Good Work is Good for Health: The Societal and Individual Perspective

C. Holmes, K. Walker-Bone
{"title":"Good Work is Good for Health: The Societal and Individual Perspective","authors":"C. Holmes, K. Walker-Bone","doi":"10.4172/2471-9846.1000189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neither public health nor traditional healthcare have generally concerned themselves with employment participation. Most of the outcomes we measure are health-related and in practice we rarely take note of the occupation of our patients or populations or consider the impact of our healthcare on their ability to work. \nMethods: We report the results of a study of current clinical practice involving patients receiving outpatient care for chronic long-term conditions. \nResults: Healthcare workers do not take their opportunities to discuss work participation with their patients. \nConclusion: Work participation needs more emphasis by healthcare commissioners and providers. The optimal way to achieve this would be for work participation to become a health outcome. Prioritisation of work would lead to important improvements in the health of individuals and societies.","PeriodicalId":92236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community & public health nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2471-9846.1000189","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community & public health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9846.1000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neither public health nor traditional healthcare have generally concerned themselves with employment participation. Most of the outcomes we measure are health-related and in practice we rarely take note of the occupation of our patients or populations or consider the impact of our healthcare on their ability to work. Methods: We report the results of a study of current clinical practice involving patients receiving outpatient care for chronic long-term conditions. Results: Healthcare workers do not take their opportunities to discuss work participation with their patients. Conclusion: Work participation needs more emphasis by healthcare commissioners and providers. The optimal way to achieve this would be for work participation to become a health outcome. Prioritisation of work would lead to important improvements in the health of individuals and societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
好的工作有益于健康:社会和个人的观点
背景:公共卫生和传统卫生保健一般都不关心就业参与。我们衡量的大多数结果都是与健康相关的,在实践中,我们很少注意到患者或人群的职业,也很少考虑我们的医疗保健对他们工作能力的影响。方法:我们报告了目前临床实践的研究结果,涉及接受门诊治疗的慢性长期疾病患者。结果:医护人员不利用他们的机会与他们的病人讨论工作参与。结论:卫生保健专员和医务人员应更加重视工作参与。实现这一目标的最佳途径是使工作参与成为一种健康成果。确定工作的优先次序将大大改善个人和社会的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complexity and Emergent Care Development of the model mobilizing nutrition health promotion and education in community The relationship between bullying and depression scales in the adolescent The associations among health literacy, diabetes self-management and glycemic control in older people with poorly controlled type-2 diabetes mellitus Taiwanese indigenous cancer survivors intent to advance care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1