Too Much Debt and Budget Deficit on Fiscal Sustainability: Do Institutions Matter?

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-26 DOI:10.22452/mjes.vol59no2.5
Cahyadin Malik, S. Tamat, Khalid Norlin, S. Law
{"title":"Too Much Debt and Budget Deficit on Fiscal Sustainability: Do Institutions Matter?","authors":"Cahyadin Malik, S. Tamat, Khalid Norlin, S. Law","doi":"10.22452/mjes.vol59no2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study estimates threshold levels of the public debt-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio and the budget deficit for 106 developing and 36 developed countries from 1996 to 2018. A PCA-based fiscal sustainability indicator is also constructed and a dynamic panel threshold regression is employed. The main findings reveal a threshold effect in the public debt-to-GDP ratio and budget deficit fiscal sustainability nexus. The public debt-to-GDP ratio and budget deficit are beneficial in maintaining fiscal sustainability at lower or upper threshold levels in different institutional indicators. The highest threshold level of the public debt-to-GDP ratio was 59.56% for developed countries and 64.87% for developing countries. The highest threshold level of budget deficit-to-GDP ratio was 0.41% for developed countries and 3.34% for developing countries. Three institutional indicators contribute significantly to the threshold estimation: regulatory quality, the rule of law and control of corruption. Policymakers are advised to maintain certain threshold points to ensure a fiscally sustainable level. The quality of law enforcement and control of corruption should also be improved.","PeriodicalId":42743,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjes.vol59no2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study estimates threshold levels of the public debt-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio and the budget deficit for 106 developing and 36 developed countries from 1996 to 2018. A PCA-based fiscal sustainability indicator is also constructed and a dynamic panel threshold regression is employed. The main findings reveal a threshold effect in the public debt-to-GDP ratio and budget deficit fiscal sustainability nexus. The public debt-to-GDP ratio and budget deficit are beneficial in maintaining fiscal sustainability at lower or upper threshold levels in different institutional indicators. The highest threshold level of the public debt-to-GDP ratio was 59.56% for developed countries and 64.87% for developing countries. The highest threshold level of budget deficit-to-GDP ratio was 0.41% for developed countries and 3.34% for developing countries. Three institutional indicators contribute significantly to the threshold estimation: regulatory quality, the rule of law and control of corruption. Policymakers are advised to maintain certain threshold points to ensure a fiscally sustainable level. The quality of law enforcement and control of corruption should also be improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过多的债务和预算赤字对财政可持续性的影响:制度重要吗?
目前的研究估计了1996年至2018年106个发展中国家和36个发达国家的公共债务与国内生产总值之比和预算赤字的阈值水平。构建了基于主成分分析的财政可持续性指标,并采用了动态面板阈值回归。主要研究结果揭示了公共债务与GDP之比和预算赤字与财政可持续性之间的阈值效应。公共债务与国内生产总值的比率和预算赤字有利于在不同的制度指标中将财政可持续性保持在较低或较高的阈值水平。发达国家的公共债务与国内生产总值之比的最高阈值水平为59.56%,发展中国家为64.87%。发达国家预算赤字与国内生产总值之比的最高阈值水平为0.41%,发展中国家为3.34%。三个制度指标对阈值估计有重要贡献:监管质量、法治和腐败控制。政策制定者被建议保持一定的临界点,以确保财政可持续水平。执法和控制腐败的质量也应该提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of the journal is to promote publications of original research related to the Malaysian economy. It is also designed to serve as an outlet for studies on the South-east Asian countries and the Asian region. The journal also considers high-quality works related to other regions that provide relevant policy lessons to Malaysia. The journal is receptive to papers in all areas of economics. We encourage specifically contributions on all range of economic topics of an applied or policy nature. At the same time, submissions of methodological or theoretical studies with results that are of practical use are welcome. Works that are interdisciplinary will be considered provided that they contain substantial economic contents.
期刊最新文献
Minimum Wage and Employment of Malaysian Low-skilled Workers Does Local Risk Still Matter in the Highly Liberalised Emerging Market of Malaysia? Effects of Government Expenditure on the Poverty Level: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach Including Public Realism in Determining New Pricing Scheme for Sanitary Landfill in Malaysia Does the Founder CEO Receive a Higher Pay for the Firm’s Performance? Evidence from Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1