Rediscovery of the holotype of the American Goshawk, Accipiter gentilis atricapillus (Wilson, 1812), and a commentary about Alexander Wilson's contributions to the Peale Museum

IF 0.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Pub Date : 2022-01-26 DOI:10.1635/053.167.0114
Matthew R. Halley
{"title":"Rediscovery of the holotype of the American Goshawk, Accipiter gentilis atricapillus (Wilson, 1812), and a commentary about Alexander Wilson's contributions to the Peale Museum","authors":"Matthew R. Halley","doi":"10.1635/053.167.0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT. Alexander Wilson (1766–1813) based his description of the “Slate-colored Hawk / Falco atricapillus” (=Accipiter gentilis atricapillus) on a single specimen collected near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which he deposited for posterity in the Philadelphia (Peale) Museum. Wilson's illustration of the specimen was engraved and hand-colored prints were published in American Ornithology vol. 6 (1812b, Pl. 52) to accompany his scientific description of the species. However, the path of Wilson's type specimens became difficult to trace after the Peale Museum closed in 1846 and its collections were sold and dispersed. Wilson's holotype of F. atricapillus was presumed lost or destroyed until November 2020, when I rediscovered it in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (ANSP), thanks to a penciled note made by the late Rodolphe Meyer de Schauensee, former ANSP curator of birds. This research also sheds new light on the history of the Peale Museum bird collection, exposing a basic misunderstanding about the “Peale numbers” cited by Wilson, which has broad implications for the history of American ornithology. In short, “Peale numbers” were assigned to species (not specimens) held in the Peale Museum.","PeriodicalId":54579,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia","volume":"167 1","pages":"233 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1635/053.167.0114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Alexander Wilson (1766–1813) based his description of the “Slate-colored Hawk / Falco atricapillus” (=Accipiter gentilis atricapillus) on a single specimen collected near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which he deposited for posterity in the Philadelphia (Peale) Museum. Wilson's illustration of the specimen was engraved and hand-colored prints were published in American Ornithology vol. 6 (1812b, Pl. 52) to accompany his scientific description of the species. However, the path of Wilson's type specimens became difficult to trace after the Peale Museum closed in 1846 and its collections were sold and dispersed. Wilson's holotype of F. atricapillus was presumed lost or destroyed until November 2020, when I rediscovered it in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (ANSP), thanks to a penciled note made by the late Rodolphe Meyer de Schauensee, former ANSP curator of birds. This research also sheds new light on the history of the Peale Museum bird collection, exposing a basic misunderstanding about the “Peale numbers” cited by Wilson, which has broad implications for the history of American ornithology. In short, “Peale numbers” were assigned to species (not specimens) held in the Peale Museum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新发现美国苍鹰的原型,Accipiter gentilis atricapillus(威尔逊,1812),并评论亚历山大·威尔逊对皮尔博物馆的贡献
摘要。亚历山大·威尔逊(1766-1813)根据他在宾夕法尼亚州费城附近收集的一个标本描述了“板岩色鹰/Falco atricapillo”(=Accipiter gentilis atricapillu),并将其存放在费城(皮尔)博物馆供后人收藏。威尔逊对该标本的插图被雕刻,并在《美国鸟类学》第6卷(1812b,第52页)上发表了手绘版画,以配合他对该物种的科学描述。然而,在1846年皮尔博物馆关闭,其藏品被出售和分散后,威尔逊模式标本的路径变得难以追踪。直到2020年11月,我在德雷塞尔大学自然科学院(ANSP)的藏品中重新发现了威尔逊的a.atricapillus正模标本,这要归功于已故ANSP鸟类馆长鲁道夫·迈耶·德·沙恩西(Rodolphe Meyer de Schauensee)的铅笔笔记。这项研究也为皮尔博物馆鸟类收藏的历史提供了新的线索,暴露了对威尔逊引用的“皮尔数字”的基本误解,这对美国鸟类学史有着广泛的意义。简而言之,“豌豆数量”被分配给了保存在豌豆博物馆的物种(而不是标本)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia
Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 生物多样性保护-生物多样性保护
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The Proceedings (ISSN 0097-3157) has been published continuously since 1841. Many volumes are still available in their original printings. Early volumes are unbound, constituting two or three issues per year. Quantities of some volumes may be limited. Early volumes may have slightly soiled cover sheets, but the text blocks are perfect.
期刊最新文献
Catalogue of type specimens of lice (Insecta: Psocodea: Phthiraptera) held in the Field Museum of Natural History louse collection Evolutionary theoretician Edward D. Cope: a Quaker perspective Ernst Schäfer (1910–1992) – A Remembrance Why was John James Audubon denied membership at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia in 1824? Annotated checklist of the primarily freshwater fishes of Guyana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1