A comparative study of efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% versus olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% in allergic conjunctivitis at a tertiary care hospital

Akilandeswari Krishnan, C. Jayanthi, Sriya Sridhar
{"title":"A comparative study of efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% versus olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% in allergic conjunctivitis at a tertiary care hospital","authors":"Akilandeswari Krishnan, C. Jayanthi, Sriya Sridhar","doi":"10.4103/kjo.kjo_185_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ocular itching is the hallmark symptom of allergic conjunctivitis, accompanied by tearing, conjunctival redness, eyelid swelling, and chemosis. Alcaftadine and olopatadine hydrochloride are classified as dual-acting antiallergic agents, used in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Objective: The aim is to compare the efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% eye drops among patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Settings and Design: Ophthalmology outpatient department at Minto Ophthalmic Hospital, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru; prospective, randomized, comparative study. Subjects and Methods: This study was conducted among 120 patients suffering from grade 3 Allergic conjunctivitis and efficacy measured in terms of proportion of patients achieving symptomatic relief of allergic ocular signs and symptoms from grade 3 to grade 0 from baseline to 2 weeks, using Total Ocular Symptoms Score (TOSS) and Conjunctival Hyperemia scale. Safety assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse effects. Continuous data assessed by unpaired, paired t-test and repeated measures-ANOVA and categorical data by Chi-square test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas < 0.001 as highly significant. Results: Greater proportion of patients achieved symptomatic relief in the Alcaftadine group (98.3%) compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (90%) at end of 2 weeks. A significant and faster reduction in TOSS score was observed from baseline to 2 weeks in alcaftadine treated group compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (P < 0.05). Adverse events reported were headache, burning sensation, and mild redness in both groups. Conclusion: Alcaftadine 0.25% demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing ocular signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis from baseline to 2 weeks, compared to olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% with minimal side-effects.","PeriodicalId":32483,"journal":{"name":"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"34 1","pages":"227 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kjo.kjo_185_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ocular itching is the hallmark symptom of allergic conjunctivitis, accompanied by tearing, conjunctival redness, eyelid swelling, and chemosis. Alcaftadine and olopatadine hydrochloride are classified as dual-acting antiallergic agents, used in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Objective: The aim is to compare the efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% eye drops among patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Settings and Design: Ophthalmology outpatient department at Minto Ophthalmic Hospital, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru; prospective, randomized, comparative study. Subjects and Methods: This study was conducted among 120 patients suffering from grade 3 Allergic conjunctivitis and efficacy measured in terms of proportion of patients achieving symptomatic relief of allergic ocular signs and symptoms from grade 3 to grade 0 from baseline to 2 weeks, using Total Ocular Symptoms Score (TOSS) and Conjunctival Hyperemia scale. Safety assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse effects. Continuous data assessed by unpaired, paired t-test and repeated measures-ANOVA and categorical data by Chi-square test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas < 0.001 as highly significant. Results: Greater proportion of patients achieved symptomatic relief in the Alcaftadine group (98.3%) compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (90%) at end of 2 weeks. A significant and faster reduction in TOSS score was observed from baseline to 2 weeks in alcaftadine treated group compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (P < 0.05). Adverse events reported were headache, burning sensation, and mild redness in both groups. Conclusion: Alcaftadine 0.25% demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing ocular signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis from baseline to 2 weeks, compared to olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% with minimal side-effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
0.25%阿尔卡他定与0.2%盐酸奥洛帕坦治疗三级医院过敏性结膜炎的疗效和安全性比较研究
背景:眼部瘙痒是过敏性结膜炎的标志性症状,伴有撕裂、结膜发红、眼睑肿胀和化学性水肿。Alcaftadine和olopatadine盐酸盐被归类为双作用抗过敏剂,用于治疗过敏性结膜炎。目的:比较0.25%阿尔卡他定和0.2%盐酸奥洛帕定滴眼液治疗过敏性结膜炎的疗效和安全性。设置和设计:班加罗尔医学院和研究所明托眼科医院眼科门诊部;前瞻性、随机、比较研究。受试者和方法:本研究在120名3级过敏性结膜炎患者中进行,并使用总眼部症状评分(TOSS)和结膜充血量表,根据基线至2周3级至0级过敏性眼部体征和症状症状缓解的患者比例来衡量疗效。通过监测治疗突发的不良反应来评估安全性。通过非配对、配对t检验和重复测量ANOVA评估的连续数据和通过卡方检验评估的分类数据。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义,而<0.001被认为具有高度意义。结果:与盐酸奥洛帕坦组(90%)相比,Alcaftadine组在2周结束时症状缓解的患者比例更大(98.3%)。与盐酸奥洛帕定组相比,从基线到2周,观察到阿尔卡他定治疗组的TOSS评分显著且更快地降低(P<0.05)。两组报告的不良事件均为头痛、烧灼感和轻度发红。结论:从基线到2周,0.25%的Alcaftadine在减少过敏性结膜炎的眼部体征和症状方面表现出更大的疗效,而0.2%的盐酸奥洛帕定具有最小的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Aicardi syndrome Review of “A randomized trial evaluating efficacy of overminus lenses combined with prism in the children with intermittent exotropia” Bilateral proptosis in Marshall-Smith syndrome Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment outcome of Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: A 2-year experience at a tertiary care center A study to assess meibomian gland morphology using meibography in posterior blepharitis patients and normal population: A hospital-based observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1