Action 7 of the BEPS action plan and the permanent establishment status of non-resident online retailers in South Africa

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE South African Journal of Accounting Research Pub Date : 2018-09-02 DOI:10.1080/10291954.2018.1537158
Stephan Spies, L. van Heerden
{"title":"Action 7 of the BEPS action plan and the permanent establishment status of non-resident online retailers in South Africa","authors":"Stephan Spies, L. van Heerden","doi":"10.1080/10291954.2018.1537158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Action 7 of the BEPS action plan identified a multinational tax planning strategy that typically avoids corporate tax in the consumer country by preventing the creation of a Permanent Establishment (PE) therein. This is especially relevant in South Africa’s online retail industry on the basis that the taxability of non-resident online retailers depends on the existence of a South African PE, as defined. In response to the use of tax planning structures that avoid the creation of a PE, Action 7 proposed certain amendments to the PE definition. This article investigated to what extent, if any, the proposed solutions in Action 7 could impact the definition of a PE and, consequently, the taxability of non-resident online retailers in South Africa. A literature review of publications on Action 7 was undertaken and applied to a South African case study to meet the stated objective. It was established that the applicability and impact of the amendments are case specific and depend, inter alia, on South Africa’s position on the OECD’s multilateral instrument. Should the amendments apply, the South African warehouse of a non-resident online retailer may, depending on the facts, create a PE and resulting tax liability for an enterprise that previously avoided corporate tax in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":43731,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"225 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10291954.2018.1537158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2018.1537158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Action 7 of the BEPS action plan identified a multinational tax planning strategy that typically avoids corporate tax in the consumer country by preventing the creation of a Permanent Establishment (PE) therein. This is especially relevant in South Africa’s online retail industry on the basis that the taxability of non-resident online retailers depends on the existence of a South African PE, as defined. In response to the use of tax planning structures that avoid the creation of a PE, Action 7 proposed certain amendments to the PE definition. This article investigated to what extent, if any, the proposed solutions in Action 7 could impact the definition of a PE and, consequently, the taxability of non-resident online retailers in South Africa. A literature review of publications on Action 7 was undertaken and applied to a South African case study to meet the stated objective. It was established that the applicability and impact of the amendments are case specific and depend, inter alia, on South Africa’s position on the OECD’s multilateral instrument. Should the amendments apply, the South African warehouse of a non-resident online retailer may, depending on the facts, create a PE and resulting tax liability for an enterprise that previously avoided corporate tax in South Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BEPS行动计划的第7项行动和南非非居民在线零售商的常设机构地位
BEPS行动计划的第7项行动确定了一种跨国税收规划策略,该策略通常通过防止在消费国设立常设机构(PE)来避免在该国纳税。这在南非的在线零售行业尤为重要,因为非居民在线零售商的可征税性取决于是否存在南非PE。针对使用避免创建PE的税务规划结构的情况,第7项行动建议对PE定义进行某些修订。本文调查了行动7中提出的解决方案在多大程度上(如果有的话)可能影响PE的定义,从而影响南非非居民在线零售商的可征税性。对关于行动7的出版物进行了文献审查,并将其应用于一项南非个案研究,以实现既定目标。经确定,修正案的适用性和影响是具体情况而定的,除其他外,取决于南非对经合发组织多边文书的立场。如果修正案适用,根据事实,非居民在线零售商的南非仓库可能会为以前在南非避免公司税的企业创建PE并由此产生纳税义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Impacts of corporate governance attributes on audit quality in emerging economies: The case of India A systematic literature review of blockchain technology and accounting issues: Is it a hype or hope? Is there a gender gap in audit fees in Spain? Explaining the variables involved in audit fees Deductibility of input tax on share issue costs in the context of the broad taxation principles Determinants of the effective tax rate: Board composition of South African firms listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1