A Thing like a Human? A Mixed-Methods Study on Sex Doll Usage.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL International Journal of Sexual Health Pub Date : 2022-10-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/19317611.2022.2128491
Lasse Peschka, Marius Raab
{"title":"A Thing like a Human? A Mixed-Methods Study on Sex Doll Usage.","authors":"Lasse Peschka, Marius Raab","doi":"10.1080/19317611.2022.2128491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sex dolls have evolved over the last decades and are getting more popular. Whether sex doll ownership should be protected as a sexual right that facilitates sexual health or whether its usage might be harmful to women and society is vividly discussed. In this polarized debate, empirical research is scarce and possible differentiations in the psychological functions of sex dolls remain nearly unknown. To further explore sex doll ownership, this study conducted five in-depth interviews with sex doll users and collected 131 written reports on sex doll ownership in an online survey with open and closed questions. In a mixed-methods approach, the data was then analyzed using Mayring's Qualitative Content Analysis and quantitative measures. Although the demographics of sex doll users are homogenous (single heterosexual males), results indicate that the use is divers. Sex dolls are mostly used as masturbatory aid, as substitutes for human partners, and as synthetic partners. We explore the similarities and differences between these kinds of usage and propose that a differentiation of sex doll use can enrich current research on social robotics, anthropomorphism, and misogyny.</p>","PeriodicalId":46855,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sexual Health","volume":"34 1","pages":"728-746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sexual Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2022.2128491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sex dolls have evolved over the last decades and are getting more popular. Whether sex doll ownership should be protected as a sexual right that facilitates sexual health or whether its usage might be harmful to women and society is vividly discussed. In this polarized debate, empirical research is scarce and possible differentiations in the psychological functions of sex dolls remain nearly unknown. To further explore sex doll ownership, this study conducted five in-depth interviews with sex doll users and collected 131 written reports on sex doll ownership in an online survey with open and closed questions. In a mixed-methods approach, the data was then analyzed using Mayring's Qualitative Content Analysis and quantitative measures. Although the demographics of sex doll users are homogenous (single heterosexual males), results indicate that the use is divers. Sex dolls are mostly used as masturbatory aid, as substitutes for human partners, and as synthetic partners. We explore the similarities and differences between these kinds of usage and propose that a differentiation of sex doll use can enrich current research on social robotics, anthropomorphism, and misogyny.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
像人一样的东西?性爱娃娃使用的混合方法研究
在过去的几十年里,充气娃娃不断发展,越来越受欢迎。性玩偶的所有权是否应该作为一种促进性健康的性权利受到保护,或者它的使用是否可能对妇女和社会有害,这是一个生动的讨论。在这场两极化的辩论中,实证研究是稀缺的,在性玩偶的心理功能方面可能存在的差异几乎是未知的。为了进一步探索充气娃娃的所有权,本研究对充气娃娃用户进行了五次深度访谈,并通过开放式和封闭式的在线调查收集了131份关于充气娃娃所有权的书面报告。在混合方法方法中,然后使用Mayring的定性内容分析和定量措施对数据进行分析。虽然性玩偶使用者的人口统计数据是同质的(单身异性恋男性),但结果表明,使用是多样化的。性玩偶大多被用作手淫辅助工具,作为人类伴侣的替代品,以及作为合成伴侣。我们探讨了这些类型使用之间的异同,并提出区分性玩偶的使用可以丰富当前对社交机器人、拟人化和厌女症的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, the International Journal of Sexual Health promotes sexual health as a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being through a positive approach to sexuality and sexual rights. The journal publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers, editorials, and reviews, using quantitative and qualitative methods, descriptive and critical analysis, instrument development, surveys, and case studies to examine the essential elements of this broad concept. Leading experts from around the world present original work that covers a variety of disciplines, including sexology, biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, and religion.
期刊最新文献
Sexual Desire Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Czech Republic: A Cross-Sectional Study. "It's a Big Ordeal": A Mixed Methods Study of the Experiences of non-HIV STI Testing Among Trans and Gender Diverse People. Moving Beyond "Risky Behavior": A Qualitative Interview Study Exploring Geosocial Networking App Use by Sexual Minority Men and Women in the UK and USA. The Sacred, the Sinful, and the Shamed: The Association Between Compulsive Sexual Behavior, Moral Disapproval, and Sexual Shame Among Jewish Religious Adolescents. Social Representations of Sexual Assistance Services for People with Physical Disabilities in the Context of Portugal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1