Comparison of the Antimicrobial Effect of Chlorine Dioxide, Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine, on Bacteria Isolated from the Root Canal

Paulina Yaret Alvarado Rodríguez
{"title":"Comparison of the Antimicrobial Effect of Chlorine Dioxide, Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine, on Bacteria Isolated from the Root Canal","authors":"Paulina Yaret Alvarado Rodríguez","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(4)-141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare the antimicrobial capacity of Chlorine Dioxide (ClO2), Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) and Chlorhexidine (CHX) in microorganisms isolated from persistent apical periodontitis and ATCC strains.\n\nMaterials and methods: The microorganisms included were analyzed by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC): 50 µl of saline solution and 100 µl of Chlorine Dioxide 0.25%, Sodium Hypochlorite 1% and Chlorhexidine 2% were used to make the following dilutions of 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, 1:1024 and test them with the following microorganisms, E. faecalis from root canal and S. viridans, anginosus group from the alveolus, in adittion, Escherichia coli ATCC and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC were included to observe bacterial growth after 18h of incubation.\n\nResults: NaOCl inhibited the microorganisms in all the dilutions, the ClO2 showed bacterial growth in dilution 1:128, CHX1:8, in E. faecalis, S. viridans, anginosus group, ClO2:1:32, CHX:1:8, Escherichia coli ATCC ClO2:1:32, CHX:1:128, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC ClO2:1:64 and CHX:1:256.\n\nConclusion: NaOCl was the chemical agent that inhibited all the strains evaluated, followed by ClO2 and Chlorhexidine 2% needed higher concentrations for the eradication of the analyzed strains.","PeriodicalId":92922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(4)-141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the antimicrobial capacity of Chlorine Dioxide (ClO2), Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) and Chlorhexidine (CHX) in microorganisms isolated from persistent apical periodontitis and ATCC strains. Materials and methods: The microorganisms included were analyzed by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC): 50 µl of saline solution and 100 µl of Chlorine Dioxide 0.25%, Sodium Hypochlorite 1% and Chlorhexidine 2% were used to make the following dilutions of 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, 1:1024 and test them with the following microorganisms, E. faecalis from root canal and S. viridans, anginosus group from the alveolus, in adittion, Escherichia coli ATCC and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC were included to observe bacterial growth after 18h of incubation. Results: NaOCl inhibited the microorganisms in all the dilutions, the ClO2 showed bacterial growth in dilution 1:128, CHX1:8, in E. faecalis, S. viridans, anginosus group, ClO2:1:32, CHX:1:8, Escherichia coli ATCC ClO2:1:32, CHX:1:128, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC ClO2:1:64 and CHX:1:256. Conclusion: NaOCl was the chemical agent that inhibited all the strains evaluated, followed by ClO2 and Chlorhexidine 2% needed higher concentrations for the eradication of the analyzed strains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二氧化氯、次氯酸钠和氯己定对根管分离细菌抑菌效果的比较
目的:比较二氧化氯(ClO2)、次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和氯己定(CHX)对持续性根尖周炎和ATCC菌株微生物的抗菌能力。材料和方法:采用最小抑菌浓度(MIC)对所含微生物进行分析:用50µl生理盐水和100µl 0.25%的二氧化氯、1%的次氯酸钠和2%的氯己定配制如下稀释液:1:2、1:4、1:8、1:16、1:32、1:64、1:128、1:256、1:512、1:1024,并用以下微生物进行测试,将来自根管的粪大肠杆菌和来自肺泡的病毒性链球菌、来自声门的脉管菌群、大肠杆菌ATCC和金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC包括在内,以观察培养18小时后的细菌生长。结果:NaOCl在所有稀释液中都能抑制微生物,ClO2在稀释液1:128、CHX1:8中显示细菌生长,在粪大肠杆菌、病毒性链球菌、心绞痛组、ClO2:1:32、CHX:1:8、大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、,其次是ClO2和氯己定,2%需要更高的浓度来根除所分析的菌株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Stress Analysis To Obtain The Tensile Properties of Three Type-1 and Type-3 Collagen Membranes Clinical Dentistry and Oral Cancer Screening A Systematic Review of The Relationship Between Parental Stress and Early Childhood Caries Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy: A Rare Case Report and Review Exploring Periodontics specialty: A Vision for the Future (Opinion)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1