Policy transition: public sector sport for development in Northern Ireland

IF 2.1 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics Pub Date : 2023-03-05 DOI:10.1080/19406940.2023.2183976
Kyle Ferguson, D. Hassan, P. Kitchin
{"title":"Policy transition: public sector sport for development in Northern Ireland","authors":"Kyle Ferguson, D. Hassan, P. Kitchin","doi":"10.1080/19406940.2023.2183976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Globally, governments are implementing public sector reform to address declining budgets and public trust to improve programme efficiency and effectiveness. Sport has become ever more relevant with regards local, national and international social policy as part of an enhanced role for the third sector in tackling a plethora of societal issues. This article attempts to explore, the success (or otherwise) of sport for development (SfD) programmes transitioning positive outcomes from a micro and meso level to the macro level in Northern Ireland. Three management models (Outcomes-based accountability, Organisational capacity and Resource dependency theory) are used to establish the level of efficiency and effectiveness of SfD programmes in Northern Ireland, based on semi-structured interviews with a range of policy and delivery stakeholders. This article identifies potential areas of conflict at the intersection between policy and practice which limit the translation of successful project outcomes. The ambiguity of purpose combined with the absence of a population level evaluation model and financial reliance perpetuates task-based projects at the expense of sectoral outcomes. In turn, individuals are faced with a ridged multi-agency offering without a multi-agency approach. This article recommends a government-wide indicator for sport and physical activity linked to an overarching sport-related strategy, which clearly defines language, purpose and responsibilities across the public sector. One which builds on existing structures to support transition (individual and organisational) across the three identified interlinking phases of sport.","PeriodicalId":47174,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","volume":"15 1","pages":"211 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2183976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Globally, governments are implementing public sector reform to address declining budgets and public trust to improve programme efficiency and effectiveness. Sport has become ever more relevant with regards local, national and international social policy as part of an enhanced role for the third sector in tackling a plethora of societal issues. This article attempts to explore, the success (or otherwise) of sport for development (SfD) programmes transitioning positive outcomes from a micro and meso level to the macro level in Northern Ireland. Three management models (Outcomes-based accountability, Organisational capacity and Resource dependency theory) are used to establish the level of efficiency and effectiveness of SfD programmes in Northern Ireland, based on semi-structured interviews with a range of policy and delivery stakeholders. This article identifies potential areas of conflict at the intersection between policy and practice which limit the translation of successful project outcomes. The ambiguity of purpose combined with the absence of a population level evaluation model and financial reliance perpetuates task-based projects at the expense of sectoral outcomes. In turn, individuals are faced with a ridged multi-agency offering without a multi-agency approach. This article recommends a government-wide indicator for sport and physical activity linked to an overarching sport-related strategy, which clearly defines language, purpose and responsibilities across the public sector. One which builds on existing structures to support transition (individual and organisational) across the three identified interlinking phases of sport.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策过渡:北爱尔兰公共部门体育促进发展
在全球范围内,各国政府正在实施公共部门改革,以解决预算下降和公众信任问题,提高规划效率和效果。体育在地方、国家和国际社会政策方面变得越来越重要,是第三部门在解决大量社会问题方面发挥更大作用的一部分。本文试图探讨体育促进发展(SfD)计划在北爱尔兰从微观和中观层面向宏观层面转变积极成果的成功(或其他)。三种管理模式(基于结果的问责制,组织能力和资源依赖理论)用于建立北爱尔兰SfD计划的效率和有效性水平,基于对一系列政策和交付利益相关者的半结构化访谈。本文确定了政策和实践之间的潜在冲突领域,这些领域限制了成功项目成果的翻译。目的含糊不清,加上缺乏人口水平的评价模式和财政依赖,使以任务为基础的项目以牺牲部门成果为代价而永久化。反过来,个人面临的是一个没有多机构方法的脊状多机构提供。本文建议制定一个政府范围内的体育和身体活动指标,并将其与总体体育相关战略联系起来,明确界定公共部门的语言、目的和责任。一个是建立在现有结构的基础上,以支持跨越三个确定的体育相互联系阶段的过渡(个人和组织)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the power of sports: an exploration of the nexus between shared place, community competence, and sense of community Constraints and facilitators of elite athletes’ dual careers: a systematic literature review The arsenal of democracy? An examination of political regime types’ success in the global sporting arms race following the collapse of the iron curtain ‘Fog on the tyne’? The ‘common-sense’ focus on ‘sportswashing’ and the 2021 takeover of Newcastle United Power in mixed martial arts (MMA): a case study of the ultimate fighting championship (UFC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1