Jsou rozdílné lhůty pro podání jednotlivých typů správních žalob překážkou na cestě k jednotné správní žalobě?

Q4 Social Sciences Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI:10.14712/23366478.2022.39
Daniel Codl
{"title":"Jsou rozdílné lhůty pro podání jednotlivých typů správních žalob překážkou na cestě k jednotné správní žalobě?","authors":"Daniel Codl","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2022.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thesis first deals with the current state of legal regulation of procedural time limits for filing lawsuits against a decision of an administrative body, for protection against inactivity of an administrative body and for protection against illegal intervention, instruction, or coercion of an administrative body. The issue of measures of a general nature is left aside, as they are rather similar to judicial review of legislation. The author concludes that although the issue of time limits is one of the key obstacles in examining the (im)possibility of introducing a universal administrative legal action, as it is not the only problem and therefore this question remains open. However, the current state of the legal deadlines de lege ferenda requires some improvements, in particular, the possibility of waiving a missed deadline and introducing more permeability between different types of actions by making the deadlines more standardized.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thesis first deals with the current state of legal regulation of procedural time limits for filing lawsuits against a decision of an administrative body, for protection against inactivity of an administrative body and for protection against illegal intervention, instruction, or coercion of an administrative body. The issue of measures of a general nature is left aside, as they are rather similar to judicial review of legislation. The author concludes that although the issue of time limits is one of the key obstacles in examining the (im)possibility of introducing a universal administrative legal action, as it is not the only problem and therefore this question remains open. However, the current state of the legal deadlines de lege ferenda requires some improvements, in particular, the possibility of waiving a missed deadline and introducing more permeability between different types of actions by making the deadlines more standardized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提起不同类型行政诉讼的不同时限是否是单一行政诉讼的障碍?
本文首先论述了对行政机构的决定提起诉讼的程序时限、对行政机构不作为的保护以及对行政机构非法干预、指示或胁迫的保护的法律规定现状。一般性措施的问题被搁置一边,因为它们相当类似于对立法的司法审查。提交人的结论是,尽管时限问题是审查采取普遍行政法律行动的可能性的主要障碍之一,因为这不是唯一的问题,因此这个问题仍然悬而未决。然而,拟议法的法律最后期限的现状需要一些改进,特别是放弃错过的最后期限的可能性,并通过使最后期限更加标准化,在不同类型的行动之间引入更多的渗透性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Z vědeckého života: zpráva z mezinárodní vědecké konference Opravné systémy a opravné prostředky v trestním řízení Koncept kontradiktornosti v trestním řízení Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu Využitelnost dohody o vině a trestu a prohlášení viny v jednotlivých stadiích trestního řízení Zajištění informací a věcí v návrhu nového trestního řádu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1