Building Social Enterprises Identity: A Comparative Analysis of Social Enterprises Certification Practice in China’s Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION China Nonprofit Review Pub Date : 2019-11-05 DOI:10.1163/18765149-12341353
Wen-Xin Luo, Ying Huang
{"title":"Building Social Enterprises Identity: A Comparative Analysis of Social Enterprises Certification Practice in China’s Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan","authors":"Wen-Xin Luo, Ying Huang","doi":"10.1163/18765149-12341353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nSocial enterprises (SE) certification is a process of labeling SE and distinguishing them from other types of organizations. This article centers on the SE certification practices in China’s Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan, analyzes their development conditions and compares them in the three areas. The research has found that there are many similarities in certification organizers, essential criteria, SE qualifications, government role, the application of certification results in such areas. Meanwhile, evident differences have also been found, which can be explained from the institutional contexts within which social enterprises grow and the maturity of non-profit sectors in these regions. Through the analysis of SE certification practice in the three areas, this article points out that SE certification practice varies in different institutional contexts, but in general it helps social enterprises to construct a unique and distinct identity so as to better acquire support from the market, government and other entities. At the same time, we should be alert to the “fence effect” when endorsing social enterprises, and avoid setting fine-grained indicators which may bring damage to the diversified ecology of social entrepreneurship.","PeriodicalId":41661,"journal":{"name":"China Nonprofit Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341353","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Nonprofit Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social enterprises (SE) certification is a process of labeling SE and distinguishing them from other types of organizations. This article centers on the SE certification practices in China’s Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan, analyzes their development conditions and compares them in the three areas. The research has found that there are many similarities in certification organizers, essential criteria, SE qualifications, government role, the application of certification results in such areas. Meanwhile, evident differences have also been found, which can be explained from the institutional contexts within which social enterprises grow and the maturity of non-profit sectors in these regions. Through the analysis of SE certification practice in the three areas, this article points out that SE certification practice varies in different institutional contexts, but in general it helps social enterprises to construct a unique and distinct identity so as to better acquire support from the market, government and other entities. At the same time, we should be alert to the “fence effect” when endorsing social enterprises, and avoid setting fine-grained indicators which may bring damage to the diversified ecology of social entrepreneurship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建社会企业认同:中国大陆、香港和台湾社会企业认证实践比较分析
社会企业认证是一个给社会企业贴上标签并将其与其他类型的组织区分开来的过程。本文以中国大陆、香港和台湾的SE认证实践为中心,分析了它们的发展状况,并在三地进行了比较。研究发现,在认证组织者、基本标准、SE资质、政府角色、认证结果应用等方面存在诸多相似之处。同时,也发现了明显的差异,这可以从这些地区社会企业成长的制度背景和非营利部门的成熟度来解释。本文通过对这三个地区的SE认证实践的分析,指出SE认证实践在不同的制度背景下有所不同,但总的来说,它有助于社会企业构建独特而鲜明的身份,从而更好地获得市场、政府和其他实体的支持。同时,在为社会企业背书时,应警惕“栅栏效应”,避免设置细粒度指标,以免破坏社会创业多元化生态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Nonprofit Review
China Nonprofit Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
期刊最新文献
Excluded from Political Task: NGO s’ Marginalized Participation in China’s Accurate Poverty Alleviation Project Retrospective Observations on “Legitimacy” of Charitable Fundraising amid COVID-19 Community Resilience: A New Theme in Modernizing Community-Level Governance System and Capability in China Regulating Emergency Volunteer Management to Promote the Development of Emergency Response Voluntary Services Is It a “Window of Opportunity” to Develop a New Normal of Government-Society Cooperation in Emergency Management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1