Clinical and laboratory differences between extended-spectrum β-lactamase-positive and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-negative bacteria in febrile urinary tract infection in pediatrics

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Renal Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2021-08-26 DOI:10.34172/jrip.2022.02
M. Kahbazi, P. Yousefichaijan, D. Habibi, Somaie Nejabat, A. Najmi, F. Karimi
{"title":"Clinical and laboratory differences between extended-spectrum β-lactamase-positive and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-negative bacteria in febrile urinary tract infection in pediatrics","authors":"M. Kahbazi, P. Yousefichaijan, D. Habibi, Somaie Nejabat, A. Najmi, F. Karimi","doi":"10.34172/jrip.2022.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction: The prevalence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria is rising, which needs more potent antibiotics, such as carbapenems. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and laboratory differences between ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative bacteria in febrile UTI in children between one month to seven years to indicate prognostic parameters for ESBL+ UTI and to suggest appropriate antibiotic treatment. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study investigated 282 patients diagnosed with the first febrile UTI. The participants were assigned to ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative UTI groups. The groups were compared based on their clinical and laboratory characteristics and outcomes; the infant group was assessed separately (with the onset age of <3 months). Results: The ESBL UTI was detected in 10.2% of the cases with a history of more frequent hospitalization (P=0.002), longer hospitalization (P=0.04), higher recurrence rate (P=0.003), and more red blood cell count in urine analysis findings (P=0.02). In the antimicrobial susceptibility assay, the ESBL-positive UTI group indicated resistance to third-generation cephalosporins; nevertheless, 93.1% of the cases responded clinically. The infant group showed 13% of the patients with ESBL-positive UTI that was correlated with a history of longer preonset hospital stay (P=0.001), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (P=0.002), and elevated recurrence rate (P=0.03), compared to the older group. Conclusion: The ESBL UTI should be further considered due to the resulted recurrence rate. The antimicrobial sensitivity assay indicated resistance to third-generation cephalosporins; however, these drugs are applied as the first choice due to the high response rate. Aminoglycosides are applicable as second choice drugs prior to initiating the use of carbapenems, if third-generation cephalosporins did not indicate bactericidal impacts on ESBL UTI.","PeriodicalId":16950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrip.2022.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria is rising, which needs more potent antibiotics, such as carbapenems. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and laboratory differences between ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative bacteria in febrile UTI in children between one month to seven years to indicate prognostic parameters for ESBL+ UTI and to suggest appropriate antibiotic treatment. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study investigated 282 patients diagnosed with the first febrile UTI. The participants were assigned to ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative UTI groups. The groups were compared based on their clinical and laboratory characteristics and outcomes; the infant group was assessed separately (with the onset age of <3 months). Results: The ESBL UTI was detected in 10.2% of the cases with a history of more frequent hospitalization (P=0.002), longer hospitalization (P=0.04), higher recurrence rate (P=0.003), and more red blood cell count in urine analysis findings (P=0.02). In the antimicrobial susceptibility assay, the ESBL-positive UTI group indicated resistance to third-generation cephalosporins; nevertheless, 93.1% of the cases responded clinically. The infant group showed 13% of the patients with ESBL-positive UTI that was correlated with a history of longer preonset hospital stay (P=0.001), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (P=0.002), and elevated recurrence rate (P=0.03), compared to the older group. Conclusion: The ESBL UTI should be further considered due to the resulted recurrence rate. The antimicrobial sensitivity assay indicated resistance to third-generation cephalosporins; however, these drugs are applied as the first choice due to the high response rate. Aminoglycosides are applicable as second choice drugs prior to initiating the use of carbapenems, if third-generation cephalosporins did not indicate bactericidal impacts on ESBL UTI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科发热性尿路感染超广谱β-内酰胺酶阳性菌和超广谱β内酰胺酶阴性菌的临床和实验室差异
引言:由产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的细菌引起的尿路感染(UTIs)的患病率正在上升,需要更强效的抗生素,如碳青霉烯类抗生素。目的:评估1个月至7岁儿童发热性尿路感染ESBL阳性菌和ESBL阴性菌的临床和实验室差异,以指示ESBL+UTI的预后参数,并建议适当的抗生素治疗。患者和方法:这项横断面研究调查了282名诊断为首次发热性尿路感染的患者。参与者被分为ESBL阳性和ESBL阴性UTI组。根据临床和实验室特征和结果对各组进行比较;婴儿组分别进行评估(起病年龄<3个月)。结果:有住院次数较多(P=0.002)、住院时间较长(P=0.04)、复发率较高(P=0.003)、尿液红细胞计数较多(P=0.02)病史的患者中,有10.2%检出ESBL UTI;然而,93.1%的病例有临床反应。与老年组相比,婴儿组有13%的ESBL阳性尿路感染患者与术前住院时间较长(P=0.001)、C反应蛋白(CRP)浓度升高(P=0.002)和复发率升高(P=0.03)相关。结论:ESBL UTI复发率高,应进一步考虑。抗菌敏感性测定显示对第三代头孢菌素有耐药性;然而,这些药物由于其高应答率而被作为首选药物应用。如果第三代头孢菌素对ESBL UTI没有杀菌作用,氨基糖苷类药物在开始使用碳青霉烯类药物之前可作为第二选择药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Renal Injury Prevention
Journal of Renal Injury Prevention UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Injury Prevention (JRIP) is a quarterly peer-reviewed international journal devoted to the promotion of early diagnosis and prevention of renal diseases. It publishes in March, June, September and December of each year. It has pursued this aim through publishing editorials, original research articles, reviews, mini-reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, hypothesis, case reports, epidemiology and prevention, news and views and renal biopsy teaching point. In this journal, particular emphasis is given to research, both experimental and clinical, aimed at protection/prevention of renal failure and modalities in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. A further aim of this journal is to emphasize and strengthen the link between renal pathologists/nephropathologists and nephrologists. In addition, JRIP welcomes basic biomedical as well as pharmaceutical scientific research applied to clinical nephrology. Futuristic conceptual hypothesis that integrate various fields of acute kidney injury and renal tubular cell protection are encouraged to be submitted.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between the level of uric acid and peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients; a retrospective cohort study Contrast-associated acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast media computed tomography; new concept and future directions: A systematic review study on emergencies patients Comparing the effectiveness of hyperimmune plasma and plasmapheresis in COVID-19 patients Cancer-associated thrombotic microangiopathy; a review article The correlation between serum fibroblast growth factor-23 levels and left ventricular hypertrophy in chronic kidney disease patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1