“We tick: Other” – race, religion, and literary solidarities in three essay anthologies and the neo-liberal marketplace

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Journal of Postcolonial Writing Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/17449855.2023.2216039
R. Ahmed
{"title":"“We tick: Other” – race, religion, and literary solidarities in three essay anthologies and the neo-liberal marketplace","authors":"R. Ahmed","doi":"10.1080/17449855.2023.2216039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article considers Nikesh Shukla’s The Good Immigrant (2016) alongside two anthologies of essays by British Muslim women: Mariam Khan’s It’s Not About the Burqa (2019) and Sabeena Akhtar’s Cut from the Same Cloth? (2021). Situating them within the publishing industry’s racializing practices, which valorize writing by authors of colour as authentically representative of their cultures while devaluing it as less “literary” than white British writing, the article asks how the foregrounding of religiosity rather than race in Akhtar’s and Khan’s anthologies works to confirm or challenge these dominant terms of reception. The article is interested in how these anthologies might trouble the boundary between “culture” as the values and practices subscribed to by a racially minoritized community, and “culture” as the self-reflexive expression of individual creativity. Ultimately, it suggests the essay anthology might point to a form of literary solidarity that reaches beyond the confines of the neo-liberal marketplace even while remaining partly constrained by them.","PeriodicalId":44946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Postcolonial Writing","volume":"59 1","pages":"315 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Postcolonial Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2023.2216039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article considers Nikesh Shukla’s The Good Immigrant (2016) alongside two anthologies of essays by British Muslim women: Mariam Khan’s It’s Not About the Burqa (2019) and Sabeena Akhtar’s Cut from the Same Cloth? (2021). Situating them within the publishing industry’s racializing practices, which valorize writing by authors of colour as authentically representative of their cultures while devaluing it as less “literary” than white British writing, the article asks how the foregrounding of religiosity rather than race in Akhtar’s and Khan’s anthologies works to confirm or challenge these dominant terms of reception. The article is interested in how these anthologies might trouble the boundary between “culture” as the values and practices subscribed to by a racially minoritized community, and “culture” as the self-reflexive expression of individual creativity. Ultimately, it suggests the essay anthology might point to a form of literary solidarity that reaches beyond the confines of the neo-liberal marketplace even while remaining partly constrained by them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们滴答:他者”——种族、宗教和文学团结在三个散文选集和新自由主义市场
摘要本文将奈基什·舒克拉(Nikesh Shukla)的《好移民》(The Good Immigrant,2016)与英国穆斯林女性的两本散文选集放在一起:玛丽亚姆·汗(Mariam Khan)的《与罩袍无关》(It’s Not About The Burqa,2019)和萨比娜·阿赫塔尔(Sabeena Akhtar)的《同一块布上的剪裁?(2021)。将其置于出版业的种族化做法中,这种做法将有色人种作家的作品视为其文化的真实代表,同时将其贬低为不如英国白人作品“文学性”,这篇文章询问了阿赫塔和可汗选集中宗教而非种族的前景如何证实或挑战这些主流的接受条件。这篇文章感兴趣的是,这些选集可能会如何打破“文化”和“文化”之间的界限,“文化”是少数种族社区认同的价值观和实践,而“文化”则是个人创造力的自我反射表达。最终,它表明,这本散文集可能指向一种超越新自由主义市场界限的文学团结形式,即使在一定程度上仍受其约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Journal of Postcolonial Writing is an academic journal devoted to the study of literary and cultural texts produced in various postcolonial locations around the world. It explores the interface between postcolonial writing, postcolonial and related critical theories, and the economic, political and cultural forces that shape contemporary global developments. In addition to criticism focused on literary fiction, drama and poetry, we publish theoretically-informed articles on a variety of genres and media, including film, performance and other cultural practices, which address issues of relevance to postcolonial studies. In particular we seek to promote diasporic voices, as well as creative and critical texts from various national or global margins.
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The question of the interview The interrogation: Interviews at the limit Intergenerational trauma and complex implication in Maaza Mengiste’s The Shadow King (2019) “Jack and Johnny went up the hill”: Emergent homonationalism and the construction of a palatable queer subject in post-Section 377 Bollywood cinema Theory as a way of life: Sissako, filmmaking, and the postcolonial interview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1