Novel scene understanding, from gist to elaboration

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL VISUAL COGNITION Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1080/13506285.2023.2221047
T. Sanocki, T. Nguyen, S. Shultz, J. Defant
{"title":"Novel scene understanding, from gist to elaboration","authors":"T. Sanocki, T. Nguyen, S. Shultz, J. Defant","doi":"10.1080/13506285.2023.2221047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We examined the cognitive experience of novel pictorial scenes, using observers’ words. On each of two critical trials, a single novel scene (a photo) was presented briefly, after which observers described what they saw. The reports were highly valid, assessed against details of the stimuli. The most frequent concepts used by the observers defined scene gist empirically – there was wide agreement on the basic scene interpretation. The average extent of the reports, or cognitive bandwidth, was fairly high overall: a median of 14.4 correct meaningful words per scene. However, there was a wide range of report lengths across observers. With length, the reports became increasingly elaborative and unique (and still correct). The longer reports document the richer and more unique side of a gist-to-elaboration continuum. In addition, a manipulation of immediately prior experience (priming with other scenes) caused an increase in the reporting of prime-related information, conveyed by a wide range of concepts, including relational concepts. The results are consistent with cognitive theories of perception and the claim of substantial cognitive bandwidth. Furthermore, the highly elaborative reports document a measured diversity of powerful scene understanding.","PeriodicalId":47961,"journal":{"name":"VISUAL COGNITION","volume":"31 1","pages":"188 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VISUAL COGNITION","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2023.2221047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examined the cognitive experience of novel pictorial scenes, using observers’ words. On each of two critical trials, a single novel scene (a photo) was presented briefly, after which observers described what they saw. The reports were highly valid, assessed against details of the stimuli. The most frequent concepts used by the observers defined scene gist empirically – there was wide agreement on the basic scene interpretation. The average extent of the reports, or cognitive bandwidth, was fairly high overall: a median of 14.4 correct meaningful words per scene. However, there was a wide range of report lengths across observers. With length, the reports became increasingly elaborative and unique (and still correct). The longer reports document the richer and more unique side of a gist-to-elaboration continuum. In addition, a manipulation of immediately prior experience (priming with other scenes) caused an increase in the reporting of prime-related information, conveyed by a wide range of concepts, including relational concepts. The results are consistent with cognitive theories of perception and the claim of substantial cognitive bandwidth. Furthermore, the highly elaborative reports document a measured diversity of powerful scene understanding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小说场景的理解,从主旨到阐述
摘要:我们用观察者的话考察了小说画面的认知体验。在两次关键性试验中,每一次都会简要呈现一个新颖的场景(一张照片),然后观察者描述他们所看到的。这些报告是高度有效的,根据刺激的细节进行评估。观测者最常用的概念是根据经验定义场景要点——在基本的场景解释上达成了广泛一致。总体而言,报告的平均范围或认知带宽相当高:每个场景平均有14.4个正确的有意义的单词。然而,观察员的报告篇幅各不相同。随着篇幅的增长,报告变得越来越详尽和独特(而且仍然正确)。报告记录的时间越长,说明要点的连续性就越丰富、越独特。此外,对直接先前经验的操纵(与其他场景的启动)导致了主要相关信息的报告增加,这些信息由包括关系概念在内的广泛概念传达。结果与感知的认知理论和实质认知带宽的主张一致。此外,高度细致的报告记录了强大场景理解的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VISUAL COGNITION
VISUAL COGNITION PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Visual Cognition publishes new empirical research that increases theoretical understanding of human visual cognition. Studies may be concerned with any aspect of visual cognition such as object, face, and scene recognition; visual attention and search; short-term and long-term visual memory; visual word recognition and reading; eye movement control and active vision; and visual imagery. The journal is devoted to research at the interface of visual perception and cognition and does not typically publish papers in areas of perception or psychophysics that are covered by the many publication outlets for those topics.
期刊最新文献
Auditory distractors are processed but do not interfere with visual search of any difficulty when sound is irrelevant Handling distractor interference in mixed and fixed search Distraction from long-term memory in visual search: Acquired procedural and template-based memory interfere with contextual cueing after target re-location Within-Subject manipulations of proactive control do not change negative templates benefits: Exploring the effect of reward on negative and positive cues No difference in prior representations of what to attend and what to ignore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1