Living Freely Behind Bars: Reframing the Due Process Rights of Transgender Prisoners

Sarah Ortlip-Sommers
{"title":"Living Freely Behind Bars: Reframing the Due Process Rights of Transgender Prisoners","authors":"Sarah Ortlip-Sommers","doi":"10.52214/CJGL.V40I3.8599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federal constitutional jurisprudence, as it stands today, provides insufficient protections for transgender individuals who are incarcerated. Transgender prisoners face high rates of physical and sexual assault, harassment, and other mistreatment by state and federal prison officials and individuals incarcerated with them. Commonly pursued avenues for relief—namely the Eighth Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the right to privacy—present hurdles in the form of too-hard-to-meet legal standards, and they perpetuate harmful stereotypes and cultural norms that should occupy no place in modern constitutional law. This Note proposes that, instead of relying on these inadequate constitutional claims to vindicate their rights, transgender prisoners and their advocates should consider litigating under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, articulating a right to live freely in accordance with one’s gender identity. Recognition of such a right would enable plaintiffs to utilize more favorable substantive due process legal standards and eschew perpetuating outdated notions of gender within the law.","PeriodicalId":84468,"journal":{"name":"Columbia journal of gender and law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia journal of gender and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/CJGL.V40I3.8599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Federal constitutional jurisprudence, as it stands today, provides insufficient protections for transgender individuals who are incarcerated. Transgender prisoners face high rates of physical and sexual assault, harassment, and other mistreatment by state and federal prison officials and individuals incarcerated with them. Commonly pursued avenues for relief—namely the Eighth Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the right to privacy—present hurdles in the form of too-hard-to-meet legal standards, and they perpetuate harmful stereotypes and cultural norms that should occupy no place in modern constitutional law. This Note proposes that, instead of relying on these inadequate constitutional claims to vindicate their rights, transgender prisoners and their advocates should consider litigating under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, articulating a right to live freely in accordance with one’s gender identity. Recognition of such a right would enable plaintiffs to utilize more favorable substantive due process legal standards and eschew perpetuating outdated notions of gender within the law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在监狱里自由生活:重塑变性囚犯的正当程序权利
目前的联邦宪法判例对被监禁的跨性别者没有提供足够的保护。跨性别囚犯面临着来自州和联邦监狱官员以及与他们关押的个人的身体和性侵犯、骚扰和其他虐待的高发生率。通常寻求救济的途径——即第八修正案、第十四修正案的平等保护条款和隐私权——以难以达到法律标准的形式存在障碍,它们使有害的刻板印象和文化规范永久化,而这些刻板印象和文化规范不应在现代宪法中占有一席之地。本文建议,变性囚犯及其支持者不应依靠这些不充分的宪法主张来维护他们的权利,而应考虑根据第五和第十四修正案的正当程序条款提起诉讼,该条款阐明了根据自己的性别认同自由生活的权利。承认这种权利将使原告能够利用更有利的实质性正当程序法律标准,并避免在法律范围内延续过时的性别观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Day 2 Panel 3: Self-Care as Self-Preservation: Understanding Vicarious Trauma & Enhancing Support for Providers Justice For Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Conference Report Day 2 Panel 2: Promoting Equity From the Bench: Judicial Selection, Oversight, and Training Day 1 Lunchtime Speaker: Stephanie McGraw CEO W.A.R.M - We All Really Matter Day 1 Panel 2: How Bias Manifests in New York State's Family Law System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1