Revisiting Susan Moller Okin’s Justice, Gender, and the Family (1989): Intersectionality, Social Ethos, and Critical Praxis of Gender Justice

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.25138/15.2/a6
John Raymond Jison
{"title":"Revisiting Susan Moller Okin’s Justice, Gender, and the Family (1989): Intersectionality, Social Ethos, and Critical Praxis of Gender Justice","authors":"John Raymond Jison","doi":"10.25138/15.2/a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In her influential work Justice, Gender, and the Family (1989), the late feminist and political philosopher Susan Moller Okin writes that “a just future would be one without gender.” She argues that the society’s veering away from gender renders the family a practical avenue where a sense of egalitarian-humanist justice can be developed. This article revisits her work and appraises the viability of her thesis in the context of women’s diverse experiences in underserved societies. By employing the concept of intersectionality, the article reflects on how Okin’s argument could be rethought to account for the substantively layered and distinct experiences of women in marginalized communities, and how achieving gender justice should go beyond dismantling gender roles within the family. This can be done by fostering an ethos of gender justice that guides members of the society into thinking about the intersections, complexities, and dynamic processes of individual experiences, and adopting a critical gender praxis to apply meaningful ideas for the creation of viable and holistic strategies in fully addressing gender inequalities.","PeriodicalId":41978,"journal":{"name":"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25138/15.2/a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: In her influential work Justice, Gender, and the Family (1989), the late feminist and political philosopher Susan Moller Okin writes that “a just future would be one without gender.” She argues that the society’s veering away from gender renders the family a practical avenue where a sense of egalitarian-humanist justice can be developed. This article revisits her work and appraises the viability of her thesis in the context of women’s diverse experiences in underserved societies. By employing the concept of intersectionality, the article reflects on how Okin’s argument could be rethought to account for the substantively layered and distinct experiences of women in marginalized communities, and how achieving gender justice should go beyond dismantling gender roles within the family. This can be done by fostering an ethos of gender justice that guides members of the society into thinking about the intersections, complexities, and dynamic processes of individual experiences, and adopting a critical gender praxis to apply meaningful ideas for the creation of viable and holistic strategies in fully addressing gender inequalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重访苏珊·莫勒·奥金的《正义、性别与家庭》(1989):性别正义的交叉性、社会风气与批判实践
:已故女权主义者和政治哲学家苏珊·莫勒·奥金(Susan Moller Okin)在其颇具影响力的著作《正义、性别与家庭》(Justice,Gender,and the Family,1989)中写道,“一个没有性别的公正未来。”。本文回顾了她的工作,并在妇女在服务不足的社会中的不同经历的背景下评估了她的论文的可行性。通过使用交叉性的概念,文章反思了如何重新思考奥金的论点,以解释边缘化社区中妇女的实质性分层和独特经历,以及实现性别正义应该如何超越消除家庭中的性别角色。要做到这一点,可以培养一种性别正义的精神,引导社会成员思考个人经历的交叉点、复杂性和动态过程,并采用关键的性别实践,应用有意义的想法,制定切实可行的整体战略,全面解决性别不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Birds of the Air, Lilies of the Field: Revisiting Animality in Heidegger through Derrida and Kierkegaard Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger The Zhuangist Primitivist Attitude Towards Technology: Further Questions for Thinking about Technological Orientation Fides et Ratio and the Evolution of the Thomistic Philosophic Tradition The Fountain Outside Heidegger's Hut, Black Forest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1