Optimal Shrinkage Estimation of Predictive Densities Under α-Divergences

IF 4.9 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Bayesian Analysis Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1214/21-BA1264
E. George, Gourab Mukherjee, Keisuke Yano
{"title":"Optimal Shrinkage Estimation of Predictive Densities Under α-Divergences","authors":"E. George, Gourab Mukherjee, Keisuke Yano","doi":"10.1214/21-BA1264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the problem of estimating the predictive density in a heteroskedastic Gaussian model under general divergence loss. Based on a conjugate hierarchical set-up, we consider generic classes of shrinkage predictive densities that are governed by location and scale hyper-parameters. For any α-divergence loss, we propose a risk-estimation based methodology for tuning these shrinkage hyper-parameters. Our proposed predictive density estimators enjoy optimal asymptotic risk properties that are in concordance with the optimal shrinkage calibration point estimation results established by Xie, Kou, and Brown (2012) for heteroskedastic hierarchical models. These α-divergence risk optimality properties of our proposed predictors are not shared by empirical Bayes predictive density estimators that are calibrated by traditional methods such as maximum likelihood and method of moments. We conduct several numerical studies to compare the non-asymptotic performance of our proposed predictive density estimators with other competing methods and obtain encouraging results. MSC2020 subject classifications: Primary 62L20; secondary 60F15, 60G42.","PeriodicalId":55398,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/21-BA1264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We consider the problem of estimating the predictive density in a heteroskedastic Gaussian model under general divergence loss. Based on a conjugate hierarchical set-up, we consider generic classes of shrinkage predictive densities that are governed by location and scale hyper-parameters. For any α-divergence loss, we propose a risk-estimation based methodology for tuning these shrinkage hyper-parameters. Our proposed predictive density estimators enjoy optimal asymptotic risk properties that are in concordance with the optimal shrinkage calibration point estimation results established by Xie, Kou, and Brown (2012) for heteroskedastic hierarchical models. These α-divergence risk optimality properties of our proposed predictors are not shared by empirical Bayes predictive density estimators that are calibrated by traditional methods such as maximum likelihood and method of moments. We conduct several numerical studies to compare the non-asymptotic performance of our proposed predictive density estimators with other competing methods and obtain encouraging results. MSC2020 subject classifications: Primary 62L20; secondary 60F15, 60G42.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
α-散度下预测密度的最优收缩估计
我们考虑了一般发散损失下异方差高斯模型中预测密度的估计问题。基于共轭层次结构,我们考虑了由位置和尺度超参数控制的收缩预测密度的一般类别。对于任何α-发散损失,我们提出了一种基于风险估计的方法来调整这些收缩超参数。我们提出的预测密度估计量具有最优渐近风险性质,与Xie、Kou和Brown(2012)为异方差层次模型建立的最优收缩校准点估计结果一致。我们提出的预测因子的这些α-散度风险最优性性质与通过传统方法(如最大似然法和矩量法)校准的经验贝叶斯预测密度估计量不相同。我们进行了几项数值研究,将我们提出的预测密度估计量的非渐近性能与其他竞争方法进行了比较,并获得了令人鼓舞的结果。MSC2020受试者分类:初级62L20;次级60F15、60G42。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bayesian Analysis
Bayesian Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
13.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bayesian Analysis is an electronic journal of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis. It seeks to publish a wide range of articles that demonstrate or discuss Bayesian methods in some theoretical or applied context. The journal welcomes submissions involving presentation of new computational and statistical methods; critical reviews and discussions of existing approaches; historical perspectives; description of important scientific or policy application areas; case studies; and methods for experimental design, data collection, data sharing, or data mining. Evaluation of submissions is based on importance of content and effectiveness of communication. Discussion papers are typically chosen by the Editor in Chief, or suggested by an Editor, among the regular submissions. In addition, the Journal encourages individual authors to submit manuscripts for consideration as discussion papers.
期刊最新文献
How Trustworthy Is Your Tree? Bayesian Phylogenetic Effective Sample Size Through the Lens of Monte Carlo Error. A General Bayesian Functional Spatial Partitioning Method for Multiple Region Discovery Applied to Prostate Cancer MRI. Posterior Shrinkage Towards Linear Subspaces Dynamic Functional Variable Selection for Multimodal mHealth Data Heavy-Tailed NGG-Mixture Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1