Mild cognitive impairment in COVID-19 survivors: Measuring the brain fog

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1080/00207411.2021.1988402
A. Vyas, Vasim Raja Panwar, V. Mathur, Parth Patel, Surabhi Mathur, Arvind K Sharma, Raja Babu Panwar, Rajeev Gupta
{"title":"Mild cognitive impairment in COVID-19 survivors: Measuring the brain fog","authors":"A. Vyas, Vasim Raja Panwar, V. Mathur, Parth Patel, Surabhi Mathur, Arvind K Sharma, Raja Babu Panwar, Rajeev Gupta","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2021.1988402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been impacting individuals throughout the world. Millions have been affected, and while many have recovered, a growing number of recovered COVID-19 patients are reportedly facing neurological symptoms, described as “slow thinking,” “difficulty in focusing,” “confusion,” “lack of concentration,” “forgetfulness,” or “haziness in thought process.” These experiences of mental fatigue, associated with and related to mild cognitive impairments, may be conceptually defined as “brain fog.” Objective To study the prevalence and severity of these brain fog symptoms in COVID-19 recovered patients, and examining their association with age, gender, and COVID-19 symptom severity. Methods A total of 300 patients who tested positive for Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) for SARSCoV-2 during April–August 2020 were included in our study after complete recovery from their acute illness. They were assessed for brain fog symptoms using the 9-item validated Wood’s mental fatigue inventory. Results/Conclusions The overall cumulative prevalence of any components of brain fog was 34%, with a mean score of 6.11 ± 1.7 in those who experienced it. Males were more affected than females (42.3% vs. 29.1%) with males scoring higher than females. The mean score was higher in severe ill and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients and those who required oxygen or were on a ventilator.","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":"51 1","pages":"142 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2021.1988402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been impacting individuals throughout the world. Millions have been affected, and while many have recovered, a growing number of recovered COVID-19 patients are reportedly facing neurological symptoms, described as “slow thinking,” “difficulty in focusing,” “confusion,” “lack of concentration,” “forgetfulness,” or “haziness in thought process.” These experiences of mental fatigue, associated with and related to mild cognitive impairments, may be conceptually defined as “brain fog.” Objective To study the prevalence and severity of these brain fog symptoms in COVID-19 recovered patients, and examining their association with age, gender, and COVID-19 symptom severity. Methods A total of 300 patients who tested positive for Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) for SARSCoV-2 during April–August 2020 were included in our study after complete recovery from their acute illness. They were assessed for brain fog symptoms using the 9-item validated Wood’s mental fatigue inventory. Results/Conclusions The overall cumulative prevalence of any components of brain fog was 34%, with a mean score of 6.11 ± 1.7 in those who experienced it. Males were more affected than females (42.3% vs. 29.1%) with males scoring higher than females. The mean score was higher in severe ill and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients and those who required oxygen or were on a ventilator.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19幸存者的轻度认知障碍:测量脑雾
背景2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行正在全球范围内影响着人们。数百万人受到影响,虽然许多人已经康复,但据报道,越来越多的康复COVID-19患者面临神经系统症状,被描述为“思维缓慢”、“难以集中注意力”、“混乱”、“缺乏注意力”、“健忘”或“思维过程模糊”。这些与轻度认知障碍相关的精神疲劳经历,可以在概念上定义为“脑雾”。目的了解新冠肺炎康复患者脑雾症状的患病率和严重程度,并探讨其与年龄、性别、症状严重程度的关系。方法将2020年4月至8月期间SARSCoV-2实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测阳性的300例患者纳入我们的研究,这些患者在急性疾病完全康复后。使用9项经验证的伍德精神疲劳量表评估他们的脑雾症状。结果/结论脑雾各组成部分的总体累积患病率为34%,平均评分为6.11±1.7。男性比女性更受影响(42.3%比29.1%),且男性得分高于女性。重症和重症监护病房(ICU)患者以及需要吸氧或使用呼吸机的患者的平均得分更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The official journal of the World Association for Psychosocial Rehabilitation, the International Journal of Mental Health features in-depth articles on research, clinical practice, and the organization and delivery of mental health services around the world. Covering both developed and developing countries, it provides vital information on important new ideas and trends in community mental health, social psychiatry, psychiatric epidemiology, prevention, treatment, and psychosocial rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Migration in psychiatry trainees in the United Kingdom: results from a cross-sectional survey The prevalence and factors associated with sexting among Vietnamese adolescents: a gender-specific analysis Digitalized social and emotional learning and better wellbeing among displaced Syrian adolescents in Lebanon Medication beliefs and adherence to antipsychotic medication in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia: The moderating role of doctor–patient communication Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of frontline hospital-based nurses: rapid review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1