Engendering Slave Religion: Methodology Beyond the Invisible Institution

IF 0.8 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.1093/jaarel/lfac049
Alexis S. Wells-Oghoghomeh
{"title":"Engendering Slave Religion: Methodology Beyond the Invisible Institution","authors":"Alexis S. Wells-Oghoghomeh","doi":"10.1093/jaarel/lfac049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article argues for a deprioritization of religious tradition in favor of practice-centered approaches to the study of religion among enslaved people in the United States as a means of rendering the African Atlantic and gendered dimensions more legible. In the wake of W.E.B. Du Bois’s famous argument for “the preacher, the music, and the frenzy” as the constitutive elements of African American religiosity in slavery, the historiography of slave religion has largely revolved around institutional manifestations of religion and the figures who powered them. To this end, religious traditions rooted in institutional models—with centralized authority figures, defined rites, and performative parameters—often serve as indices of religion among the enslaved. Surveying the historiography of slave religion, this article explores how the methodological prioritization of religious traditions has left the religious histories of women and others who resided outside of androcentric, heteronormative institutional frameworks largely hidden in the metanarrative of US religion and slavery. Methodologies aimed at the study of practices apart from institutions, however, prove generative for the recovery of woman-gendered and African Atlantic religious histories in the US South.","PeriodicalId":51659,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfac049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues for a deprioritization of religious tradition in favor of practice-centered approaches to the study of religion among enslaved people in the United States as a means of rendering the African Atlantic and gendered dimensions more legible. In the wake of W.E.B. Du Bois’s famous argument for “the preacher, the music, and the frenzy” as the constitutive elements of African American religiosity in slavery, the historiography of slave religion has largely revolved around institutional manifestations of religion and the figures who powered them. To this end, religious traditions rooted in institutional models—with centralized authority figures, defined rites, and performative parameters—often serve as indices of religion among the enslaved. Surveying the historiography of slave religion, this article explores how the methodological prioritization of religious traditions has left the religious histories of women and others who resided outside of androcentric, heteronormative institutional frameworks largely hidden in the metanarrative of US religion and slavery. Methodologies aimed at the study of practices apart from institutions, however, prove generative for the recovery of woman-gendered and African Atlantic religious histories in the US South.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产生奴隶宗教:超越无形制度的方法论
这篇文章认为,在研究美国奴隶的宗教问题时,应优先考虑宗教传统,而采用以实践为中心的方法,以使非洲大西洋和性别维度更加清晰。W.E.B.杜波依斯(W.E.B. Du Bois)将“传教士、音乐和狂热”作为非裔美国人奴隶制宗教信仰的构成要素的著名论点之后,奴隶宗教的史学在很大程度上围绕着宗教的制度性表现和推动宗教的人物展开。为此,植根于制度模式的宗教传统——具有集中的权威人物、明确的仪式和表演参数——常常成为被奴役者的宗教指标。本文考察了奴隶宗教的史学,探讨了宗教传统的方法论优先顺序如何将女性和其他居住在男性中心主义之外的人的宗教史和异性恋制度框架隐藏在美国宗教和奴隶制的元叙事中。然而,旨在研究除制度之外的实践的方法,证明了美国南部女性性别和非洲大西洋宗教历史的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Religion is generally considered to be the leading academic journal in the field of religious studies. Now in volume 77 and with a circulation of over 11,000, this international quarterly journal publishes leading scholarly articles that cover the full range of world religious traditions together with provocative studies of the methodologies by which these traditions are explored. Each issue also contains a large and valuable book review section.
期刊最新文献
Illiberal Jewish-Christian Encounters: Political Temporalities in Amish Country Tourism Decolonizing “the Data” of Religious Studies: A Case against the Worldview Model of Difference “The Promises of Scripture Were All for the Black People”: Sojourner Truth on the Blood of Abel and the Lamb Grave Matters: Ambiguity, Modernism, and the Quest for Moderate Islam in Indonesia Christian Addiction: The Metaphor of Debt-Bondage in Roman Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1