Deprojectification of agile: The new orthodoxy of long-term product teams

IF 0.7 Q4 MANAGEMENT Irish Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.2478/ijm-2023-0010
Torstein Nesheim
{"title":"Deprojectification of agile: The new orthodoxy of long-term product teams","authors":"Torstein Nesheim","doi":"10.2478/ijm-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Agile management thinking has influenced organisations in several ways, but the focus of this paper is on the deprojectification of agile software development. The new agile orthodoxy has been promoted by popular books, in blogs and by Spotify and other firms: agile teams should be aligned to products or domains (not projects); cover development, maintenance and operations (to reduce handover problems); and have a long-term character (to build trust, identity and domain knowledge). We first describe and contextualise the new agile orthodoxy and then, based on an empirical study of two different “agile cases,” we describe and analyse how employees and middle managers perceived the rationale behind the change to long-term teams, how they understood teams as the basic unit of the structure, their perceptions of the resource and disciplinary dimensions of the organisation and the decline of projects and project managers.","PeriodicalId":52018,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijm-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Agile management thinking has influenced organisations in several ways, but the focus of this paper is on the deprojectification of agile software development. The new agile orthodoxy has been promoted by popular books, in blogs and by Spotify and other firms: agile teams should be aligned to products or domains (not projects); cover development, maintenance and operations (to reduce handover problems); and have a long-term character (to build trust, identity and domain knowledge). We first describe and contextualise the new agile orthodoxy and then, based on an empirical study of two different “agile cases,” we describe and analyse how employees and middle managers perceived the rationale behind the change to long-term teams, how they understood teams as the basic unit of the structure, their perceptions of the resource and disciplinary dimensions of the organisation and the decline of projects and project managers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
敏捷的去项目化:长期产品团队的新正统
摘要敏捷管理思想在多个方面影响了组织,但本文的重点是敏捷软件开发的去项目化。流行书籍、博客、Spotify和其他公司都提倡新的敏捷正统观念:敏捷团队应该与产品或领域(而不是项目)保持一致;涵盖开发、维护和运营(以减少移交问题);并具有长期特征(建立信任、身份和领域知识)。我们首先描述并语境化了新的敏捷正统观念,然后,基于对两个不同“敏捷案例”的实证研究,我们描述并分析了员工和中层管理者如何看待长期团队变革背后的理由,他们如何将团队理解为结构的基本单元,他们对组织的资源和纪律层面的看法,以及项目和项目经理的衰落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Give Peace a Chance? How Regulatory Foci Influence Organizational Conflict Events in Intractable Conflict Environments. Mental health disclosure in the workplace – An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the employee experience Oh the Anxiety! The Anxiety of Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality and Mitigating Effects of Ethical Leadership Geographic Distance and State's Grip: Information Asymmetry, State Inattention, and Firm Implementation of State Policy From Home to Corner Office: How Work–Life Programs Influence Women's Managerial Representation in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1