The role of metacognitive beliefs versus meta-emotion beliefs in disordered eating

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Australian Psychologist Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI:10.1080/00050067.2023.2181685
E. Strodl, P. Sorensen
{"title":"The role of metacognitive beliefs versus meta-emotion beliefs in disordered eating","authors":"E. Strodl, P. Sorensen","doi":"10.1080/00050067.2023.2181685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Emerging research has revealed that metacognitive beliefs (i.e., beliefs about cognition) and meta-emotion beliefs (i.e., beliefs about emotions) may play a role in disordered eating behaviour. This study aims to compare the strength of the associations between metacognitive beliefs and meta-emotion beliefs with disordered eating behaviours in a non-clinical sample. Method An Australian community sample (N = 411) completed an online questionnaire measuring disordered eating behaviours (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-18), metacognitive beliefs (Metacognitions Questionnaire-30) and meta-emotion beliefs (Beliefs About Emotions Questionnaire). The independent associations between metacognitive and meta-emotion beliefs with disordered eating were tested using hierarchical multiple regression. Results Only Cognitive Self-consciousness was weakly independently associated with Cognitive Restraint. The belief that emotions are overwhelming and uncontrollable was moderately independently associated with Uncontrolled Eating and Emotional Eating. Metacognitive beliefs about cognitions were not independently associated with the three disordered eating behaviours measured in this study. Conclusions Meta-emotion beliefs, or beliefs about emotions, have stronger unique associations with uncontrolled and emotional eating than metacognitive beliefs. Future longitudinal and intervention studies should focus on measuring beliefs about emotions to further understand their role in disordered eating behaviours. KEY POINTS What is already known on this topic: (1) There is emerging evidence to suggest that metacognitive beliefs are associated with disordered eating behaviour. (2) Qualitative evidence has shown support for the role of meta-emotions, or beliefs about emotions, in eating disorders. What this paper adds: (1) Neither metacognitive beliefs nor meta-emotion beliefs are strongly associated with cognitive restraint eating behaviour. (2) Metacognitive beliefs appear to not be independently associated with uncontrolled eating or emotional eating. Rather, these eating behaviours appear to be strongly associated with negative beliefs that emotions are overwhelming and uncontrollable. (3) The link between meta-emotion beliefs and emotional eating and uncontrolled eating may help explain their reactive eating behaviour in response to emotions.","PeriodicalId":47679,"journal":{"name":"Australian Psychologist","volume":"58 1","pages":"179 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2023.2181685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Emerging research has revealed that metacognitive beliefs (i.e., beliefs about cognition) and meta-emotion beliefs (i.e., beliefs about emotions) may play a role in disordered eating behaviour. This study aims to compare the strength of the associations between metacognitive beliefs and meta-emotion beliefs with disordered eating behaviours in a non-clinical sample. Method An Australian community sample (N = 411) completed an online questionnaire measuring disordered eating behaviours (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-18), metacognitive beliefs (Metacognitions Questionnaire-30) and meta-emotion beliefs (Beliefs About Emotions Questionnaire). The independent associations between metacognitive and meta-emotion beliefs with disordered eating were tested using hierarchical multiple regression. Results Only Cognitive Self-consciousness was weakly independently associated with Cognitive Restraint. The belief that emotions are overwhelming and uncontrollable was moderately independently associated with Uncontrolled Eating and Emotional Eating. Metacognitive beliefs about cognitions were not independently associated with the three disordered eating behaviours measured in this study. Conclusions Meta-emotion beliefs, or beliefs about emotions, have stronger unique associations with uncontrolled and emotional eating than metacognitive beliefs. Future longitudinal and intervention studies should focus on measuring beliefs about emotions to further understand their role in disordered eating behaviours. KEY POINTS What is already known on this topic: (1) There is emerging evidence to suggest that metacognitive beliefs are associated with disordered eating behaviour. (2) Qualitative evidence has shown support for the role of meta-emotions, or beliefs about emotions, in eating disorders. What this paper adds: (1) Neither metacognitive beliefs nor meta-emotion beliefs are strongly associated with cognitive restraint eating behaviour. (2) Metacognitive beliefs appear to not be independently associated with uncontrolled eating or emotional eating. Rather, these eating behaviours appear to be strongly associated with negative beliefs that emotions are overwhelming and uncontrollable. (3) The link between meta-emotion beliefs and emotional eating and uncontrolled eating may help explain their reactive eating behaviour in response to emotions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元认知信念与元情绪信念在饮食紊乱中的作用
摘要目的新兴研究表明,元认知信念(即认知信念)和元情绪信念(即情绪信念)可能在饮食行为紊乱中发挥作用。本研究旨在比较非临床样本中元认知信念和元情绪信念与无序饮食行为之间的关联强度。方法澳大利亚社区样本(N = 411)完成了一份在线问卷,测量无序饮食行为(三因素饮食问卷-18)、元认知信念(元认知问卷-30)和元情绪信念(情绪信念问卷)。元认知和元情绪信念与饮食紊乱之间的独立相关性采用分层多元回归进行测试。结果只有认知自我意识与认知抑制存在微弱的独立相关性。认为情绪是压倒性的和不可控制的,与不受控制的饮食和情绪性饮食适度独立相关。关于认知的元认知信念与本研究中测量的三种无序饮食行为无关。结论与元认知信念相比,元情绪信念或关于情绪的信念与不受控制和情绪化饮食有更强的独特联系。未来的纵向和干预研究应侧重于测量关于情绪的信念,以进一步了解它们在饮食紊乱行为中的作用。关键点关于这个话题已经知道的:(1)有新的证据表明,元认知信念与无序的饮食行为有关。(2) 定性证据表明,元情绪或对情绪的信念在饮食失调中的作用得到了支持。本文补充道:(1)元认知信念和元情感信念均与认知约束进食行为无关。(2) 元认知信念似乎与不受控制的饮食或情绪性饮食无关。相反,这些饮食行为似乎与负面信念密切相关,即情绪是压倒性的和无法控制的。(3) 元情绪信念与情绪性饮食和不受控制的饮食之间的联系可能有助于解释他们对情绪的反应性饮食行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Psychologist
Australian Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Australian Psychologist is the official applied practice and public policy journal of the Australian Psychological Society. As such, the journal solicits articles covering current issues in psychology, the science and practice of psychology, and psychology"s contribution to public policy, with particular emphasis on the Australian context. Periodically, Australian Psychological Society documents, including but not limited to, position papers, reports of the Society, ethics information, surveys of the membership, announcements, and selected award addresses may appear in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Co-sleeping fathers’ perceptions of sleep quality with intentional and unintentional co-sleeping Psychometric examination of the Japanese version of Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory Male-friendly counselling for young men: a thematic analysis of client and caregiver experiences of Menslink counselling Climate change and mental health: postgraduate psychology student and program coordinator perspectives from Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand The Westerman Aboriginal Symptom Checklist – Youth Version: national data from a clinical sample of Aboriginal youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1