Analysis: Classifying Ventilation Modes and Improving Operator Training with ISO 19223:2019.

Debra R. Milamed, N. S. Jones
{"title":"Analysis: Classifying Ventilation Modes and Improving Operator Training with ISO 19223:2019.","authors":"Debra R. Milamed, N. S. Jones","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that more than 300,000 patients are ventilated in the United States each year. Human factors and communication issues have been cited as the two most common causes of ventilator-related sentinel events, according to reports of patient mortality or severe harm received by The Joint Commission during 2004–15. Over a decade ago, it was determined that the scope of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard IEC 60601-1:2005 had to be extended to consider equipment usability in its third edition. The Joint Working Group (JWG) of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and IEC subcommittees responsible for critical care ventilators (ISO/TC 121/SC 3 and IEC TC/SC 62D/JWG 1) concurred that there was a wide recognition that a key factor adversely affecting lung ventilator usability was the lack of a standardized vocabulary relating to the modes of operation for these devices. At that time, ISO 4135:2001 was the only international standard that included terms related to devices of that type; however, its scope was restricted to defining terms that were used in standards related to the performance of such equipment and therefore did not cover usage factors. The terms in general clinical use had origins in the early days of mechanical ventilation, when the emphasis was on saving the lives of patients who were unable to breathe on their own, with little attention given to patients' respiratory activity.","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":"53 6 1","pages":"420-424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that more than 300,000 patients are ventilated in the United States each year. Human factors and communication issues have been cited as the two most common causes of ventilator-related sentinel events, according to reports of patient mortality or severe harm received by The Joint Commission during 2004–15. Over a decade ago, it was determined that the scope of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard IEC 60601-1:2005 had to be extended to consider equipment usability in its third edition. The Joint Working Group (JWG) of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and IEC subcommittees responsible for critical care ventilators (ISO/TC 121/SC 3 and IEC TC/SC 62D/JWG 1) concurred that there was a wide recognition that a key factor adversely affecting lung ventilator usability was the lack of a standardized vocabulary relating to the modes of operation for these devices. At that time, ISO 4135:2001 was the only international standard that included terms related to devices of that type; however, its scope was restricted to defining terms that were used in standards related to the performance of such equipment and therefore did not cover usage factors. The terms in general clinical use had origins in the early days of mechanical ventilation, when the emphasis was on saving the lives of patients who were unable to breathe on their own, with little attention given to patients' respiratory activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析:根据ISO 19223:2019对通风模式进行分类并改进操作员培训。
美国疾病控制与预防中心(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)报告称,美国每年有超过30万名患者接受呼吸机治疗。根据2004 - 2015年联合委员会收到的患者死亡或严重伤害报告,人为因素和沟通问题被认为是导致呼吸机相关哨点事件的两个最常见原因。十多年前,国际电工委员会(IEC)标准IEC 60601-1:2005的范围必须扩展,以考虑其第三版的设备可用性。国际标准化组织(ISO)联合工作组(JWG)和IEC负责重症呼吸机的小组委员会(ISO/TC 121/SC 3和IEC TC/SC 62D/JWG 1)一致认为,人们普遍认为,影响肺呼吸机可用性的一个关键因素是缺乏与这些设备的操作模式相关的标准化词汇。当时,ISO 4135:2001是唯一包含与该类型设备相关术语的国际标准;但是,它的范围仅限于定义与这种设备的性能有关的标准中使用的术语,因此不包括使用因素。一般临床使用的术语起源于机械通气的早期,当时的重点是挽救无法自主呼吸的患者的生命,很少关注患者的呼吸活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gamma and X-ray Irradiation on Polymers Commonly Used in Healthcare Products. Effect of Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitrogen Dioxide Sterilization on Nitinol. Toward Enhanced Machine-Based Release in X-ray Sterilization. Beyond Endoscopes: Pilot Study of Surgical Instrument Lumen Inspection. Advantages and Limitations of Physical and Virtual Dose Mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1