Iris Marion Young’s Faces of Oppression and the Oppression of Women in the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.25138/14.1.a.5
M. A. Mancenido-Bolaños
{"title":"Iris Marion Young’s Faces of Oppression and the Oppression of Women in the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012","authors":"M. A. Mancenido-Bolaños","doi":"10.25138/14.1.a.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I wish to argue that it is necessary to have an earnest understanding of the plight of women before crafting laws that directly impact their lives. Against the backdrop of my discussion is the notion of “oppression” offered by Iris Marion Young in her book Justice and Politics of Difference. I recount Young’s description of the “faces of oppression” and use her notion of oppression to show that the process of policy-making in the Philippines is mired by the oppressive dominance of patriarchal bias. In her book, The RH Bill Story: Contentions and Compromises, Marilen J. Dañguilan provides the most comprehensive study of the role that Filipina women played during the drafting of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012. I draw on the work of Dañguilan in order to cite instances of oppression of women in policy making.","PeriodicalId":41978,"journal":{"name":"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25138/14.1.a.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, I wish to argue that it is necessary to have an earnest understanding of the plight of women before crafting laws that directly impact their lives. Against the backdrop of my discussion is the notion of “oppression” offered by Iris Marion Young in her book Justice and Politics of Difference. I recount Young’s description of the “faces of oppression” and use her notion of oppression to show that the process of policy-making in the Philippines is mired by the oppressive dominance of patriarchal bias. In her book, The RH Bill Story: Contentions and Compromises, Marilen J. Dañguilan provides the most comprehensive study of the role that Filipina women played during the drafting of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012. I draw on the work of Dañguilan in order to cite instances of oppression of women in policy making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾里斯·马里昂·杨的《压迫的面孔》和《2012年负责任的生育和生殖健康法》中对妇女的压迫
在本文中,我想指出,在制定直接影响妇女生活的法律之前,有必要认真了解妇女的困境。在我讨论的背景下,Iris Marion Young在她的著作《正义与政治的差异》中提出了“压迫”的概念。我重述了杨对“压迫面孔”的描述,并用她的压迫概念来表明,菲律宾的政策制定过程陷入了父权偏见的压迫统治。Marilen J. Dañguilan在她的书《RH Bill的故事:争论和妥协》中,对菲律宾妇女在起草1987年菲律宾宪法和2012年《负责任的生育和生殖健康法》期间所扮演的角色进行了最全面的研究。我引用Dañguilan的工作,以列举在政策制定中压迫妇女的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Birds of the Air, Lilies of the Field: Revisiting Animality in Heidegger through Derrida and Kierkegaard Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger The Zhuangist Primitivist Attitude Towards Technology: Further Questions for Thinking about Technological Orientation Fides et Ratio and the Evolution of the Thomistic Philosophic Tradition The Fountain Outside Heidegger's Hut, Black Forest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1