higher socioeconomic status are more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Treatment at hospitals with higher case volume is associated with earlier age at surgery and decreased hospital admission charges.</p>","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"1 1","pages":"104-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447221092059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of socioeconomic factors on access to congenital hand surgery care, hospital admission charges, and analyze these geographic trends across regions of the country.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study was conducted of congenital hand surgery performed in the United States from 2010 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Multivariate regression was used to analyze the impact of socioeconomic factors.

Results: During the study interval, 5531 pediatric patients underwent corrective surgery for congenital hand differences, including syndactyly repair (n = 2439), polydactyly repair (n = 2826), and pollicization (n = 266). Patients underwent surgery at significantly earlier age when treated at above-median case volume hospitals (P < .001). Patients with above-median income (P < .001), non-white race (P < .001), commercial insurance (P < .001), living in an urban community (P < .001), and not living in an underserved area (P < .001) were more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Nearly half of patients chose to seek care at a distant hospital rather than the one locally available (49.5%, n = 1172). Of those choosing a distant hospital, most patients chose a higher-volume facility (80.9%, n = 948 of 1172). On multivariate regression, white patients were significantly more likely to choose a more distant, higher-volume hospital (P < .001).

Conclusions: Socioeconomic and geographic factors significantly contribute to disparate access to congenital hand surgery across the country. Patients with higher socioeconomic status are more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Treatment at hospitals with higher case volume is associated with earlier age at surgery and decreased hospital admission charges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天性手部差异外科护理中的社会经济差异。
背景本研究的目的是评估社会经济因素对获得先天性手部手术护理、住院费用的影响,并分析全国各地区的这些地理趋势。方法使用儿科健康信息系统对2010年至2020年在美国进行的先天性手部手术进行回顾性队列研究。采用多元回归分析社会经济因素的影响。结果在研究期间,5531名儿童患者因先天性手部差异接受了矫正手术,包括并指修复(n=2439)、多指修复(n=2826)和拇趾化(n=266)。在病例数高于中位数的医院接受治疗的患者年龄明显更早接受手术(P<.001)。收入高于中位数(P<0.001)、非白人(P<-001)、商业保险(P<001)、生活在城市社区(P<.01)和不生活在服务不足地区(P<.001)的患者更有可能在高容量医院接受治疗。近一半的患者选择在远处的医院而不是当地医院寻求治疗(49.5%,n=1172)。在那些选择远程医院的患者中,大多数患者选择了容量更大的医院(80.9%,n=948/1172)。在多变量回归分析中,白人患者更倾向于选择距离更远、容量更大的医院(P<.001)。结论社会经济和地理因素显著导致全国各地获得先天性手部手术的机会不同。社会经济地位较高的患者更有可能在高容量医院接受治疗。在病例量较高的医院接受治疗与手术年龄较早和住院费用降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Monteggia Fracture Outcomes: Acute to Chronic. Outcomes in Ballistic Injuries to the Hand: Fractures and Nerve/Tendon Damage as Predictors of Poor Outcomes. Predictors of Digital Amputation in Diabetic Patients With Surgically Treated Finger Infections. The Prevalence of Depression and PTSD in Adults With Surgically Managed Traumatic Upper-Extremity Amputations. Postoperative Functional Analysis of Double Crush Versus Single Peripheral Nerve Decompression: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1