Investigation of the Attitude and Perceptions of Anesthesiologist and General Practitioners on Referring Patients to Palliative Care Centers: A Survey Study

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2022.37167
Gülten Ütebey
{"title":"Investigation of the Attitude and Perceptions of Anesthesiologist and General Practitioners on Referring Patients to Palliative Care Centers: A Survey Study","authors":"Gülten Ütebey","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2022.37167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Physicians’ approaches are important in refering patients to palliative care centers (PCC). We aimed to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes of general practitioners and anesthesiologist on patient referral. Methods: Anesthesiologist and general practitioners were included in a face to face or telephone interview method survey; predefined written forms were used to collect data and results were analyzed. Results: The research was completed with 207 participants. Groups were different regarding their knowledge about PC, most of the general practitioners responded “I know a litle” and anesthesiologists responded “I know what it is, I can explain it to someone else” (p=0.002). The answers to the question of which patients should be referred to PCC (“End-stage cancer patients” [p=0.018], “Patients referred home care services” [p=0.003] and “Patients having chronic ilness without adequate symptom control” [p=0.004], “Patients having total parenteral nutrition” [p=0.001], “Precence of pressure ulcer” [p<0.001], “Patients refusing discharge” [p=0.037] ) were different between anesthesiologists and general practitioners. Conclusion: Anesthesiologists and general practitioners refer patients with different diagnoses and conditions to PCC and knowledge about patient referral to PC is different. Keywords: Palliative care, anesthesiologist, general practitioner, survey","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.37167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Physicians’ approaches are important in refering patients to palliative care centers (PCC). We aimed to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes of general practitioners and anesthesiologist on patient referral. Methods: Anesthesiologist and general practitioners were included in a face to face or telephone interview method survey; predefined written forms were used to collect data and results were analyzed. Results: The research was completed with 207 participants. Groups were different regarding their knowledge about PC, most of the general practitioners responded “I know a litle” and anesthesiologists responded “I know what it is, I can explain it to someone else” (p=0.002). The answers to the question of which patients should be referred to PCC (“End-stage cancer patients” [p=0.018], “Patients referred home care services” [p=0.003] and “Patients having chronic ilness without adequate symptom control” [p=0.004], “Patients having total parenteral nutrition” [p=0.001], “Precence of pressure ulcer” [p<0.001], “Patients refusing discharge” [p=0.037] ) were different between anesthesiologists and general practitioners. Conclusion: Anesthesiologists and general practitioners refer patients with different diagnoses and conditions to PCC and knowledge about patient referral to PC is different. Keywords: Palliative care, anesthesiologist, general practitioner, survey
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉医师和全科医师对转介病人到姑息治疗中心的态度和看法调查:一项调查研究
目的:医生的方法是重要的转介病人到姑息治疗中心(PCC)。我们旨在评估全科医生和麻醉师对患者转诊的看法和态度。方法:对麻醉医师和全科医生采用面对面或电话访谈法进行调查;使用预定义的书面表格收集数据并对结果进行分析。结果:共有207名参与者完成了这项研究。不同小组对PC的了解程度不同,大多数全科医生回答“我知道一点”,麻醉医生回答“我知道是什么,我可以向别人解释”(p=0.002)。在“终末期癌症患者”[p=0.018]、“转介家庭护理服务的患者”[p=0.003]、“有慢性疾病但症状控制不充分的患者”[p=0.004]、“接受全肠外营养的患者”[p=0.001]、“是否有压疮”[p<0.001]、“拒绝出院的患者”[p=0.037]等问题上,麻醉医师和全科医生的回答存在差异。结论:麻醉医师和全科医师对不同诊断和病情的患者转诊PCC的认识存在差异。关键词:姑息治疗,麻醉师,全科医生,调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1