Non-pharmacological management of pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders: Current evidence and future perspectives

Maria Luísa Cordeiro Santos, Ronaldo Teixeira da Silva Júnior, B. B. de Brito, Filipe Antônio França da Silva, Hanna Santos Marques, Vinícius Lima de Souza Gonçalves, Talita Costa dos Santos, Carolina Ladeia Cirne, N. O. E. Silva, M. V. Oliveira, F. F. de Melo
{"title":"Non-pharmacological management of pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders: Current evidence and future perspectives","authors":"Maria Luísa Cordeiro Santos, Ronaldo Teixeira da Silva Júnior, B. B. de Brito, Filipe Antônio França da Silva, Hanna Santos Marques, Vinícius Lima de Souza Gonçalves, Talita Costa dos Santos, Carolina Ladeia Cirne, N. O. E. Silva, M. V. Oliveira, F. F. de Melo","doi":"10.5409/wjcp.v11.i2.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) are an important and prevalent cause of functional gastrointestinal disorders among children, encompassing the diagnoses of functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, abdominal migraine, and the one not previously present in Rome III, functional abdominal pain not otherwise specified. In the absence of sufficiently effective and safe pharmacological treatments for this public problem, non-pharmacological therapies emerge as a viable means of treating these patients, avoiding not only possible side effects, but also unnecessary prescription, since many of the pharmacological treatments prescribed do not have good efficacy when compared to placebo. Thus, the present study provides a review of current and relevant evidence on non-pharmacological management of FAPDs, covering the most commonly indicated treatments, from cognitive behavioral therapy to meditation, acupuncture, yoga, massage, spinal manipulation, moxibustion, and physical activities. In addition, this article also analyzes the quality of publications in the area, assessing whether it is possible to state if non-pharmacological therapies are viable, safe, and sufficiently well-based for an appropriate and effective prescription of these treatments. Finally, it is possible to observe an increase not only in the number of publications on the non-pharmacological treatments for FAPDs in recent years, but also an increase in the quality of these publications. Finally, the sample selection of satisfactory age groups in these studies enables the formulation of specific guidelines for this age group, thus avoiding the need for adaptation of prescriptions initially made for adults, but for children use.","PeriodicalId":75338,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical pediatrics","volume":"11 1","pages":"105 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v11.i2.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) are an important and prevalent cause of functional gastrointestinal disorders among children, encompassing the diagnoses of functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, abdominal migraine, and the one not previously present in Rome III, functional abdominal pain not otherwise specified. In the absence of sufficiently effective and safe pharmacological treatments for this public problem, non-pharmacological therapies emerge as a viable means of treating these patients, avoiding not only possible side effects, but also unnecessary prescription, since many of the pharmacological treatments prescribed do not have good efficacy when compared to placebo. Thus, the present study provides a review of current and relevant evidence on non-pharmacological management of FAPDs, covering the most commonly indicated treatments, from cognitive behavioral therapy to meditation, acupuncture, yoga, massage, spinal manipulation, moxibustion, and physical activities. In addition, this article also analyzes the quality of publications in the area, assessing whether it is possible to state if non-pharmacological therapies are viable, safe, and sufficiently well-based for an appropriate and effective prescription of these treatments. Finally, it is possible to observe an increase not only in the number of publications on the non-pharmacological treatments for FAPDs in recent years, but also an increase in the quality of these publications. Finally, the sample selection of satisfactory age groups in these studies enables the formulation of specific guidelines for this age group, thus avoiding the need for adaptation of prescriptions initially made for adults, but for children use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童功能性腹痛疾病的非药物治疗:目前的证据和未来的观点
功能性腹痛障碍(FAPDs)是儿童功能性胃肠疾病的一个重要且普遍的病因,包括功能性消化不良、肠易激综合征、腹部偏头痛,以及先前未出现在罗马III期的功能性腹痛,功能性腹痛未另行说明。在缺乏足够有效和安全的药物治疗这一公共问题的情况下,非药物治疗成为治疗这些患者的一种可行方法,不仅避免了可能的副作用,而且避免了不必要的处方,因为许多开出的药物治疗与安慰剂相比效果并不好。因此,本研究综述了fapd非药物治疗的现有相关证据,涵盖了最常见的治疗方法,从认知行为疗法到冥想、针灸、瑜伽、按摩、脊柱推拿、艾灸和体育活动。此外,本文还分析了该领域出版物的质量,评估是否有可能说明非药物治疗是否可行、安全,以及是否有足够的基础来确定这些治疗的适当和有效的处方。最后,可以观察到,近年来,不仅关于FAPDs非药物治疗的出版物数量有所增加,而且这些出版物的质量也有所提高。最后,在这些研究中,样本选择令人满意的年龄组,可以为这个年龄组制定具体的指导方针,从而避免了需要调整最初为成人而为儿童使用的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Built environment and childhood obesity. Clinical and laboratory features of juvenile idiopathic arthritis with wrist involvement: Results of a retrospective cohort study. Decoding the genetic landscape of autism: A comprehensive review. Evaluation of thyroid profile among children aged 1-15 years with nephrotic syndrome: An observation study. Genetic predisposition to childhood cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1