Mutation-Induced Changes in the Stability, B-Cell Epitope, and Antigenicity of the Sars-Cov-2 Variant Spike Protein: A Comparative Computational Stud

N. M. Wijayanti, M. H. Widyananda, L. Muflikhah, N. Widodo
{"title":"Mutation-Induced Changes in the Stability, B-Cell Epitope, and Antigenicity of the Sars-Cov-2 Variant Spike Protein: A Comparative Computational Stud","authors":"N. M. Wijayanti, M. H. Widyananda, L. Muflikhah, N. Widodo","doi":"10.33640/2405-609x.3311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The spike (S) protein is a major antigenicity site that targets neutralizing antibodies and drugs. The growing number of S protein mutations has become a severe problem for developing effective vaccines. Here, we investigated four severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants that were the most infectious and widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine the trends and patterns of mutation-induced changes in the stability, B-cell epitope, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. The data showed that the Beta and Gamma variants had three mutations on the receptor-binding domain (RBD), which is the specific site on the S protein for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) binding. The Delta variant had only two mutations, whereas the Omicron variant had 15 mutations on the RBD. The results showed that the stability of the S protein varied and depended on the mutation type and that Gamma and Omicron are the most stable of the four variants analyzed. The S protein–hACE2 complexes of the Beta and Gamma variants were relatively stable after 20 ns of simulation compared with those of the Delta and Omicron variants. We predicted that the B-cell epitopes of the mutant S protein would be different from those of the wildtype. Moreover, the antigenicity of Omicron changed drastically compared with that of the other variants. Bioinformatics analysis and a molecular dynamic simulation revealed that the mutations affected the stability of the S protein. A large number of mutations do not always stabilize the S protein. Mutations in Omicron significantly altered the B-cell epitope and antigenicity, which decreased vaccine effectiveness. These findings provide insights into SARS-CoV-2 evolution for vaccine development.","PeriodicalId":17782,"journal":{"name":"Karbala International Journal of Modern Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karbala International Journal of Modern Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33640/2405-609x.3311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The spike (S) protein is a major antigenicity site that targets neutralizing antibodies and drugs. The growing number of S protein mutations has become a severe problem for developing effective vaccines. Here, we investigated four severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants that were the most infectious and widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine the trends and patterns of mutation-induced changes in the stability, B-cell epitope, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. The data showed that the Beta and Gamma variants had three mutations on the receptor-binding domain (RBD), which is the specific site on the S protein for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) binding. The Delta variant had only two mutations, whereas the Omicron variant had 15 mutations on the RBD. The results showed that the stability of the S protein varied and depended on the mutation type and that Gamma and Omicron are the most stable of the four variants analyzed. The S protein–hACE2 complexes of the Beta and Gamma variants were relatively stable after 20 ns of simulation compared with those of the Delta and Omicron variants. We predicted that the B-cell epitopes of the mutant S protein would be different from those of the wildtype. Moreover, the antigenicity of Omicron changed drastically compared with that of the other variants. Bioinformatics analysis and a molecular dynamic simulation revealed that the mutations affected the stability of the S protein. A large number of mutations do not always stabilize the S protein. Mutations in Omicron significantly altered the B-cell epitope and antigenicity, which decreased vaccine effectiveness. These findings provide insights into SARS-CoV-2 evolution for vaccine development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sars-Cov-2变异刺突蛋白稳定性、b细胞表位和抗原性的突变诱导变化:比较计算研究
刺突(S)蛋白是一种主要的抗原性位点,靶向中和抗体和药物。越来越多的S蛋白突变已经成为开发有效疫苗的一个严重问题。在这里,我们研究了在COVID-19大流行期间最具传染性和最广泛的四种SARS-CoV-2变异,以确定突变诱导的SARS-CoV-2蛋白稳定性、b细胞表位和抗原性变化的趋势和模式。数据显示Beta和Gamma变异在受体结合域(RBD)上有三个突变,RBD是S蛋白上血管紧张素转换酶2 (hACE2)结合的特异性位点。Delta变体只有两个突变,而Omicron变体在RBD上有15个突变。结果表明,S蛋白的稳定性随突变类型的不同而变化,其中Gamma和Omicron是4个变异中最稳定的。与Delta和Omicron变体相比,Beta和Gamma变体的S蛋白- hace2复合物在模拟20 ns后相对稳定。我们预测突变S蛋白的b细胞表位与野生型不同。此外,与其他变异相比,Omicron的抗原性发生了巨大变化。生物信息学分析和分子动力学模拟表明,突变影响了S蛋白的稳定性。大量的突变并不总能稳定S蛋白。Omicron突变显著改变了b细胞表位和抗原性,从而降低了疫苗的有效性。这些发现为疫苗开发提供了对SARS-CoV-2进化的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Karbala International Journal of Modern Science
Karbala International Journal of Modern Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Freedom as the Physical Notion. Mechanics of a Material Point Enhanced optoelectronics performance of hybrid self power photodetectors GO: TiO2- AD / n-Si heterojunctions The Potential Influence of Immune Modulatory Molecules (TGF-βIII and CTLA-4) in Pathogenicity of PCOS Heterogeneous Resources in Infrastructures of the Edge Network Paradigm: A Comprehensive Review Classification and removal of hazy images based on a transmission fusion strategy using the Alexnet network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1