Union ‘facilitation effect’ and access to non-wage benefits in the Ghanaian labour market

IF 1.4 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Oxford Development Studies Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/13600818.2020.1808603
N. Owoo, M. Lambon-Quayefio, J. Dávalos, Samuel B. Manu
{"title":"Union ‘facilitation effect’ and access to non-wage benefits in the Ghanaian labour market","authors":"N. Owoo, M. Lambon-Quayefio, J. Dávalos, Samuel B. Manu","doi":"10.1080/13600818.2020.1808603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Effective access to mandatory non-wage benefits is key to workers achieving decent working conditions. This paper investigates the effects of union presence on workers’ access to non-wage benefits in the Ghanaian labor market. The study draws its data from the 2012–2013 Ghana Living Standards Survey (GLSS 6) and specifies a multivariate model that simultaneously controls for endogeneity and potential sample-selection biases. We find that unions have a significant effect on facilitation among workers by improving awareness of and access to work benefits. Other factors that affect benefit entitlements in Ghana include the gender of a worker, urbanization, firm size, sector formality, public v.s. private sector jobs, type of occupation, and the presence of work contracts amongst others. Results presented here indicate that workers from formal-sector firms with union presence are more likely to have access to non-wage benefits. It is also found that despite the statutory nature of these non-wage benefits, non-compliance was common, predominantly in the informal sector but also in the formal sector. This is particularly the case with respect to maternity leave benefits and indicates a need for greater enforcement of these laws.","PeriodicalId":51612,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Development Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"240 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600818.2020.1808603","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2020.1808603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effective access to mandatory non-wage benefits is key to workers achieving decent working conditions. This paper investigates the effects of union presence on workers’ access to non-wage benefits in the Ghanaian labor market. The study draws its data from the 2012–2013 Ghana Living Standards Survey (GLSS 6) and specifies a multivariate model that simultaneously controls for endogeneity and potential sample-selection biases. We find that unions have a significant effect on facilitation among workers by improving awareness of and access to work benefits. Other factors that affect benefit entitlements in Ghana include the gender of a worker, urbanization, firm size, sector formality, public v.s. private sector jobs, type of occupation, and the presence of work contracts amongst others. Results presented here indicate that workers from formal-sector firms with union presence are more likely to have access to non-wage benefits. It is also found that despite the statutory nature of these non-wage benefits, non-compliance was common, predominantly in the informal sector but also in the formal sector. This is particularly the case with respect to maternity leave benefits and indicates a need for greater enforcement of these laws.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工会的“便利效应”和在加纳劳动力市场获得非工资福利的机会
摘要有效获得强制性非工资福利是工人获得体面工作条件的关键。本文调查了工会存在对加纳劳动力市场工人获得非工资福利的影响。该研究的数据来自2012-2013年加纳生活水平调查(GLSS 6),并指定了一个同时控制内生性和潜在样本选择偏差的多变量模型。我们发现,工会通过提高对工作福利的认识和获得工作福利的机会,对工人的便利化产生了重大影响。影响加纳福利待遇的其他因素包括工人的性别、城市化、公司规模、部门形式、公共部门与私营部门的工作、职业类型以及工作合同的存在等。这里提供的结果表明,来自有工会存在的正规部门公司的工人更有可能获得非工资福利。研究还发现,尽管这些非工资福利具有法定性质,但不遵守规定的情况很常见,主要发生在非正规部门,也发生在正规部门。产假福利尤其如此,这表明有必要进一步执行这些法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oxford Development Studies
Oxford Development Studies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Oxford Development Studies is a multidisciplinary academic journal aimed at the student, research and policy-making community, which provides a forum for rigorous and critical analysis of conventional theories and policy issues in all aspects of development, and aims to contribute to new approaches. It covers a number of disciplines related to development, including economics, history, politics, anthropology and sociology, and will publish quantitative papers as well as surveys of literature.
期刊最新文献
Social equity and care for the earth: tensions and synergies in Latin America Non-contributory social protection for adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: a review of government programmes and impacts Social conflicts over the use of water resources in Chile: the role of social movements and business power ODS lecture, development studies association 2023 stories from the Global South: the interplay of climate science, ‘action’ and the implications for development Inequality in environmental risk exposure and procedural justice in the Matanza-Riachuelo River Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1