Transforming scholarly communications: The part played by the pandemic and the contribution of early career researchers

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1002/leap.1576
David Nicholas, Eti Herman, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Anthony Watkinson, Abdullah Abrizah, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, David Sims, Galina Serbina, David Clark, Hamid. R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard
{"title":"Transforming scholarly communications: The part played by the pandemic and the contribution of early career researchers","authors":"David Nicholas,&nbsp;Eti Herman,&nbsp;Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri,&nbsp;Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo,&nbsp;Anthony Watkinson,&nbsp;Abdullah Abrizah,&nbsp;Marzena Świgoń,&nbsp;Jie Xu,&nbsp;David Sims,&nbsp;Galina Serbina,&nbsp;David Clark,&nbsp;Hamid. R. Jamali,&nbsp;Carol Tenopir,&nbsp;Suzie Allard","doi":"10.1002/leap.1576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Investigates whether junior researchers believe that the scholarly communication system is changing in a significant way, whether they have contributed to the changes they envisaged, whether the pandemic has fast-forwarded change and what they thought a transformed system might look like. The data are drawn from the <i>Harbingers-2</i> project, which investigated the impact of the pandemic on the scholarly communications attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers (ECRs), employing repeat interviewing with around 170 science and social science junior researchers from eight countries. The article focuses on the findings of the last of three rounds of interviews, with comparisons made with the first round, held 18 months earlier, when the pandemic was most active. A majority of ECRs thought that there had been significant changes in the scholarly system, and a large minority thought that the pandemic was responsible. Most of them wanted a system that was more open in terms of open access and open data, with a third taking personal action to bring about change.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigates whether junior researchers believe that the scholarly communication system is changing in a significant way, whether they have contributed to the changes they envisaged, whether the pandemic has fast-forwarded change and what they thought a transformed system might look like. The data are drawn from the Harbingers-2 project, which investigated the impact of the pandemic on the scholarly communications attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers (ECRs), employing repeat interviewing with around 170 science and social science junior researchers from eight countries. The article focuses on the findings of the last of three rounds of interviews, with comparisons made with the first round, held 18 months earlier, when the pandemic was most active. A majority of ECRs thought that there had been significant changes in the scholarly system, and a large minority thought that the pandemic was responsible. Most of them wanted a system that was more open in terms of open access and open data, with a third taking personal action to bring about change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转变学术交流:大流行的作用和早期职业研究人员的贡献
调查初级研究人员是否认为学术交流系统正在发生重大变化,他们是否为他们设想的变化做出了贡献,大流行是否已经快速推进了变化,以及他们认为转变后的系统可能是什么样子。数据来自harbinger‐2项目,该项目调查了疫情对早期职业研究人员(ecr)学术交流态度和行为的影响,对来自8个国家的约170名科学和社会科学初级研究人员进行了重复访谈。本文重点介绍了三轮访谈中最后一轮的调查结果,并与18个月前大流行最活跃时进行的第一轮访谈进行了比较。大多数ecr认为学术体系发生了重大变化,少数人认为疫情是罪魁祸首。他们中的大多数人想要一个在开放获取和开放数据方面更加开放的系统,三分之一的人采取个人行动来带来改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs Issue Information The promotion and implementation of open science measures among high-performing journals from Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, and Spain The stock characters in the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers Exploring named-entity recognition techniques for academic books
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1