Financial Literacy, the “High-Fee Puzzle,” and Knowledge about the Importance of Fees

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Retirement Pub Date : 2020-12-12 DOI:10.3905/jor.2020.1.078
L. Muller, J. Turner
{"title":"Financial Literacy, the “High-Fee Puzzle,” and Knowledge about the Importance of Fees","authors":"L. Muller, J. Turner","doi":"10.3905/jor.2020.1.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the causes of the “high-fee puzzle,” which is that some people pay high-fees for financial advice and financial products when lower-fee advice and products are available. We hypothesize that lack of awareness of the size of the effect of fees on account balances is one cause. We survey college students with business-related majors, asking them questions on the effects of fees on account balances, as well as standard financial literacy questions. We find that only one-third of students are able to answer the fee questions correctly; three-quarters correctly answered the common financial literacy questions. We tested whether people understand the importance of fees when fees are presented in a simple, transparent manner. Our results suggest that policies to require simple, transparent fee disclosures may be more effective if more people understood the importance of fees. For pension participants, our results suggest the importance of investment menus excluding high-fee options and focusing on low-fee options. TOPIC: Retirement Key Findings ▪ We find widespread lack of knowledge concerning the size of the effect of fees on future account balances. ▪ This lack of knowledge may explain the “high-fee puzzle,” where people pay high-fees for financial products and advice when lower-fee alternatives are available. ▪ For pension participants, our results support the importance of investment menus excluding high-fee options and focusing on low-fee options.","PeriodicalId":36429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retirement","volume":"8 1","pages":"29 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2020.1.078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article investigates the causes of the “high-fee puzzle,” which is that some people pay high-fees for financial advice and financial products when lower-fee advice and products are available. We hypothesize that lack of awareness of the size of the effect of fees on account balances is one cause. We survey college students with business-related majors, asking them questions on the effects of fees on account balances, as well as standard financial literacy questions. We find that only one-third of students are able to answer the fee questions correctly; three-quarters correctly answered the common financial literacy questions. We tested whether people understand the importance of fees when fees are presented in a simple, transparent manner. Our results suggest that policies to require simple, transparent fee disclosures may be more effective if more people understood the importance of fees. For pension participants, our results suggest the importance of investment menus excluding high-fee options and focusing on low-fee options. TOPIC: Retirement Key Findings ▪ We find widespread lack of knowledge concerning the size of the effect of fees on future account balances. ▪ This lack of knowledge may explain the “high-fee puzzle,” where people pay high-fees for financial products and advice when lower-fee alternatives are available. ▪ For pension participants, our results support the importance of investment menus excluding high-fee options and focusing on low-fee options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融知识,“高费用难题”,以及关于费用重要性的知识
本文调查了“高收费难题”的原因,即有些人在可以获得低收费的理财建议和理财产品时,却支付了高费用。我们假设缺乏对费用对账户余额影响大小的认识是一个原因。我们调查了商业相关专业的大学生,询问他们费用对账户余额的影响,以及标准的金融知识问题。我们发现只有三分之一的学生能够正确回答费用问题;四分之三的受访者正确回答了常见的金融知识问题。当费用以简单、透明的方式呈现时,我们测试了人们是否理解费用的重要性。我们的研究结果表明,如果更多的人了解费用的重要性,要求简单、透明的费用披露的政策可能会更有效。对于养老金参与者来说,我们的研究结果表明,投资菜单排除高费用选项,专注于低费用选项的重要性。我们发现普遍缺乏关于费用对未来账户余额影响大小的知识。▪这种知识的缺乏可能解释了“高费用难题”,即人们为金融产品和建议支付高费用,而可以获得低费用的替代方案。▪对于养老金参与者,我们的研究结果支持投资菜单排除高费用选项并专注于低费用选项的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Retirement
Journal of Retirement Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Investment Restrictions on Pension Participants: A Case Study of Nigeria Editor’s Letter The Role of Annuities in Managing Sequence of Returns Risk Approaching and in Retirement guest commentary Valuation of Financial Decision-Making Retirement Planning, Retirement Insecurity, and Financial Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1