Whitening and racial ambiguity: racialization and ethnoracial citizenship in contemporary Brazil

Q1 Social Sciences African and Black Diaspora Pub Date : 2017-05-04 DOI:10.1080/17528631.2016.1189693
Sean T. Mitchell
{"title":"Whitening and racial ambiguity: racialization and ethnoracial citizenship in contemporary Brazil","authors":"Sean T. Mitchell","doi":"10.1080/17528631.2016.1189693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent policies to redress racial inequality in Brazil, including affirmative action and the protection of Afro-Brazilian land rights, have generated fierce debates about the character of race and racism in Brazilian society. In this article, I critically examine an assumption structuring these debates: that Brazil is characterized by a special tolerance for ethnoracial ambiguity that is threatened by these initiatives. Drawing on ethnographic research on conflicts between Afro-Brazilian communities and Brazil’s spaceport, I argue that an everyday imperative to social whitening shows how this ethnoracial ambiguity has been skewed toward one racial pole. Affirmative action policies do not eliminate ethnoracial ambiguity, but have helped to change the force of the everyday whitening that structures it. In this critique, I aim to clarify the nature of ethnoracial changes in Brazil, as the ideology of ‘racial democracy’ has lost the hegemony it held during much of Brazil’s twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":39013,"journal":{"name":"African and Black Diaspora","volume":"10 1","pages":"114 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17528631.2016.1189693","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African and Black Diaspora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17528631.2016.1189693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent policies to redress racial inequality in Brazil, including affirmative action and the protection of Afro-Brazilian land rights, have generated fierce debates about the character of race and racism in Brazilian society. In this article, I critically examine an assumption structuring these debates: that Brazil is characterized by a special tolerance for ethnoracial ambiguity that is threatened by these initiatives. Drawing on ethnographic research on conflicts between Afro-Brazilian communities and Brazil’s spaceport, I argue that an everyday imperative to social whitening shows how this ethnoracial ambiguity has been skewed toward one racial pole. Affirmative action policies do not eliminate ethnoracial ambiguity, but have helped to change the force of the everyday whitening that structures it. In this critique, I aim to clarify the nature of ethnoracial changes in Brazil, as the ideology of ‘racial democracy’ has lost the hegemony it held during much of Brazil’s twentieth century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白人化与种族模糊:当代巴西的种族化与民族-种族公民身份
摘要巴西最近为纠正种族不平等而采取的政策,包括平权行动和保护非裔巴西人的土地权,引发了关于巴西社会中种族和种族主义特征的激烈辩论。在这篇文章中,我批判性地研究了构成这些辩论的一个假设:巴西的特点是对种族-种族模糊性有着特殊的容忍,而这些倡议正威胁着这种容忍。根据对非裔巴西社区和巴西太空港之间冲突的民族志研究,我认为,每天都必须进行社会白化,这表明这种种族-种族的模糊性是如何向一个种族极点倾斜的。平权行动政策并没有消除种族主义的模糊性,但有助于改变构成它的日常白化的力量。在这篇评论中,我的目的是澄清巴西种族主义变化的本质,因为“种族民主”的意识形态已经失去了它在巴西20世纪大部分时间所拥有的霸权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African and Black Diaspora
African and Black Diaspora Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Afro Love: counter-literacies in Brazilian natural hair communities Attitudes towards Afro-Venezuelans in lyrics of gaita zuliana: 1965–1985 Ziba Khanum of Yazd: an enslaved African woman in nineteenth-century Iran Othering and disillusionment in Laila Lalami’s The Other Americans Questioning the practice of la sape: will the London movement survive?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1