Worker rights and the neoliberal state under Covid-19

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2021.2010592
Carin Runciman
{"title":"Worker rights and the neoliberal state under Covid-19","authors":"Carin Runciman","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2021.2010592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article traces how the South African state responded to protect workers in the formal sector during the first year of the Covid Covid-19 pandemic. It argues that the protections that the state sought to offer, in the form of the income relief from the Covid-19 Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme and its limited attempts to ensure occupational health and safety are grounded in neoliberal logics. These logics, however, are not new and were cemented into post-apartheid labour law through the Labour Relations Act and the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, which enabled ‘regulated flexibility’. The ‘techniques of neoliberalism’ have also played an important role in shaping the institutions responsible for protecting and enforcing worker rights, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and the Department of Employment and Labour. The article details how neoliberal logics have shaped the operation of these institutions and, in turn, conditioned the state’s pandemic responses with long-term consequences for deepening inequality, access to justice and worker rights.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"255 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2021.2010592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article traces how the South African state responded to protect workers in the formal sector during the first year of the Covid Covid-19 pandemic. It argues that the protections that the state sought to offer, in the form of the income relief from the Covid-19 Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme and its limited attempts to ensure occupational health and safety are grounded in neoliberal logics. These logics, however, are not new and were cemented into post-apartheid labour law through the Labour Relations Act and the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, which enabled ‘regulated flexibility’. The ‘techniques of neoliberalism’ have also played an important role in shaping the institutions responsible for protecting and enforcing worker rights, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and the Department of Employment and Labour. The article details how neoliberal logics have shaped the operation of these institutions and, in turn, conditioned the state’s pandemic responses with long-term consequences for deepening inequality, access to justice and worker rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎下的工人权利与新自由主义国家
摘要本文追溯了在新冠肺炎新冠肺炎大流行的第一年,南非政府如何应对保护正规部门工人的问题。它认为,该州试图以新冠肺炎临时雇主/雇员救济计划的收入救济形式提供的保护,以及其确保职业健康和安全的有限努力,都是基于新自由主义逻辑的。然而,这些逻辑并不新鲜,通过《劳动关系法》和《就业基本条件法》,这些逻辑已被纳入后种族隔离时期的劳动法,从而实现了“监管灵活性”。“新自由主义技术”也在塑造负责保护和执行工人权利的机构、调解、调解和仲裁委员会以及就业和劳工部方面发挥了重要作用。这篇文章详细介绍了新自由主义逻辑如何塑造了这些机构的运作,并反过来制约了该州的疫情应对措施,从而对加深不平等、诉诸司法和工人权利产生长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1