Editorial

Q2 Social Sciences Evaluation Journal of Australasia Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1035719X20931250
K. Hassall, A. Gullickson, A. Boyce, Kelly M Hannum
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"K. Hassall, A. Gullickson, A. Boyce, Kelly M Hannum","doi":"10.1177/1035719X20931250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“So what harm would be done if evaluators ignored values? In one sense, no harm would be done, because evaluations would still have values implicit in them. Values inevitably permeate the selection of independent and dependent variables, the choice of questions and stakeholders, and the social and political context from which many evaluations arise. Evaluators cannot avoid values even if they try. But in another sense, real harm is done if evaluators deal with values naively or poorly through their implicit choices.” Shadish, 1994, p. 35","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"20 1","pages":"63 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1035719X20931250","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X20931250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“So what harm would be done if evaluators ignored values? In one sense, no harm would be done, because evaluations would still have values implicit in them. Values inevitably permeate the selection of independent and dependent variables, the choice of questions and stakeholders, and the social and political context from which many evaluations arise. Evaluators cannot avoid values even if they try. But in another sense, real harm is done if evaluators deal with values naively or poorly through their implicit choices.” Shadish, 1994, p. 35
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑
“那么,如果评估者忽略了价值观,又会造成什么伤害呢?”从某种意义上说,不会造成任何伤害,因为评估仍然隐含着价值。价值观不可避免地渗透到自变量和因变量的选择、问题和利益相关者的选择以及产生许多评价的社会和政治背景中。评估者即使尝试也无法避免价值。但从另一种意义上说,如果评估者通过他们的隐性选择天真或糟糕地处理价值观,就会造成真正的伤害。”沙迪什,1994年,第35页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Utilising existing data for a pilot social return on investment analysis of the family wellbeing empowerment program: A justification and framework Evaluation at the cutting edge: Driving innovation and quality The best medicine: Lessons from health for policy randomistas Evaluator perspective: Meet an Australian Evaluation Society Fellow – Nan Wehipeihana Meta-evaluation: Validating program evaluation standards through the United Nations Evaluation Quality Assessment (EQAs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1