Recommendations to develop a laparoscopic surgical simulation training program. Insights gained after 12 years of training surgeons

Q4 Nursing Medunab Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.29375/01237047.4514
Valentina Duran-Espinoza, Isabella Montero-Jaras, Mariana Miguieles-Schilling, B. Valencia-Coronel, Francisca Belmar-Riveros, Maria Inés Gaete-Dañobeitia, Cristian Jarry-Trujillo, Julián Varas-Cohen
{"title":"Recommendations to develop a laparoscopic surgical simulation training program. Insights gained after 12 years of training surgeons","authors":"Valentina Duran-Espinoza, Isabella Montero-Jaras, Mariana Miguieles-Schilling, B. Valencia-Coronel, Francisca Belmar-Riveros, Maria Inés Gaete-Dañobeitia, Cristian Jarry-Trujillo, Julián Varas-Cohen","doi":"10.29375/01237047.4514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The use of simulation in surgery has made it possible to shorten learning curves through deliberate practice. Although it has been incorporated long ago, there are still no clear recommendations to standardize its development and implementation. This manuscript aims to share recommendations based on our experience of more than twelve years of employing and improving a methodology in laparoscopic surgical simulation. Topics for Reflection. To transfer surgical skills to a trainee, we base our methodology on a three-pillar framework: The hardware and infrastructure (tools to train with), the training program itself (what to do), and the feedback (how to improve). Implementing a cost-effective program is feasible: the hardware does not need to be high fidelity to transfer skills, but the program needs to be validated. These pillars have evolved over time by incorporating technology: the on-site guidance from experts has changed to a remote and asynchronous modality by video recording the trainee’s execution, and by enabling remote and asynchronous feedback. The feedback provider does not necessarily have to be an expert clinician in the subject, but a person previously trained to be a trainer. This allows for deliberate practice until mastery has been reached and learning curves are consolidated. Conclusions. Recommendations based on the experience of our center have been presented, explaining the framework of our strategy. Considering these suggestions, it is hoped that our simulation methodology can aid the development and implementation of effective simulation-based programs for other groups and institutions.","PeriodicalId":32336,"journal":{"name":"Medunab","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medunab","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29375/01237047.4514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The use of simulation in surgery has made it possible to shorten learning curves through deliberate practice. Although it has been incorporated long ago, there are still no clear recommendations to standardize its development and implementation. This manuscript aims to share recommendations based on our experience of more than twelve years of employing and improving a methodology in laparoscopic surgical simulation. Topics for Reflection. To transfer surgical skills to a trainee, we base our methodology on a three-pillar framework: The hardware and infrastructure (tools to train with), the training program itself (what to do), and the feedback (how to improve). Implementing a cost-effective program is feasible: the hardware does not need to be high fidelity to transfer skills, but the program needs to be validated. These pillars have evolved over time by incorporating technology: the on-site guidance from experts has changed to a remote and asynchronous modality by video recording the trainee’s execution, and by enabling remote and asynchronous feedback. The feedback provider does not necessarily have to be an expert clinician in the subject, but a person previously trained to be a trainer. This allows for deliberate practice until mastery has been reached and learning curves are consolidated. Conclusions. Recommendations based on the experience of our center have been presented, explaining the framework of our strategy. Considering these suggestions, it is hoped that our simulation methodology can aid the development and implementation of effective simulation-based programs for other groups and institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建议制定腹腔镜手术模拟培训计划。经过12年外科医生培训后获得的见解
介绍。在外科手术中使用模拟技术使得通过刻意练习缩短学习曲线成为可能。虽然它很早以前就被纳入了,但是仍然没有明确的建议来标准化它的开发和实现。这份手稿的目的是根据我们超过12年的经验分享建议,采用和改进腹腔镜手术模拟的方法。反思主题。为了将外科手术技能传授给受训者,我们的方法基于三个支柱框架:硬件和基础设施(培训工具)、培训计划本身(做什么)和反馈(如何改进)。实现一个经济有效的计划是可行的:硬件不需要高保真度来转移技能,但计划需要被验证。随着时间的推移,这些支柱随着技术的发展而发展:专家的现场指导已经通过视频记录受训者的执行情况,并通过启用远程和异步反馈,转变为远程和异步模式。反馈提供者不一定是该学科的专家临床医生,但必须是受过培训的培训师。这允许有意识的练习,直到达到精通和学习曲线得到巩固。结论。根据我们中心的经验提出了建议,解释了我们战略的框架。考虑到这些建议,希望我们的模拟方法可以帮助其他团体和机构开发和实施有效的基于模拟的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medunab
Medunab Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Caso clínico de enfermería: modelo de adaptación en adolescente con síndrome de Felty y Rhupus Atención de enfermería en preescolar con atresia pulmonar en oxigenación con membrana extracorpórea: caso exitoso Participation of Latin authors in TOP dermatology journals during 2021: a brief bibliometric analysis Caracterización de las fracturas supracondíleas del húmero en niños que requirieron manejo quirúrgico en un hospital de Santander, Colombia Representaciones gráficas de la salud: una mirada desde los niños y niñas en desplazamiento en Medellín
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1