Causality Assessment of Adverse Drug Reaction Using Naranjo Probability Scale: A Retrospective Study

S. R. Bajracharya, R. Ghimire, P. Gyanwali, A. Khadka
{"title":"Causality Assessment of Adverse Drug Reaction Using Naranjo Probability Scale: A Retrospective Study","authors":"S. R. Bajracharya, R. Ghimire, P. Gyanwali, A. Khadka","doi":"10.3126/mjsbh.v19i1.21573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nIntroduction: Globally, Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) has been listed as the sixth leading causes of death. Recognition of ADR and establishment of relationship of drug with the symptom is the first step to the management of the problem. In this study, Naranjo algorithm has been used which is one of the most accepted tools for the assessment of causality of ADR with the suspected drug. \nMethods: A retrospective descriptive study was done which included 35 reported cases of ADRs in Drug Information Unit (DIU) in tertiary care teaching institute of Nepal from Dec 2015 to Oct 2016. Based on the information in the reported ADRs forms, categorisation was done using Naranjo’s ADR Probability scale. The data was analysed using SPSS version 16.0 and descriptive statistics was used. \nResults: It was seen that ADRs were more common in male (n=20) as compared to female (n=15). Amongst male, ADRs were more common in age group 50-75 years (n=8). ADRs were most commonly seen with antimicrobial agents (40%) followed by Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) (20%) and immunosuppressants (20%). Within the antimicrobial agents, anti-tubercular drugs (20%) contributed the most in ADRs and hepatotoxicity was the most common ADR seen. Majority of ADRs were categorised under possible (n=29) followed by probable (n=6). \nConclusions: Naranjo algorithm could be a useful tool for causality assessment of ADR which can help physicians to guide the therapy. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":33963,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i1.21573","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i1.21573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) has been listed as the sixth leading causes of death. Recognition of ADR and establishment of relationship of drug with the symptom is the first step to the management of the problem. In this study, Naranjo algorithm has been used which is one of the most accepted tools for the assessment of causality of ADR with the suspected drug. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was done which included 35 reported cases of ADRs in Drug Information Unit (DIU) in tertiary care teaching institute of Nepal from Dec 2015 to Oct 2016. Based on the information in the reported ADRs forms, categorisation was done using Naranjo’s ADR Probability scale. The data was analysed using SPSS version 16.0 and descriptive statistics was used. Results: It was seen that ADRs were more common in male (n=20) as compared to female (n=15). Amongst male, ADRs were more common in age group 50-75 years (n=8). ADRs were most commonly seen with antimicrobial agents (40%) followed by Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) (20%) and immunosuppressants (20%). Within the antimicrobial agents, anti-tubercular drugs (20%) contributed the most in ADRs and hepatotoxicity was the most common ADR seen. Majority of ADRs were categorised under possible (n=29) followed by probable (n=6). Conclusions: Naranjo algorithm could be a useful tool for causality assessment of ADR which can help physicians to guide the therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用Naranjo概率量表评价药物不良反应因果关系的回顾性研究
引言:在全球范围内,药物不良反应(ADR)已被列为第六大死亡原因。识别ADR并建立药物与症状的关系是解决问题的第一步。在这项研究中,使用了Naranjo算法,这是评估ADR与可疑药物因果关系的最常用工具之一。方法:进行回顾性描述性研究,纳入2015年12月至2016年10月尼泊尔高等教育教学机构药物信息室(DIU)报告的35例ADR病例。根据报告的ADR表格中的信息,使用Naranjo的ADR概率量表进行分类。数据使用SPSS 16.0版进行分析,并使用描述性统计。结果:与女性(n=15)相比,男性(n=20)的ADR更常见。在男性中,ADR在50-75岁年龄组更常见(n=8)。ADR最常见于抗菌药物(40%),其次是非甾体抗炎药(20%)和免疫抑制剂(20%)。在抗菌药物中,抗结核药物(20%)对不良反应的贡献最大,肝毒性是最常见的不良反应。大多数ADR分为可能(n=29)和可能(n=6)。结论:Naranjo算法可作为ADR因果关系评估的有用工具,有助于医生指导治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective study to Analyze the Outcomes of Paediatric Pyeloplasty in Poorly Functioning Kidneys Visual Function at High Altitude in Nepal A Case of Hydropyometra Secondary to Vaginal Atresia: A Case Report Endovascular Management of a Rare Case of a True Facial Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report Spectrum of Neurological cases in OPD of Tertiary Paediatric care Center of Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1