A decision support approach employing the PROMETHEE method and risk factors for critical supply assessment in large-scale projects

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2022.100238
Richard Alex da Cunha , Luís Alberto Duncan Rangel , Christian A. Rudolf , Luiza dos Santos
{"title":"A decision support approach employing the PROMETHEE method and risk factors for critical supply assessment in large-scale projects","authors":"Richard Alex da Cunha ,&nbsp;Luís Alberto Duncan Rangel ,&nbsp;Christian A. Rudolf ,&nbsp;Luiza dos Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2022.100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this article is twofold: to identify the critical risk factors (RFs) that impact supply chains (SC) in the engineering, procurement, and construction of large-scale projects (EPC-LSP) of the oil and gas industry (OGI) and to apply these RFs in a mathematical model developed, based on multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in an expert group. The mathematical model was developed in MATLAB and was based on the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMÉTHÉE) II and (PROMÉTHÉE GDSS) Group Decision Support System methods. The model's criteria were defined with the RF mapping identified using 33 years of literature and the application of questionnaires to specialists. The evaluation process of the alternatives concerning the defined criteria was conducted through questionnaires to specialists. Finally, the functionality and results of the model were validated by the specialists in the field through interviews. As a contribution, managers, companies, and industry could adopt this solution as a practical and dynamic tool to support decision-making. This fact especially holds true in possible critical supply scenarios, where it is necessary to direct resources to minimize risks and other impacts to EPC-LSP SC. Another novelty refers to the critical risk factors identified, originating from an extensive literature mapping covering the three pillars of sustainability. Moreover, this research was to fill the literature gap, given the lack of studies that propose clear, practical, and specific tools for SCRM in EPC-LSP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000136/pdfft?md5=a9f4b8395f523beeed41340f587381f2&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716022000136-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this article is twofold: to identify the critical risk factors (RFs) that impact supply chains (SC) in the engineering, procurement, and construction of large-scale projects (EPC-LSP) of the oil and gas industry (OGI) and to apply these RFs in a mathematical model developed, based on multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in an expert group. The mathematical model was developed in MATLAB and was based on the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMÉTHÉE) II and (PROMÉTHÉE GDSS) Group Decision Support System methods. The model's criteria were defined with the RF mapping identified using 33 years of literature and the application of questionnaires to specialists. The evaluation process of the alternatives concerning the defined criteria was conducted through questionnaires to specialists. Finally, the functionality and results of the model were validated by the specialists in the field through interviews. As a contribution, managers, companies, and industry could adopt this solution as a practical and dynamic tool to support decision-making. This fact especially holds true in possible critical supply scenarios, where it is necessary to direct resources to minimize risks and other impacts to EPC-LSP SC. Another novelty refers to the critical risk factors identified, originating from an extensive literature mapping covering the three pillars of sustainability. Moreover, this research was to fill the literature gap, given the lack of studies that propose clear, practical, and specific tools for SCRM in EPC-LSP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用PROMETHEE方法和风险因素进行大型项目关键供应评估的决策支持方法
本文的目的有两个:确定影响石油和天然气行业(OGI)大型项目(EPC-LSP)工程、采购和建设中的供应链(SC)的关键风险因素(rf),并将这些rf应用于基于专家组多标准决策(MCDM)方法开发的数学模型中。数学模型基于富集评价偏好排序组织方法(PROMÉTHÉE) II和(PROMÉTHÉE GDSS)群体决策支持系统方法,在MATLAB中开发。该模型的标准是通过33年的文献和专家问卷调查确定的射频映射来定义的。关于确定的标准的备选方案的评价过程是通过向专家进行问卷调查进行的。最后,由该领域的专家通过访谈对模型的功能和结果进行验证。作为贡献,管理人员、公司和行业可以采用此解决方案作为支持决策的实用和动态工具。这一事实在可能的关键供应情况下尤其适用,在这种情况下,有必要引导资源以最大限度地减少风险和对EPC-LSP SC的其他影响。另一个新颖之处是,根据涵盖可持续性三大支柱的广泛文献映射,确定了关键风险因素。此外,鉴于缺乏研究为EPC-LSP中的SCRM提供明确、实用和具体的工具,本研究是为了填补文献空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
Integrated order acceptance and inventory policy optimization in a multi-period, multi-product hybrid production system Distributional robustness based on Wasserstein-metric approach for humanitarian logistics problem under road disruptions A generalized behavioral-based goal programming approach for decision-making under imprecision δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis Competitive pricing and seed node selection in a two-echelon supply chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1