Facing Uncertainty: Interpretation of Ambiguous Emotional Faces in Childhood Social Anxiety Disorder

IF 4.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology Pub Date : 2022-05-26 DOI:10.1080/15374416.2022.2070850
L. Mobach, M. Rinck, E. Becker, Talia Carl, A. Klein, R. Rapee, J. Hudson
{"title":"Facing Uncertainty: Interpretation of Ambiguous Emotional Faces in Childhood Social Anxiety Disorder","authors":"L. Mobach, M. Rinck, E. Becker, Talia Carl, A. Klein, R. Rapee, J. Hudson","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2022.2070850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective The current study examined whether children with a social anxiety disorder (SAD) demonstrate divergent facial emotion processing and a disorder-specific negative interpretation bias in the processing of facial emotional expressions. This study aimed to overcome previous study limitations by including both a nonsocially anxious control group and a healthy control group to examine whether childhood SAD is characterized by a general emotion labeling deficit, and/or by a negative interpretation bias, indicated by systematic misclassifications, or a lower threshold for recognizing threatening emotions. Method Participants were 132 children aged 7–12 years (M age = 9.15; 45.5% female). Children with SAD (n = 42) were compared to children with other, nonsocial, anxiety disorders (n = 40) and healthy control children (n = 50) on a novel facial emotion recognition task. Children judged ambiguous happy/neutral, angry/neutral and fear/neutral faces that were morphed at different intensities (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%). Results Children with SAD did not differ from other groups in their accuracy of identifying emotions. They did not show systematic misclassifications or a heightened sensitivity to negative, threatening faces either. Rather, children with nonsocial anxiety disorders showed a generally heightened sensitivity to emotional faces. Conclusions The current study does not provide evidence for a general deficit in labeling of emotional faces in childhood SAD. Childhood SAD was not characterized by an interpretation bias in processing emotional faces. Children with nonsocial anxiety disorders may benefit from assistance in accurately interpreting the degree of emotionality in interpersonal situations.","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":"51 1","pages":"955 - 969"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2022.2070850","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective The current study examined whether children with a social anxiety disorder (SAD) demonstrate divergent facial emotion processing and a disorder-specific negative interpretation bias in the processing of facial emotional expressions. This study aimed to overcome previous study limitations by including both a nonsocially anxious control group and a healthy control group to examine whether childhood SAD is characterized by a general emotion labeling deficit, and/or by a negative interpretation bias, indicated by systematic misclassifications, or a lower threshold for recognizing threatening emotions. Method Participants were 132 children aged 7–12 years (M age = 9.15; 45.5% female). Children with SAD (n = 42) were compared to children with other, nonsocial, anxiety disorders (n = 40) and healthy control children (n = 50) on a novel facial emotion recognition task. Children judged ambiguous happy/neutral, angry/neutral and fear/neutral faces that were morphed at different intensities (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%). Results Children with SAD did not differ from other groups in their accuracy of identifying emotions. They did not show systematic misclassifications or a heightened sensitivity to negative, threatening faces either. Rather, children with nonsocial anxiety disorders showed a generally heightened sensitivity to emotional faces. Conclusions The current study does not provide evidence for a general deficit in labeling of emotional faces in childhood SAD. Childhood SAD was not characterized by an interpretation bias in processing emotional faces. Children with nonsocial anxiety disorders may benefit from assistance in accurately interpreting the degree of emotionality in interpersonal situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对不确定性:儿童社交焦虑障碍对模糊情绪面孔的解释
摘要目的本研究考察了社交焦虑症(SAD)儿童在面部情绪表达过程中是否表现出不同的面部情绪处理和特定于SAD的负面解释偏差。本研究旨在通过纳入非社会焦虑对照组和健康对照组来克服先前研究的局限性,以检查儿童SAD是否以一般情绪标签缺陷和/或负面解释偏见为特征,以系统性错误分类为标志,或识别威胁情绪的阈值较低。方法参与者为132名7-12岁的儿童(男性9.15岁,女性45.5%)。在一项新的面部情绪识别任务中,将患有SAD的儿童(n=42)与患有其他非社交性焦虑障碍的儿童(n=40)和健康对照儿童(n=50)进行比较。孩子们判断模糊的快乐/中性、愤怒/中性和恐惧/中性面孔,这些面孔在不同强度下变形(10%、30%、50%、70%)。结果SAD儿童在识别情绪的准确性上与其他组无差异。他们也没有表现出系统性的错误分类,也没有对负面的、威胁性的面孔表现出更高的敏感性。相反,患有非社交性焦虑症的儿童对情绪面孔的敏感性普遍增强。结论目前的研究并没有为儿童SAD中情绪面孔标记的普遍缺陷提供证据。儿童SAD在处理情绪面孔时没有表现出解释偏见的特征。患有非社交焦虑症的儿童可能会受益于准确解释人际关系中情绪化程度的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Patient Gender on Clinicians' Diagnostic Assessment of Youth Disruptive Mood and Behavior. Parenting Challenges Among Families Experiencing Homelessness with Children with and without Externalizing Behavior Problems. Racial Discrimination and Trauma Symptoms Among Black Adolescent-Caregiver Dyads. Negative Urgency and Lack of Perseverance Predict Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Among Young Adolescents. Dialectical Behavior Therapy Programming for Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Implementation Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1